Robust Optimization of Spring Design under Variable Manufacturing Tolerances

Grzegorz Sroka; Slawomir T. Wierzchon

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.04656

Robust Optimization of Spring Design under Variable Manufacturing Tolerances

Grzegorz Sroka·Slawomir T. Wierzchon

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A reliable assessment of an optimizer robustness requires tracking controlled changes in parameters to identify sources of algorithmic weakness. Such an approach was applied to the problem of designing tension/compression springs with three continuous variables describing the spring geometry. Three additional independent binary parameters reflect material variability, manufacturing-related geometric deviations, and an additional safety margin. Without expanding the decision space, these parameters can be combined in eight ways to generate variants that allow for direct comparison. In this study we distinguish between robustness effects and the dimension of the problem, which allows tracking changes in feasibility while keeping the nominal mass objective constant. Seven optimization methods and eight hybridized their variants are used for the analysis. The hybridization mechanism applies the operator selected by the prediction procedure presented in Section 3. All methods are evaluated under the same experimental conditions. Each method is run thirty times for each variant, with a maximum of 30000 function evaluations permitted per run. The final quality assessment takes into account the geometry of the feasibility region, search trajectories, performance variations across landscapes and the computational cost of fixed objectives. Together, these factors allow us to determine the quality of the solution, reproducibility, feasibility control, and the effectiveness of optimization. An interesting observation was that hybridization can mitigate cost or feasibility losses associated with a specific configuration. While it compensates for a specific weakness in the underlying mechanism, it does not provide universal resilience.

Explore related subjects

cs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Grzegorz Sroka, Slawomir T. Wierzchon. 2026-10-03. Robust Optimization of Spring Design under Variable Manufacturing Tolerances. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04656

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On the use of evolutionary optimization for the dynamic chance constrained open-pit mine scheduling problem

Open-pit mine scheduling is a complex real-world optimization problem that involves uncertain economic values and dynamically changing resource capacities. Evolutionary algorithms are particularly effective in these scenarios, as they can easily adapt to uncertain and changing environments. However, uncertainty and dynamic changes are often studied in isolation in real-world problems. In this paper, we study a dynamic chance-constrained open-pit mine scheduling problem in which block economic values are stochastic and mining and processing capacities vary over time. We adopt a bi-objective evolutionary formulation that simultaneously maximizes expected discounted profit and minimizes its standard deviation. To address dynamic changes, we propose a diversity-based change response mechanism that repairs a subset of infeasible solutions and introduces additional feasible solutions whenever a change is detected. We evaluate the effectiveness of this mechanism across four multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and compare it with a baseline re-evaluation-based change-response strategy. Experimental results on six mining instances demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently outperforms the baseline methods across different uncertainty levels and change frequencies.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2026

Common-Mode Errors Limit Low-Timestep Deep Spiking Q-Networks

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer sparse and event-driven computation, making them attractive for energy-constrained reinforcement learning (RL) on edge devices. In value-based RL, deep spiking Q-networks (DSQNs) combine such efficiency with action-value estimation for decision making. However, existing DSQNs often require multiple simulation timesteps for competitive performance, increasing computational and energy costs, whereas reducing the timesteps can cause substantial performance degradation. We investigate this degradation from the perspective of Q-value estimation errors. By decomposing errors across actions into common-mode and differential-mode components, we find that low-timestep DSQNs suffer disproportionately from common-mode errors shared across action values, which are particularly detrimental to temporal-difference learning through bootstrapped targets. Based on this finding, we propose Common-Mode Compensation Deep Spiking Q-Network (CMC-DSQN), which uses an auxiliary ANN to compensate for common-mode errors in the SNN outputs. At inference, greedy action selection can be performed directly from the SNN outputs, allowing the auxiliary ANN to be completely removed and preserving the energy efficiency of SNNs. Extensive experiments on Atari and MiniAtar environments demonstrate substantial performance improvements under low-timestep settings. CMC-DSQN outperforms state-of-the-art DSQN baselines by nearly $20\%$ at $T=2$ and further surpasses the ANN baseline at $T=4$.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2026

Forecast Accuracy Is Not Trading Profit: Evolving Small Recurrent Networks for Stock Return Prediction

Time series forecasting models are typically compared on pointwise error, which scores a prediction in isolation from the decision it is produced for, and a lower forecast error does not imply a better decision downstream. A parallel debate asks whether modern transformer architectures forecast better than recurrent and other lightweight models. We compare linear, fixed recurrent, transformer, and mixing based architectures against recurrent networks evolved by neuroevolutionary architecture search, evaluating each on forecast accuracy and on the net return of a daily long/short strategy. All models are fit on a pooled panel, one network trained across the whole universe. Across four mid-cap portfolios and three trading years, the evolved networks rank first on both forecast accuracy and net trading performance, while the second most accurate model loses money once positions are formed and costs are charged. The advantage tracks a horizon match, since rank IC for the evolved networks rises from a one-day to a ten-day scoring horizon while every model above 300 parameters declines. They are also the cheapest end to end: a CPU-only search of 16 minutes yields 66-weight networks that predict in 10.8~$μ$s on a Raspberry Pi Zero, against transformer baselines of up to 817,153 parameters that require GPU training.

cs.NE↗