Chance-Constrained Bi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for the Open-Pit Mining Operational Planning Problem

Ishara Hewa Pathiranage; Aneta Neumann

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.04227

Chance-Constrained Bi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for the Open-Pit Mining Operational Planning Problem

Ishara Hewa Pathiranage·Aneta Neumann

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Open-pit mining operational planning involves allocating limited resources while satisfying production, equipment, and ore-quality requirements. Existing approaches often assume deterministic ore grades or rely on simulation-based evaluation under uncertainty. In this paper, we propose a chance-constrained bi-objective formulation of the open-pit mining operational planning problem under uncertain ore grades. We aim to maximize ore production and minimize fleet cost while satisfying stochastic quality requirements through chance constraints. We model ore grades as independent normally distributed random variables and derive a deterministic reformulation of the two-sided chance constraints, avoiding sampling or simulation during fitness evaluation. We evaluate four multi-objective evolutionary algorithms on benchmark instances under different levels and structures of uncertainty. Our results show that NSGA-II and NSGA-III generally obtain the best feasible ore-production values, with NSGA-II requiring less computational time. GSEMO has the lowest computational cost but obtains feasible solutions less consistently and generally provides lower solution quality. We also observe that higher confidence and uncertainty levels reduce feasibility, with the effect depending on the uncertainty structure. The results highlight the importance of considering both the magnitude and structure of uncertainty in short-term open-pit operational planning.

Explore related subjects

cs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ishara Hewa Pathiranage, Aneta Neumann. 2026-10-03. Chance-Constrained Bi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for the Open-Pit Mining Operational Planning Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04227

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On the use of evolutionary optimization for the dynamic chance constrained open-pit mine scheduling problem

Open-pit mine scheduling is a complex real-world optimization problem that involves uncertain economic values and dynamically changing resource capacities. Evolutionary algorithms are particularly effective in these scenarios, as they can easily adapt to uncertain and changing environments. However, uncertainty and dynamic changes are often studied in isolation in real-world problems. In this paper, we study a dynamic chance-constrained open-pit mine scheduling problem in which block economic values are stochastic and mining and processing capacities vary over time. We adopt a bi-objective evolutionary formulation that simultaneously maximizes expected discounted profit and minimizes its standard deviation. To address dynamic changes, we propose a diversity-based change response mechanism that repairs a subset of infeasible solutions and introduces additional feasible solutions whenever a change is detected. We evaluate the effectiveness of this mechanism across four multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and compare it with a baseline re-evaluation-based change-response strategy. Experimental results on six mining instances demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently outperforms the baseline methods across different uncertainty levels and change frequencies.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2026

Common-Mode Errors Limit Low-Timestep Deep Spiking Q-Networks

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer sparse and event-driven computation, making them attractive for energy-constrained reinforcement learning (RL) on edge devices. In value-based RL, deep spiking Q-networks (DSQNs) combine such efficiency with action-value estimation for decision making. However, existing DSQNs often require multiple simulation timesteps for competitive performance, increasing computational and energy costs, whereas reducing the timesteps can cause substantial performance degradation. We investigate this degradation from the perspective of Q-value estimation errors. By decomposing errors across actions into common-mode and differential-mode components, we find that low-timestep DSQNs suffer disproportionately from common-mode errors shared across action values, which are particularly detrimental to temporal-difference learning through bootstrapped targets. Based on this finding, we propose Common-Mode Compensation Deep Spiking Q-Network (CMC-DSQN), which uses an auxiliary ANN to compensate for common-mode errors in the SNN outputs. At inference, greedy action selection can be performed directly from the SNN outputs, allowing the auxiliary ANN to be completely removed and preserving the energy efficiency of SNNs. Extensive experiments on Atari and MiniAtar environments demonstrate substantial performance improvements under low-timestep settings. CMC-DSQN outperforms state-of-the-art DSQN baselines by nearly $20\%$ at $T=2$ and further surpasses the ANN baseline at $T=4$.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2026

Forecast Accuracy Is Not Trading Profit: Evolving Small Recurrent Networks for Stock Return Prediction

Time series forecasting models are typically compared on pointwise error, which scores a prediction in isolation from the decision it is produced for, and a lower forecast error does not imply a better decision downstream. A parallel debate asks whether modern transformer architectures forecast better than recurrent and other lightweight models. We compare linear, fixed recurrent, transformer, and mixing based architectures against recurrent networks evolved by neuroevolutionary architecture search, evaluating each on forecast accuracy and on the net return of a daily long/short strategy. All models are fit on a pooled panel, one network trained across the whole universe. Across four mid-cap portfolios and three trading years, the evolved networks rank first on both forecast accuracy and net trading performance, while the second most accurate model loses money once positions are formed and costs are charged. The advantage tracks a horizon match, since rank IC for the evolved networks rises from a one-day to a ten-day scoring horizon while every model above 300 parameters declines. They are also the cheapest end to end: a CPU-only search of 16 minutes yields 66-weight networks that predict in 10.8~$μ$s on a Raspberry Pi Zero, against transformer baselines of up to 817,153 parameters that require GPU training.

cs.NE↗