arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.06101

Which modelling choices shape your interpolation map? An Optimal Transport sensitivity analysis for groundwater sulfate concentration

Corinna Perchtold·Jérémy Rohmer·Augustin Thomas·Julie Lions
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Spatial prediction maps are crucial for environmental management yet highly sensitive to subjective modelling choices such as, e.g., covariates, spatial dependence structures, or mesh resolution. We develop a workflow that attributes the resulting map uncertainty to these choices and is applicable to any spatial model, since it operates only on an ensemble of maps produced by propagating the choices through spatial prediction. This ensemble is then filtered to retain only models with acceptable predictive performance, reduced in dimension by principal component (PC) analysis, and the sensitivity of the resulting scores to each choice is quantified by global sensitivity analysis based on optimal transport (OT) metrics. We demonstrate the framework with Bayesian geostatistics applied to the spatial mapping of sulphate concentrations in groundwater of Paris Basin (France), which is key for assessing groundwater chemical quality and establishing the natural geochemical baseline of aquifers. For this application, the covariates, mesh resolution, covariance models, and priors are combined into 18000 candidate configurations. These are filtered by cross-validated root mean square error (RMSE) and 95% coverage of the prediction interval, and the retained configurations are then inferred on a high-resolution grid and reduced to its three PCs. The OT analysis identifies covariate selection (under 95% coverage) and mesh resolution (under RMSE) as the dominant sources of uncertainty to the PCs, and a negligible one for the choice of the covariance model.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Corinna Perchtold, Jérémy Rohmer, Augustin Thomas, Julie Lions. 2026-10-05. Which modelling choices shape your interpolation map? An Optimal Transport sensitivity analysis for groundwater sulfate concentration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06101

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

GARCH copulas, v-transforms and D-vines for stochastic volatility

The bivariate copulas that describe the dependencies and partial dependencies of lagged variables in strictly stationary, first-order GARCH-type processes are investigated. It is shown that the copulas of symmetric GARCH processes are jointly symmetric but non-exchangeable, while the copulas of processes with symmetric innovation distributions and asymmetric leverage effects have weaker h-symmetry; copulas with asymmetric innovation distributions have neither form of symmetry. Since the true bivariate copulas are typically inaccessible, due to the unknown functional forms of the marginal distributions of GARCH processes, a new class of approximating copulas is proposed. These rely on copula density constructions that combine standard bivariate copula densities for positive dependence with two uniformity-preserving transformations known as v-transforms. The construction is shown to be particularly effective when applied to the density of the copula of the absolute values of a spherical t distribution. Tractable simplified D-vines incorporating the new pair copulas are developed for applications to time series showing stochastic volatility. The resulting models are shown to provide better fits to simulated data from GARCH processes, and to a dataset of financial exchange-rate returns, than have previously been obtained using vine copulas.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Selecting Informative Conformal Prediction Sets with an Optimized FCR-Controlled Approach

Conformal methods provide prediction sets for outcomes with confidence guarantees. We study their use in a selective inference setting, where inference is performed only when the prediction set is informative. The analyst may consider as informative, for example, cases with prediction sets that are sufficiently small, exclude null values, or satisfy other appropriate monotone constraints. Because inference is typically restricted to informative cases in practical applications, accounting for the resulting selection bias is crucial to maintaining false coverage rate (FCR) control. A general framework for constructing such informative conformal prediction sets while controlling the FCR on the selected sample was suggested in Gazin et al. (2025). In this work we focus on oracle-guided procedures. We derive the optimal decision policy under a suitable power objective in the oracle setting where the probability of belonging to each prediction set can be computed. In practice, of course, only estimated probabilities are available. We therefore introduce calibration procedures that adjust the oracle policy to maintain finite-sample FCR control. We show that this approach can achieve substantially higher power than available alternatives. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our new methods for classification outcomes on both real and simulated data.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Model--based clustering for spherical and hyper--spherical data using elliptically symmetric distributions

Model--based clustering for directional data data has attracted a lot of interest, but most methods utilize rotationally symmetric distributions. This paper suggests the use of elliptically symmetric distributions, namely the elliptically symmetric angular Gaussian and the spherical elliptically symmetric projected Cauchy distributions that were recently proposed in the literature for modelling spherical data. The expectation--maximization algorithm is employed and the inclusion of covariates is also examined. Simulation studies compare the two distributions in terms of choosing the optimal number of clusters and computational cost. We use the mixtures of these two distributions to cluster two datasets on the sphere (earthquake locations) and two hyper--spherical datasets.

stat.ME↗