arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.06168

Model Risk Analysis for Entropic Hedging Strategies

Abstract

Entropic risk optimisation is a general framework for pricing and hedging financial derivatives in incomplete markets that can be used to decompose P&L into market and model risk contributions. When the prices are quadratic Gaussian, the coupled equations for price and hedge ratios are solved in closed form. This enables comprehensive analysis of trading P&L, with a decomposition of the model value-at-risk into convexity, dimension and funding contributions that are attributed in the explanation of realised P&L. The equations of the quadratic Gaussian model are directly applicable when the underlying prices follow Gaussian processes, such as fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. The model also provides simple parametric expressions for hedge ratios that can be used for regressions in deep hedging.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paul McCloud. 2026-10-05. Model Risk Analysis for Entropic Hedging Strategies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06168

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Gatheral's Conjecture Revisited

We consider the Heston model with perfect negative spot--variance correlation and its one-dimensional local-volatility projection. Let $I_T^{\mathrm H}$ and $I_T^{\mathrm{LV}}$ denote their respective integrated variances over $[0,T]$. We establish the inequality \[ \mathbb{E}\bigl[(I_T^{\mathrm H}-K)^+\bigr] < \mathbb{E}\bigl[(I_T^{\mathrm{LV}}-K)^+\bigr] \] for every maturity $T>0$ and every strike $K>0$. Consequently, Heston integrated variance is strictly smaller in convex order than the integrated variance of the calibrated local-volatility model. This strict ordering gives a Heston-model counterexample to the convex-order inequality conjectured by J. Gatheral.

q-fin.MF↗

Robust distortion riskmetrics under Wasserstein ambiguity

Risk evaluation under distributional ambiguity is central to decision making in finance, economics, and operations research. Wasserstein balls provide a natural way to describe uncertainty around a reference distribution. We solve a natural yet open problem of robust optimization for the class of distortion riskmetrics with Wasserstein distance as the sole ambiguity constraint. This chosen objective class does not require convexity, monotonicity, and continuity of distortion functions, encompassing many common risk measures and deviation measures. First, we characterize conditions under which direct convexification preserves the worst-case value. Second, we develop a constructive method for exact worst-case evaluation when the direct convexification conditions fail. Third, we construct explicit approximate worst-case distributions and provide computable error bounds to assess their accuracy without solving the exact problem. We apply these results to distributionally robust portfolio selection and use numerical experiments to assess approximation accuracy and the resulting portfolio decisions.

q-fin.MF↗

Optimal Investment to Reach a Financial Goal: A Stochastic Control Framework

We develop a framework for an investor who trades until she either reaches a financial goal or an exogenous deadline arrives. Analogous to utility functions over wealth, we measure satisfaction with the timing of reaching a goal by a discount function. For a continuous-time market where a stochastic factor drives the dynamics of stock prices and the financial goals, the investor maximizes the expected discount at the goal reaching time and the expected utility of the funding ratio if the goal remains unreached by the deadline. This setup leads to a new class of stochastic control problems. We establish Bellman's principle of optimality and characterize the value function as a viscosity solution to the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. When the deadline is infinite and the goal is constant, the HJB equation reduces to a form related to the backward heat equation, for which we provide a complete characterization of smooth solutions. When analytical solutions are unavailable, we develop an approach based on Howard's algorithm to obtain numerical solutions. Our analysis shows that optimal investment policies for goal reaching problems can be decreasing in the drift of risky assets and need not converge to full risk-free investment even as volatility diverges to infinity.

q-fin.MF↗