arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.04146

Partial Identification under Imperfect Measurement: A Distributionally Robust Approach

Abstract

Imperfect measurements allow different underlying distributions to generate the same observations. Restrictions linking unobserved components can make it difficult to characterize all compatible distributions and compute the resulting range of parameter values. We ask how to construct computable parameter bounds and tighten them without additional data or stronger assumptions. We develop a general framework for partial identification under imperfect measurement based on distributionally robust optimization. We use measurement restrictions to construct a neighborhood around a benchmark distribution, ensuring that every compatible distribution lies within it. Optimizing over this neighborhood gives parameter bounds through a common procedure that can be adapted to different measurement problems. The choice of benchmark affects how informative these bounds are. We establish conditions under which changing it can tighten the bounds while preserving every parameter value consistent with the same data and assumptions. Applications to networks, missing outcomes, and regression illustrate how the framework tightens bounds and can recover the full range of compatible values.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Isaac Meza. 2026-10-02. Partial Identification under Imperfect Measurement: A Distributionally Robust Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04146

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identifying treatment effects on categorical outcomes in IV models

This paper studies population treatment effects when the outcome is unordered categorical, the treatment is binary, and the instrument is binary. I introduce an assumption called association similarity. For each instrument value, association similarity requires the odds-ratio association between potential treatment and potential outcome to be the same whether the outcome is evaluated under treatment or under no treatment. Under association similarity and a testable categorywise dominance condition, the full potential-outcome distributions are point identified. The identification is constructive and allows estimation using sample frequencies. I also consider weaker restrictions on departures from association similarity that lead to sharp partial identification. I illustrate the method with an application about the effect of insurance on health outcomes.

econ.EM↗

Robust Inference for Dyadic Data with Spatially Dependent Nodes

We develop inference for complete dyadic samples with spatial dependence governed by geographic distances between nodes, covering settings beyond the scope of existing dyadic inference theory. We propose spatial variance and corrected block jackknife estimators consistent in nondegenerate and degenerate Gaussian cases. Under degeneracy, spatial subsampling consistently estimates possibly non-Gaussian limits. Combining the jackknife with subsampling yields the max jackknifes-ubsampling (MJS) interval, which provides pointwise asymptotically exact coverage in both Gaussian cases and conservative coverage in the specified non-Gaussian case. Fixed-effect extensions show that estimating node effects can change the fast limiting distribution. Simulations and an empirical illustration are provided.

econ.EM↗

Vine Copula VAR:From Recursive Margins to Joint Forecast Inference

Joint-event forecasts often combine a dependence estimate based on past forecast errors with newly estimated marginal distributions. When each historical error retains the marginal fit available at its issue date, inference must account for an overlapping sequence of estimation errors. We derive their joint influence with the terminal forecast estimates in a stable Vine Copula VAR with normal innovation margins and a fixed, correctly specified Gaussian or positive Clayton vine. An intercept identity and the stable VAR filter reduce the historical correction to harmonically weighted innovation moments, while terminal slope uncertainty remains. The resulting covariance estimator gives asymptotically valid repeated-sample intervals for fixed one-sided event probabilities at the realized forecast state. In the Gaussian submodel, retaining issued transforms adds a positive semidefinite covariance term relative to refitting margins on the same observations. Monte Carlo simulations show that terminal-margin uncertainty is quantitatively more important than this additional term and that logit intervals improve lower-tail coverage in the designs studied. A real-time forecasting application to U.S. macroeconomic releases shows how marginal estimation contributes to uncertainty in predicted probabilities of joint contractions and identifies limitations of the stationary marginal model.

econ.EM↗