From Valid to Useful: Post-Verification Acquisition for Recursive Self-Improving Recommendation

Abstract

Sequential recommenders can generate synthetic interaction sequences and retrain on the augmented corpus in a recursive self-improvement loop. To limit error accumulation, current methods verify each generated sequence remains predictive of the user's real interactions and discard those that drift away from it. Verification does not, however, determine which verified sequences should train the next model. With every verified sequence used for training, source sequences yielding more verified sequences or longer continuations have more influence, although neither quantity indicates how much those sequences will help the next model. We formulate the decision of which verified sequences are used to train the next model as \emph{post-verification acquisition} and introduce {\bf Disagreement-Aware Recursive Self-Improving Recommendation (DA-RSIR)}. DA-RSIR caps each source sequence's contribution and ranks its verified sequences by how much the model's predictions disagree over their augmented interactions. It uses a score derived from Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD) and estimated with Monte Carlo (MC) dropout. DA-RSIR requires no extra labels, teacher model, or quality scorer. Across four datasets, three recommender models, and two metrics, it improves on the retain-all approach in all $24$ comparisons and attains the highest mean in $23$ of $24$ overall; the aggregate improvement is statistically significant on both metrics. A single DA-RSIR round exceeds the retain-all approach's best gain over five recursive rounds. These findings establish post-verification acquisition as a separate control point in recursive self-improvement, separating which sequences pass verification from which verified sequences are used to train the next model.