Nexus: An Execution Fabric for AI Agents Across Cloud, Edge, and Devices

Cary Chang; Jialin Zhou

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.05709

Nexus: An Execution Fabric for AI Agents Across Cloud, Edge, and Devices

Cary Chang·Jialin Zhou

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Language-model agents are evolving into long-running services that interact with models, tools, computers, mobile devices, and distributed environments. Existing agent frameworks simplify reasoning and tool invocation. However, cloud-centric designs face three limitations: centralized execution increases failure impact, scaling pressure, and compute cost; extending agents across computers, mobile devices, and edge environments requires a unified execution abstraction with permission control; and long-running executions require consistent lifecycle management across failures, recovery, results, usage, and settlement. We present Nexus, a cloud-edge platform that treats each invocation as a persistent task. Nexus uses an OpenWrt-based runtime for distributed serving, run-scoped delegation for authorized access to Computer and Mobile environments, and persistent records to track execution, outputs, failures, recovery, usage, and charging across cloud and edge components. We evaluate Nexus on controlled, cross-device, and model-driven workloads. All ten Computer-Android workflows succeed, and all six revocation tests block subsequent writes while preserving prior authorized reads. Under worker loss, journaling eliminates duplicate appends (six to zero per task), adding 0.933 s mean normal-path overhead. Across 24 matched task pairs, Nexus completes 24 tasks versus Dify's 22 and is a median 3.88 s faster on jointly successful pairs. In a separate workload, Nexus operates under a smaller tested incremental-runtime memory ceiling than Dapr (16 versus 64 MiB), although Dapr achieves lower successful-call latency. These results demonstrate how locality, operation-scoped authority, and persistent result identity support cloud-edge agent services with workload-dependent costs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Cary Chang, Jialin Zhou. 2026-10-05. Nexus: An Execution Fabric for AI Agents Across Cloud, Edge, and Devices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05709

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

VeriNC: Finding Design Risks of In-Network Computing Systems

The emergence of programmable switches has brought in-network computing (INC) into the spotlight in recent years. By offloading computation directly onto the data transmission process, INC improves network utilization, reduces latency to sub-RTT levels, saves link bandwidth, and maintains throughput. However, INC disrupts the transparency of traditional networks, forcing developers to consider network exceptions like packet loss and out-of-order. If not properly handled, these exceptions can lead to violations of application properties, such as cache consistency and lock exclusion. Usual testing cannot exhaustively cover these exceptions, raising doubts about the correctness of INC systems and hindering their deployment in the industry. This paper presents VeriNC, the first general-purpose tool for verifying INC systems. VeriNC provides a high-level specification language and saves developers 67.2% lines of code on average. To help better understand the behavior of the system, VeriNC offers configurable network environments. VeriNC enables developers to express INC-specific correctness properties. VeriNC translates developer-specified systems into state transition representations, performs model checking to detect potential design risks, and reports violation traces to developers. We propose optimizations for INC-specific scenarios to address the challenge of state space explosion. We modeled INC systems across four application domains and identified design risks with VeriNC in seconds. VeriNC has also been adopted to guide the design of a new INC protocol. Based on our verification experience, we summarize lessons that help develop a correct INC protocol. We further reproduce them in real systems to confirm the validity of our verification result.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

TorchGWAS 1.0: GPU-accelerated GWAS at scale

Imaging, molecular, and machine-learning workflows can generate thousands of quantitative phenotypes in a single cohort, creating substantial computational and output bottlenecks when testing traits individually. TorchGWAS is a GPU-accelerated framework that uses batched operations for high-throughput, covariate-adjusted linear association testing across large panels of quantitative phenotypes. Across 500,036 allele-harmonized tests, TorchGWAS t statistics agreed with PLINK 2.0. On an NVIDIA H100 80-GB GPU with a 48-core Intel Xeon Gold 6442Y host and measured disk read and write rates of 5.98 and 1.49 GB/s, respectively, median end-to-end times for 4.57 billion associations (8,931,083 variants by 512 phenotypes in 35,365 samples) were 28.46 s for BED, 29.13 s for hard-call PGEN, 51.48 s for BGEN, and 58.95 s for dosage PGEN, including writing 36.7 GB of binary summary statistics. TorchGWAS provides an efficient Python-based framework for parallel fixed-effect association screening at biobank scale.TorchGWAS is implemented in Python and distributed as a documented source repository at https://github.com/ZhiGroup/TorchGWAS.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

AI-Assisted Computational Reproducibility on the FABRIC Testbed

Computational reproducibility remains difficult despite being central to scientific research. In this paper, we show how the international FABRIC testbed, combined with a large language model (LLM) coding agent through LoomAI, can simplify reproducing published experiments across multiple domains. We reproduced three case studies on FABRIC, covering BBR-family congestion-control evaluations, LAMMPS molecular dynamics scaling benchmarks on a CPU-only MPI cluster, and stress protein homeostasis genomics pipelines. Rather than focusing only on matching numerical outputs, we evaluate whether the reproduced experiments support the same scientific conclusions as the original studies. The AI assistant was effective in setting up the environment, adapting code, and debugging, but struggled with the analysis stages that lacked clearly defined workflows, which required human guidance to establish execution order and data dependencies. Across the case studies, the AI-assisted workflow reduced reproduction effort by roughly 4--6 times. We conclude with practical recommendations for improving AI-assisted reproducibility on research testbeds.

cs.DC↗