Comparing two approaches for modelling the loss given default of credit cards: Run-off triangles vs regression

Arno Botha; Henko Crewe; Marcel Muller; Janette Larney

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.05926

Comparing two approaches for modelling the loss given default of credit cards: Run-off triangles vs regression

Arno Botha·Henko Crewe·Marcel Muller·Janette Larney

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The use of run-off triangles (ROTs) is a common industry practice in estimating the loss given default (LGD) risk parameter when predicting credit losses in banking. We benchmark this industry practice using credit card data against a more sophisticated (though classical) regression-based approach, which is able to leverage various types of input variables in producing loan-level LGD-estimates. This regression-based approach can demonstrably recover the typical characteristics of the 'U-shaped' empirical LGD-distribution, which the ROT-based approach cannot do. First, we critically review the ROT-based approach and identify multiple demerits using data-driven diagnostics. We then estimate a two-stage regression-based LGD-model and favourably assess the model performance of each component (or 'stage'). Finally, we aggregate the LGD-estimates produced by each approach over time, and compare each time series to the mean empirical loss rate over time. The ROT-based aggregates diverge substantially from the empirical rate over most time periods, whilst the regression-based aggregates follow the empirical trends much closer. These results underscore the greater prediction accuracy of the regression-based LGD-model, relative to the ROT-based one. By implication, the former approach is probably better than the latter ROT-based approach when estimating the LGD under the IFRS 9 accounting framework, which prioritises accuracy.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.RM stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Arno Botha, Henko Crewe, Marcel Muller, Janette Larney. 2026-10-05. Comparing two approaches for modelling the loss given default of credit cards: Run-off triangles vs regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Implementability in Insurance Markets with Adverse Selection

We consider an insurance market with hidden information, where the agent's type is private information and is drawn from an arbitrary type space. We study implementability of a collection of retention functions, namely, how to select premium schedules so that the resulting menu of contracts is incentive compatible, or truthful. Specifically, for general type spaces, implementability is equivalent to cyclical monotonicity of the collection of retention functions. For compact interval type spaces, we show that submodularity is a sufficient condition for implementability, under suitable type ordering assumptions. Moreover, for any implementable collection of retention functions, we characterize all corresponding premium schedules, up to a common additive constant. Finally, we apply our results to several standard classes of insurance contracts, for which the general implementability conditions admit simpler characterizations, and we provide several numerical illustrations.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2026

A Functional Representation of Credit Behavior for Probability of Default Modeling

This paper proposes a framework for modeling probability of default via functional data analysis. By representing a series of credit variables as functions, we investigate whether intra-monthly information improves default predictability in linear models. We further show how a range of widely used variables, among them available funds, utilization rate, and overdraft, can all be derived from three quantities observed over time. Namely, 1) the type of each account, 2) the balance of the account, and 3) the size of the credit limit on the account. Retaining these quantities as continuous-time processes, rather than reducing them to monthly aggregated values, yields a continuous faithful representation of the borrower. When analyzing these three processes, we discovered that recurring events associated with the ordinal position among banking days created strong cyclical patterns. We therefore develop a relative time framework that aligns the recurring events across borrowers, ensuring that borrowers possess the same cyclical pattern, regardless of real time. We assess the framework using functional logistic regression. This approach accommodates the continuous representation while remaining closely related to a logistic regression model commonly used in credit risk practice, due to strict regulatory constraints. We show that, when equipped with an effective functional representation of transactional trajectories, the proposed model attains predictive performance on par with XGBoost while consistently outperforming logistic regression. Importantly, the model balances predictive performance of a machine learning model with the interpretability of linear default models, potentially enabling financial institutions to use the model, even under strict regulation.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2026

Learned Monotone Recurrent Features in Governed Credit Scoring: The Price of the Frame and the Necessity of Macro Conditioning

Regulated credit scoring requires scores monotone non-decreasing in every exposure input. Deployed pipelines -- hand-crafted monotone aggregates feeding sign-constrained gradient boosting -- already meet this by composition; the open question is what learned temporal aggregation is worth inside one. We answer on five production-scale credit datasets at matched admissibility (one priced baseline convention excepted), with a monotone recurrent architecture whose per-input guarantee we extend, with proofs, to vector-valued inputs and to exogenously macro-conditioned decay gates, severities, thresholds, and peak memory. Two findings result. First, a strictness ladder: the value of learned monotone features rises with governance-frame strictness -- zero on unconstrained engineered panels, maximal in summaries-only frames -- replicated across two datasets and an official temporal-stability metric, though unconditioned features degrade on externally adjudicated later weeks. Second, a conditioning-delivery asymmetry under regime shift. On a train-on-boom, test-on-crisis mortgage design, two public macroeconomic series hurt as input columns, yet conditioning the recurrence on them delivers the paper's only learned-block crisis-cohort uplifts. The confirmed effect: +0.006 to +0.013 AUC on an internally pre-registered Freddie Mac replication, at all five held-out seeds. The discovery estimate: +0.015 to +0.021 on Fannie Mae (three of five seeds post hoc), worth 10-27 basis points of defaulted balance at an 80% approval cutoff, and grows with early-prepaid loans excluded. A state-level test identifies the mechanism: between-cohort calibration transfer. A pandemic-band episode bounds scope: under forbearance-distorted labels the gain generalizes at a quarter to a third of crisis size on Fannie Mae, on Freddie Mac only against the capacity control.

q-fin.RM↗