arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.06856

The Agentic ETF: How Agentic Trading Becomes an Asset Class

Amandeep Singh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Three structural trends are converging in public markets: the exchange-traded fund (ETF) has become the dominant fund wrapper, actively managed ETFs are the fastest-growing segment within it, and algorithmic systems now mediate the overwhelming majority of trading volume. We argue that their intersection defines a nascent asset class -- the \emph{Agentic ETF}, a fund whose investment process is delegated to autonomous, large-language-model-driven trading agents that reason over data and execute without a human in the loop. We define agentic trading and distinguish it from rule-based algorithmic trading and robo-advice, decompose the agentic-trading infrastructure into six layers, and identify the incumbent players and structural gaps at each layer. We then present ScalarField.io as a reference implementation of an integrated agentic-trading stack -- spanning a unified multi-venue execution registry, isolated strategy agents with continuous broker reconciliation, first-party market data, and metered compute -- and map its primitives to each layer of the stack. A transparent, assumption-stated sizing exercise suggests the Agentic ETF could plausibly reach hundreds of billions to low trillions of dollars in assets under management by 2030.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.TR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amandeep Singh. 2026-06-02. The Agentic ETF: How Agentic Trading Becomes an Asset Class. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06856

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Outsourced Cryptocurrency Wash Trading

I show that outsourced cryptocurrency wash trading is shaped by the objective assigned to the outside firm. When hired to manufacture volume, wash traders buy and sell nearly equal amounts, repeatedly turning over the same inventory. When also tasked with selling issuer holdings, trading becomes markedly more one-sided, with sales exceeding purchases. Using documented enforcement cases and transaction records, I trace these differences in net selling, two-way trading, and inventory replenishment across controlled wallets. The results show that similar reported trading volume can mask fundamentally different economic activity as contractual objectives shape whether manipulation recycles inventory or liquidates issuer holdings.

q-fin.TR↗
arXiv2026

On Bonart's interpretation of the Square-Root Impact Law

The square-root impact law (SRIL), $I = Yσ\sqrt{Q/V}$, bundles two facts that a single mechanism must explain at once: a shape (impact proportional to square-root of traded volume $Q$) and an amplitude ($Y=O(1)$, independent of the participation rate $φ$). Bonart has recently proposed an elegant solution: if realized and counterfactual prices are both diffusive, information-neutral impact must have white increments and the SRIL follows without the wart. We reformulate and simplify his argument, and foreground the ingredient he himself regards as essential --- that the market whitens the stationary stream of each participant's metaorders, not any isolated one. The Lillo--Mike--Farmer model satisfies his premises, yet gives an isolated metaorder the super-square-root impact $φ^{(1-γ)/2}Q^{(1+γ)/2}$, $γ\in(0,1)$, because single metaorders (i.e. not part of a stream) are statistically invisible and thus priced mechanically. We then construct an explicit multi-agent propagator that realizes Bonart's whitening, and show it reproduces the clean SRIL precisely when the market can attribute trades to their issuer. But correct re-attribution of anonymous trades is a formidable task, which requires markets to behave as implausibly efficient signal processing machines. The stream hypothesis makes a sharp, falsifiable prediction --- isolated metaorders, well separated in time, should not obey the SRIL --- that does not seem agree with empirical data known to us. Independently, a volume-conservation argument singles out the square-root law and lays bare the step the diffusivity route must assume: diffusivity fixes the variance of impact --- an additive, stationary, age-blind quantity --- whereas the SRIL is a law for the mean impact, which marginally decays as $1/\sqrt{\text{age}}$ and therefore demands an origin of time.

q-fin.TR↗
arXiv2026

Latent Continuum of Regimes in Limit Order Book Dynamics

Market-regime models typically assume a finite set of discrete latent states. We examine whether high frequency limit-order-book dynamics exhibit distinct regime separation or apparent regimes result from discretising an underlying continuum, analysing deep limit-order book data for EURO STOXX 50 index futures across 987 clean trading days from 2022 to 2025 using 30, 45 and 60-second aggregation windows. Market states are represented by symmetric positive definite covariance matrices and analysed under Log-Euclidean and affine-invariant geometries; the resulting state cloud has an effective dimension of approximately 1.4. A causal anomaly layer filters statistical, calendar and rollover contamination, while label-free economic validation evaluates market-state separation independently of volatility-based proxy labels. A 17-method zoo spanning conventional and Riemannian representations, reinforced by full-cloud geometric certificates, consistently favours a continuum over a discrete regime structure. A dominant latent coordinate captures between 83.66% and 85.27% of variation in the covariance-state geometry and tracks VSTOXX without regime labels, remaining stable across years although its average level shifts with market conditions, indicating that conventional regimes are coarse quantisations. A divisive hierarchy spanning macro, macro-subregime, micro and micro-subregime tiers is evaluated using expanding-year walk-forward tests, with out-of-sample performance strongest at the macro tier while finer tiers fail to generalise; continuous fine-scale information nonetheless remains predictive, and its discretisation causes the performance loss. Forecasting performance peaks near ten minutes, reaching a maximum pooled R2_OOS of 0.7483. Overall, the latent stress coordinate defines a stable, low-dimensional geometric continuum that captures market stress and its predictive dynamics.

q-fin.TR↗