arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.03155

Aggregate accuracy conceals concentrated temporal vulnerability in a spiking speech classifier

İsmail Can Dikmen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Aggregate accuracy cannot reveal which utterances are locally vulnerable or how internal activity changes when labels remain stable. We retain every prediction for 725,070 adjacent-bin, one-count changes around 100 validation utterances of a frozen SpikeSCR-based classifier. The canonical native-horizon GPU singleton path reaches 86.0836% validation accuracy. Equal-source expected accuracy under a uniformly chosen neighbor rises from 84.00% to 84.54%, although 13 of 84 initially correct sources admit adverse neighbors. Five sources carry 93.21% of adverse moves. Margin-guided and surrogate-gradient searches miss sparse cases at fixed query budgets; a post hoc gradient prefix finds all 13 at 73.45% of the census of initially correct sources. Source-matched traces and clean-state interventions distinguish internal change from harmful direction and recoverability. Two count-readout replicas have similar validation accuracies but a 5.21-fold class-change gap concentrated in four sources. Controlled query/key source isolation eliminates 531 batch-order label changes and restores bitwise order invariance across all 9,981 validation score vectors. Isolated batch predictions reproduce padding-matched singleton labels on 9,980 of 9,981 inputs. Paired CPU/GPU replay of all 25,820 class-changing neighbors gives 99.8993% label agreement and preserves all 13 vulnerable sources and their fixed witnesses. Complete source-conditioned maps distinguish vulnerability incidence, concentration, internal change, and execution dependence that aggregate accuracy leaves unresolved.

Explore related subjects

cs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

İsmail Can Dikmen. 2026-10-02. Aggregate accuracy conceals concentrated temporal vulnerability in a spiking speech classifier. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03155

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Encoding and Decoding Temporal Signals with Spiking Bandpass Wavelets

Spike-based encodings are sparse and energy-efficient. However, previous theory for such spiking representations is largely disconnected from most signal processing literature and does not extend to multi-scale frames. We recast spike-encoders as time-causal overcomplete wavelet frames with closed-form bandwidth tiling and reconstruction error bounds. We show that scale covariance, frame bounds, and reconstruction guarantees hold for any finite-energy input in both encoding and decoding steps. The proposed spiking bandpass wavelets preserve the sparsity and locality of spiking representations: A threshold parameter sets the event rate, and the reconstruction error grows linearly with it, up to spike quantization and time discretization. On ECG and audio datasets, we reach reconstruction accuracy comparable to continuous wavelet transforms, multi-channel integrate-and-fire time encoding machines, and Sigma-Delta modulation. The experiments demonstrate robustness of the proposed spiking bandpass wavelets to noise and spike-time jitter, and that the spike activity shifts across channels as predicted by the covariance property under temporal rescaling. Every operation reduces to a leaky integrate-and-fire difference with thresholding, and both the encoder and the decoder map directly to existing neuromorphic hardware.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

Continual Reinforcement Learning with Neuroevolution

Despite many studies about causes and remedies of plasticity loss in Reinforcement Learning (RL) under continual task changes, no RL method has yet consistently achieved a good balance between adaptation and forgetting. Here we turn to an alternative optimization paradigm, neuroevolution (NE): algorithms that search directly in weight space through mutation and selection over a population of neural networks. Across a wide array of environments and environmental changes, with policies ranging from a few hundred parameters to million-parameter networks, we compare evolution strategies (ES) and genetic algorithms (GAs) against state-of-the-art continual RL variants and population-based RL. ES most consistently achieves a good stability-plasticity trade-off, while the GA is the most plastic method but forgets more than ES. To explain this, we study the return landscape around each method's solutions. ES finds the widest neighborhoods, i.e.\ regions of weight space in which perturbed policies still solve the task, and the size of the overlap between the neighborhoods of consecutive tasks correlates with a method's stability-plasticity trade-off. Rewarding behavioral diversity in a GA through novelty search makes the population even more plastic, at the cost of forgetting. Finally, symptoms of plasticity loss commonly reported in RL do not transfer to NE. Overall, these results establish NE as a competitive alternative to RL under continual task changes, and suggest that training under perturbations in weight space may be a useful mechanism for continual learning more broadly.

cs.NE↗
arXiv2026

Evolutionary Computation for Trustworthy AI: From Attacks and Defenses to Self-Evolving Era

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved from task-specific models to foundation models and agents, the scope of trustworthy AI has expanded from model-level robustness to the reliability and safety of broader AI systems. This evolution has also expanded the attack surface from individual models to broader system-level interactions, including tool use, context, and interaction trajectories with dynamic environments. As a result, maintaining reliable and safe behavior under changing or deliberately manipulated conditions has become increasingly challenging. The search for effective attacks and defenses often relies on black-box feedback to navigate discrete choices among words, actions, system components, or their combinations. Multiple objectives and expensive candidate evaluations further limit what can be explored. Evolutionary Computation (EC), with its population-based, gradient-free search and flexible variation and selection mechanisms, is well suited to these settings. This survey reviews how EC has been applied to trustworthy AI across three directions: evolutionary attacks, evolutionary defenses, and trustworthy self-evolving AI systems. Unlike prior reviews that treat trustworthy AI, EC, and self-evolving systems largely separately, we connect these lines through a common evolutionary perspective. For self-evolving AI, we examine how trustworthiness governs the generation and retention of updates that shape subsequent adaptation. We further synthesize evaluation methods and benchmark resources from both trustworthiness and evolutionary-search perspectives. Finally, we discuss key challenges and future research directions toward more effective and reliable use of EC in trustworthy AI.

cs.NE↗