arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.03906

Vertex Cover Problem with Advice

Abstract

We study the minimum Vertex Cover problem under two non-adaptive offline advice models, where predictions about a fixed optimum solution are provided once as part of the input. These forms of prediction were introduced independently by Cohen-Addad, d'Orsi, Gupta, Lee, and Panigrahi (2024) and by Ghoshal, Makarychev, and Makarychev (2025). In Partial Predictions, independently revealed vertices come with correct membership labels. For every sufficiently small fixed $\varepsilon>0$, we give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that has expected approximation ratio at most $2-(2-o(1))\frac{\log\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\log(1/\varepsilon)}$. In Noisy Predictions, every vertex instead receives a mutually independent noisy membership label of bias $\varepsilon$. For every sufficiently small fixed $\varepsilon>0$, we give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that has expected approximation ratio at most $2-(1-o(1))\frac{\log\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\log(1/\varepsilon)}$. Our Noisy Predictions bound matches the leading asymptotic improvement below $2$ obtained by Aamand, Chen, Gollapudi, Silwal, and Wu (2025), despite using only one noisy label per vertex rather than a separate independent label for each endpoint of each incident edge. Both our bounds hold as $\varepsilon$ goes to $0$ and are strictly below $2$, the optimal approximation threshold for minimum Vertex Cover without advice under the Unique Games Conjecture, as shown by Khot and Regev (2008).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lucas de Oliveira Silva, Lehilton Lelis Chaves Pedrosa. 2026-10-02. Vertex Cover Problem with Advice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03906

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Recognizing 2-Layer and Outer $k$-Planar Graphs

The crossing number of a graph is the least number of crossings over all drawings of the graph in the plane. Computing the crossing number of a given graph is NP-hard, but fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to the natural parameter. Two well-known variants of the problem are 2-layer crossing minimization and circular crossing minimization, where every vertex must lie on one of two layers, namely two parallel lines, or a circle, respectively. Both variants are NP-hard, but FPT with respect to the natural parameter. Recently, a local version of the crossing number has also received considerable attention. A graph is $k$-planar if it admits a drawing with at most $k$ crossings per edge. In contrast to the crossing number, recognizing $k$-planar graphs is NP-hard even if $k=1$. In this paper, we consider the two above variants in the local setting. The $k$-planar graphs that admit a straight-line drawing with vertices on two layers or on a circle are called 2-layer $k$-planar and outer $k$-planar graphs, respectively. We study the parameterized complexity of the two recognition problems with respect to $k$. For $k=0$, both problems can easily be solved in linear time. Two groups independently showed that outer 1-planar graphs can also be recognized in linear time [Hong et al., Algorithmica 2015; Auer et al., Algorithmica 2016]. One group asked whether outer 2-planar graphs can be recognized in polynomial time. Our main contribution consists of XP-algorithms for recognizing 2-layer $k$-planar graphs and outer $k$-planar graphs. We complement these results by showing that both recognition problems are XNLP-hard. This implies that both problems are W$[t]$-hard for every $t$ and that it is unlikely that they admit FPT-algorithms. On the other hand, we present an FPT-algorithm for recognizing 2-layer $k$-planar graphs where the order of the vertices on one layer is specified.

cs.DS↗

A simple $(2+ε)$-approximation for knapsack interdiction

In the knapsack interdiction problem, there are $n$ items, each with a non-negative profit, interdiction cost, and packing weight. There is also an interdiction budget and a capacity. The objective is to select a set of items to interdict (delete) subject to the budget which minimizes the maximum profit attainable by packing the remaining items subject to the capacity. We present a $(2+ε)$-approximation running in $O(n^3ε^{-1}\log(ε^{-1}\log\sum_i p_i))$ time, where $p_i$ is the profit of item $i$. Although a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) is already known for this problem, our algorithm is considerably simpler and faster. The approach also generalizes naturally to a $(1+t+ε)$-approximation for $t$-dimensional knapsack interdiction with running time $O(n^{t+2}ε^{-1}\log(ε^{-1}\log\sum_i p_i))$. In computational experiments on standard benchmark instances with $ε=1$, our algorithm is on average within 0.4% of optimal and over 20 times faster than a state-of-the-art exact algorithm.

cs.DS↗

A Complexity Dichotomy for Edge Subdivision to $H$-Free Graphs

For a fixed graph $H$, \HFS\ asks whether at most $k$ edge subdivisions can make an input graph contain no induced copy of $H$. We establish a complexity dichotomy for every fixed nonempty $H$: the problem is polynomial-time solvable if every component of $H$ is a subdivided star or a subdivided bistar and at most one component is a subdivided bistar; it is NP-complete otherwise. In every NP-complete case, the Exponential Time Hypothesis rules out a $2^{o(k)}n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm. For every fixed $H$, the problem admits a $2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm.

cs.DS↗