arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.05873

When Token Transfers Do Not Mean Liquidity in Tokenized Real-World Assets

Emre Atay Tümer·Rischan Mafrur
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

On-chain transfer volume is often used to describe activity in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), although recorded transfers may reflect very different economic functions, including token creation, destruction, issuer-related operations, and movements between other addresses. Ownership measures face a similar problem because a large address balance may belong to a pool or intermediary that represents multiple investors. We address these two measurement problems by decomposing transfer activity and making ownership coverage explicit. Transfer turnover is calculated before and after observable event categories are separated, using the same asset, observation window, and supply denominator. For ownership, we compare concentration measured against total supply with concentration among the addresses that remain after identified intermediaries are excluded. Using Ethereum-based tokenized funds from December 2025 to August 2026, we find that transfer classification can materially change measured turnover. We also show that removing an intermediary can lower concentration when measured against total supply while concentration among the remaining addresses increases. Transfer activity and address concentration need to be interpreted with their underlying transaction functions and ownership coverage in mind. These measures provide evidence about liquidity-related activity, but they do not directly measure market liquidity. The code and data used in the analysis are available at https://github.com/atytmr07/rwa-liquidity.

Explore related subjects

cs.CEq-fin.CP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emre Atay Tümer, Rischan Mafrur. 2026-10-05. When Token Transfers Do Not Mean Liquidity in Tokenized Real-World Assets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05873

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The PUR-1 Cyber-Physical Digital Twin

Digital twin technologies have the potential to improve operational flexibility and responsiveness capabilities of nuclear systems. To provide decision support, cyber event characterization, state estimation, predictive control, and real-time dynamic processing of operational data, however, an efficient digital twin needs to integrate multiple models (data-driven as well as physics-based) with explainability while at the same time maintain two-way synchronization with the physical facility at a time constant less than its operational cycle. In this work, we present the Purdue University Reactor One Digital Twin (PUR-1 DT), a cyber-physical digital twin with a complete high-fidelity physics-based and AI-driven virtual model stack (neutronics, thermal-hydraulics, point kinetics) which provides closed-loop explainable diagnostics, forecasting, predictive control, and action recommendation back to the reactor via two-way communications and a cyber-physical testbed. We demonstrate real-time synchronized state estimation and short-term forecasting over a full reactor operational cycle and conduct a series of benchmarking experiments to validate accuracy and latency. Our results show good agreement with experimental results and lay the groundwork for further development and experimental demonstration of DT-enabled functionalities in real-world facilities.

cs.CE↗
arXiv2026

MiDShip: Multimodal Dataset of Ship Cargo Hold Structures for Engineering Design

Ship structures govern vessel strength, safety, and manufacturability, but their design must satisfy hundreds of classification society requirements, making the process complex and iterative. Data-driven approaches are limited by the lack of structured datasets linking design geometry, structural performance, and rule-based constraints. This paper presents MiDShip, a multimodal dataset of 12,753 synthetic cargo-hold structural designs: 6,020 random, 496 generated by an SGLD-inspired procedure, and 6,237 generated by an equation-informed repair procedure. Each design includes parametric data, full and mesh-ready 3D geometry, engineering drawings and annotations, a bill of materials, and preliminary structural evaluations. Twenty-five constraints derived from a subset of ABS MVR are also evaluated. None of the random designs satisfies all constraints. Among the SGLD-inspired designs, 322 (64.9%) were fully compliant, with an average of 0.409 violations, 82.7% below the seed mean and 96.9% below the random-design mean. The repair procedure, developed through LLM-assisted code analysis, produced 4,952 fully compliant designs (79.4%), averaging 0.296 violations, 97.1% below the paired-source mean. In equal-size comparisons, mean nearest-neighbor distances in the scaled 120-parameter space were 3.495 for repaired designs, 1.144 for SGLD batches, and 3.729 for random designs. The primary contribution is the synchronized dataset and its generation and evaluation infrastructure; the generation studies demonstrate its utility rather than proposing new optimization algorithms. MiDShip supports machine learning, generative design, and automated rule-based evaluation for ship structures.

cs.CE↗
arXiv2026

From Research Gaps to Theoretical Opportunities: Theory-Oriented GenAI for Research Opportunity Evaluation

Generative AI (GenAI) can explore large bodies of literature and generate plausible research ideas, but identifying what is missing, understudied, contradictory, or potentially connected does not by itself reveal where theory should advance. We develop a theory-oriented agentic AI system that helps researchers identify potential theorizing opportunities by incorporating established theorizing approaches into literature exploration and evaluation. The system operates through three stages. Stage 1 expands the theoretical search space and constructs a provisional Candidate Knowledge Graph. Stage 2 independently reconstructs what the literature supports through source grounded evidence extraction and theory-state reconstruction. Stage 3 evaluates the reconstructed knowledge state to determine whether an unresolved configuration warrants theory development or another research action and, when theory development is warranted, which theorizing approach is appropriate. We demonstrate the system through an end-to-end analysis of human oversight of agentic AI systems in organizations. The analysis shows that literature gaps alone are insufficient for identifying theoretical opportunities. For example, "transparency to trust" is routed to mechanism-based theorizing because the relationship is repeatedly documented in prior studies, while the generative mechanism explaining how transparency shapes trust remains insufficiently specified. By combining large-scale literature processing, structured knowledge representation, and theorizing-guided diagnosis, the system serves as a theory-oriented research assistant that supports researchers in identifying theoretically meaningful directions for subsequent research.

cs.CE↗