arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.06228

Hiding a Vertex from the Temporal Explorer: A Lower Bound for Degree-Bounded Temporal Graphs

Abstract

A temporal graph is a sequence of graphs on a common set of $n$ vertices, its snapshots, one for each time step. An agent, knowing the entire sequence in advance, may at each time step wait or move along an edge of the current snapshot, and the temporal graph is explored once the agent has visited every vertex. We consider always-connected temporal graphs, in which every snapshot is connected, and ask how long exploration can be forced to take when the underlying graph, the union of all snapshots, has maximum degree at most~$Δ$. Two lower bounds were known in this setting, $Ω(Δn)$ and $Ω(n\log n)$, realised by different constructions. We establish a stronger lower bound, answering a question of Bastide, Groenland, Michel and Rambaud. Specifically, for every $n$ and $Δ$ with $Δ_0\leΔ\le n-1$ we construct an always-connected temporal graph on $n$ vertices with underlying maximum degree at most~$Δ$ that cannot be explored in fewer than $γ\,Δn\,(1+\log(n/Δ))$ time steps from any start vertex, where $γ>0$ and $Δ_0$ are absolute constants. The construction is deterministic, and every snapshot is a spanning tree with exactly one vertex of degree greater than three. Time is divided into phases. In each phase, a rotating-cycle gadget prevents the agent from reaching more than half of the trees attached to it. Between phases, we reassign target vertices among these trees using walks on a constant-degree expander, and a Gray code order of the targets keeps the underlying degree bounded. The reassignment guarantees that, for any walk of the agent, some target remains unvisited throughout all phases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniele Carnevale. 2026-10-05. Hiding a Vertex from the Temporal Explorer: A Lower Bound for Degree-Bounded Temporal Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06228

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Non-adaptive Bellman-Ford: Yen's improvement is optimal

The Bellman-Ford algorithm for single-source shortest paths repeatedly updates tentative distances in an operation called {relaxing an edge}. In several important applications a {non-adaptive} (oblivious) implementation is preferred, which means fixing the entire sequence of relaxations upfront, independently of the edge-weights. The original implementation of the algorithm performs, in a dense graph on $n$ vertices, $(1+o(1))n^3 $ relaxations. An improvement by Yen from 1970 reduces the number of relaxations by a factor of two. We show that no further constant-factor improvements are possible, and every {non-adaptive deterministic} algorithm based on relaxations must perform $(\frac{1}{2} - o(1))n^3$ steps. This improves an earlier lower bound of Eppstein of $(\frac{1}{6} - o(1))n^3$. Given that a {non-adaptive randomized} variant of Bellman-Ford with at most $(\frac{1}{3} + o(1))n^3$ relaxations (with high probability) is known, our result implies a strict separation between deterministic and randomized strategies, answering an open question of Eppstein. We also address the complexity of finding {short} relaxation sequences for a given input graph on $n$ vertices, answering a question of Eppstein. We show that the problem is co-NP-hard, and moreover essentially inapproximable: While an $n$-approximation is easily obtained, for every $ε> 0$, no polynomial-time $n^{1-ε}$-approximation exists, unless P = NP. We further show that {deciding} whether a given relaxation sequence is valid is co-NP-complete, even when the input is the complete graph.

cs.DS↗

Exponential Quantum Space Advantage for Approximating Max-$k$SAT in the Streaming Setting

In this paper, we give a one-pass quantum streaming algorithm for Max-$k$SAT that uses $\operatorname{polylog}(n)$ space and achieves a $0.7426$-approximation on instances with $n$ variables and $\operatorname{poly}(n)$ clauses. In contrast, prior work by Chou, Golovnev, and Velusamy (FOCS 2020) implies that achieving an approximation ratio better than $\sqrt{2}/2 \approx 0.7071$ for Max-$k$SAT requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ space for any classical streaming algorithm. Therefore, it yields an exponential quantum space advantage for Max-$k$SAT in the streaming setting. Combining with the known results, it gives a complete classification of quantum space advantages for all Boolean Max-2CSPs.

cs.DS↗

Solving Stackelberg Vertex Cover on trees using split and join

The Stackelberg Vertex Cover problem is a bilevel optimization problem with two players on a graph G = ($F \cup P$, E) where each vertex from F has a weight and the first player selects a price for each vertex in P . Afterwards, the second player finds a minimum weight vertex cover X and the first player receives the set price for each vertex from $X \cap P$ . The goal is to maximize the revenue of the first player. This problem was recently shown to be NP-complete for bipartite graphs while being solvable in linear time on paths. We present four new algorithms for solving Stackelberg Vertex Cover on certain kinds of graphs: (1) a pseudo-polynomial algorithm working on general trees when all weights are integer with a runtime linear in the number of vertices and cubic in the maximum weight (2) a generalization of (1) for bipartite graphs with integer weights and a tree decomposition that is FPT in the maximum weight and the treewidth, (3) a strongly polynomial algorithm for rooted trees having the property that the least common ancestor of any two vertices from P is again in P (this case includes paths); and (4) an FPT-algorithm for trees, where the parameter is the maximum number P-vertices $v_i$ that an F-vertex u can reach while using no other P -vertices. These algorithms are based on a lemma that allows us to split instances at a vertex u into multiple sub-instances, which follows from LP duality and integrality of the vertex cover LP on bipartite graphs. The lemma requires that the minimum vertex covers of the sub-instances agree on u (either all include u or all don't). For this we introduce the concept of commitments. We show that the Stackelberg Vertex Cover problem with commitments is weakly NP-complete. An open question is the non-bipartite case as there is an explicit counterexample showing that the split-and-join technique does not work.

cs.DS↗