arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.03440

Quantifying Ethereum Energy Consumption via Network Mapping

Yahn Costa Hackspacher·Cornelius Ihle·Vasundhara Shaw·Dennis Trautwein·Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann·Bela Gipp·Moritz Schubotz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Ethereum's electricity use fell by about 99.95% after the move from proof of work to proof of stake. Service providers still need to report operational energy use, e.g. under the EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). Existing estimates either apply one typical wattage to every node or start from aggregated monitoring counts. Both ignore attributes that nodes already advertise on the peer-to-peer network: client software, ARM or x86 hardware, hosting location, and validator role. We crawl the consensus and execution layers, assign each peer a wattage from those attributes using published measurements, and estimate the remaining incomplete peers with a Random Forest. On 6,934 peers from two Nebula crawls (19 and 22 June 2026), reachable nodes sum to 415 kW, or 3.63 GWh if that draw were held for a year. The same Lighthouse+Nethermind x86 wattage on every peer yields 431 kW. Observed attributes lower the total by 3.9%, mainly because nodes at Hetzner and other non-AWS clouds draw less than that home-desktop figure. AWS accounts for 15.6% of watts from 12.2% of peers, and validator-flagged nodes for 31.4% of watts from 25.7% of peers. The 415 kW snapshot is about 46% of the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) estimate of about 0.90 MW. Both use about 60 W per node, so the gap is mostly how many nodes each estimate includes. Rules cover 3,110 peers and the forest the other 3,824. On held-out labeled peers with client, architecture, and OS hidden, the forest's mean absolute error against the rule wattage is 4.3 W. Twenty-four-hour measurements on a gaming desktop differ from the predictions. After subtracting a 33 W idle graphics card that Ethereum clients do not need, both differences fall to about 19%.

Explore related subjects

cs.CYcs.CR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yahn Costa Hackspacher, Cornelius Ihle, Vasundhara Shaw, Dennis Trautwein, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann, Bela Gipp, Moritz Schubotz. 2026-10-02. Quantifying Ethereum Energy Consumption via Network Mapping. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03440

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

"Lighting The Way For Those Not Here": How Can Technology Researchers Help Resist the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives (MMIR) Crisis?

Indigenous peoples across Turtle Island face disproportionate rates of disappearance and murder, a genocide rooted in settler-colonial violence and systemic erasure. Technology plays a crucial role in the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives (MMIR) crisis: it perpetuates systemic violence and impedes investigations, yet also enables sites of advocacy, healing, and resistance. For example, Native communities utilize AMBER alerts, digital news, sovereign crowdsourced databases, social media groups, and resistance movements to mobilize searches, amplify awareness, and honor missing relatives. Yet little research in HCI has critically examined the role of technology in shaping the MMIR crisis. Thus, we qualitatively analyze 140 webpages to identify sociotechnical barriers that hinder communities' efforts, while highlighting actions that foster healing, safety, and resilience. We grounded our analysis in stories that resist epistemic erasure through relational accountability, critical humility, cultural sensitivity, and refusal. Finally, we provide recommendations for HCI to recognize self-determination and sovereignty of Indigenous technologies, direct action to support families, and honor Indigenous onto-epistemologies that cease epistemic violence.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

The impacts of artificial intelligence on environmental sustainability and human well-being

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being described as a transformative general-purpose technology, yet its impacts on environmental sustainability and human well-being remain poorly understood. Here, we conduct a systematic review of 1,291 studies selected from 6,655 records to map how the literature assesses these impacts. We find that current research provides a fragmented and uneven account of AI's consequences for human well-being and the environment. Environmental studies focus narrowly on energy use and CO2 emissions (72%) and rarely consider systemic effects (11%), while well-being studies are predominantly conceptual and overlook subjective well-being, cognitive capabilities, and upstream supply-chain impacts. Strikingly, 82% of environmental studies portray AI's impacts as positive, but this finding is driven by the large number of application-level studies. Well-being analyses show a near-even split (44% positive; 46% negative). However, this split masks differences across well-being dimensions: impacts on income and health are generally expected to be positive, whereas impacts on inequality, social cohesion, and employment are expected to be negative. Based on our findings, we identify important priorities for future research: environmental assessments should consider systemic effects and indicators beyond energy and CO2, while well-being research should prioritise empirical analysis. More fundamentally, research must consider environmental sustainability and human well-being together, recognising that AI's impacts are deeply interconnected. Towards this aim, we extend an existing three-level framework for the climate impacts of AI to include broader environmental impacts and human well-being, providing a unified basis to assess AI impacts and guide its development towards environmental sustainability and human flourishing.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

A Semi-Automated System for Generating Dialogue-Based TTS Lessons Using Large Language Models: An Exploratory Study of Educational Potential

This study proposes a semi-automated system for generating dialogue-based lessons using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Text-to-Speech (TTS) technology, and exploratorily examines its educational potential via a practical quasi-experiment. The system augments rather than replaces educators through a three-stage human-in-the-loop workflow (LLM-based slide/narration generation, educator review, automated audiovisual integration), and introduces a novel method for generating Expert-Novice dialogue narration based on cognitive apprenticeship theory. In a study of 245 first-year high school students who sequentially experienced three lesson formats (instructor voice, single-speaker TTS, dialogue TTS; content differed across sessions, limiting format/content separation), we conducted within-subject (Friedman test, N<=183) and repeated cross-sectional (Mann-Whitney U, N=229/206) analyses. TTS audio did not substantially degrade the learning experience versus instructor voice, supported by TOST equivalence testing. Dialogue TTS was significantly superior to single TTS in comprehension (p=.006, q=.025) and cognitive engagement (p=.019, q=.048); enjoyment was non-significant after FDR correction (q=.081) but reached significance after controlling for prior knowledge (proportional-odds model, OR=1.65, q=.025), and these advantages were not attributable to prior-knowledge imbalance. Conversely, single TTS was superior in audio naturalness (p<.001, q<.001, r=-.238), revealing a trade-off between dialogue's benefits and higher extraneous cognitive load. Dialogue format was preferred by 66.9% of learners as most enjoyable (p<.001). These results reflect a fixed-order design; replication is needed before generalizing them as effects of lesson format. This study provides a theoretical and empirical basis for the educational acceptability of TTS audio and for TTS lesson-format design.

cs.CY↗