arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.02775

Automatic Evaluation of Mental Health Stigma in Online Communication

Naomi Baes·Jemima Kang·Nick Haslam·Chris Groot·Alsa Wu·Luc Raszewski·Yulia Otmakhova
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mental health stigma has profoundly harmful impacts but its complexity makes it difficult to evaluate. Stigma may involve explicit derogation, but also subtler forms of blame, fear, paternalistic pity, social distancing, structural exclusion, and discrimination. We introduce a theory-grounded benchmark for automatic evaluation of mental health stigma in online communication, consisting of naturally occurring online news and social media text annotated with a fine-grained taxonomy of stigma across multiple mental health conditions. Our annotation framework comprises a binary stigma-detection task and a multi-level taxonomy covering (i) stigma mode, (ii) domain, and (iii) specific components of certain forms of stigma. We apply this framework to texts mentioning six mental health conditions and evaluate large language models alongside stigma-related classifiers for detecting sentiment, toxicity, and hate speech. Results show that mental health stigma is not well captured by models trained to detect these neighboring constructs, and that LLMs often overpredict stigma unless given explicit operational rules - mirroring the importance of decision rules in human annotation. We release the publicly available part of benchmark, annotations, prototypical exemplars of stigma and code at: https://github.com/jemimakang/mh_stigma.

Explore related subjects

cs.CL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Naomi Baes, Jemima Kang, Nick Haslam, Chris Groot, Alsa Wu, Luc Raszewski, Yulia Otmakhova. 2026-10-02. Automatic Evaluation of Mental Health Stigma in Online Communication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02775

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

ETHER: Aligning Emergent Communication for Hindsight Experience Replay

Hindsight Experience Replay (HER) enhances sample efficiency in goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) by relabelling failed trajectories with goals that were actually achieved. However, HER implicitly assumes access to a goal relabelling function and a predicate function that determines whether a goal has been satisfied. These assumptions break down in instruction-following tasks, where goals are expressed in natural language and differ from the state space. We formalize this as the Hindsight Reinforcement Learning problem, which shows the need to jointly learn these functions alongside the RL policy. To address it, we propose ETHER (Emergent Textual Hindsight Experience Replay), an agent that leverages Emergent Communication to learn the goal-relabelling and predicate functions. ETHER uses a referential game (RG) to train a speaker and a listener to develop a grounded, artificial language describing environment states. It partially aligns this emergent language with instruction language using co-occurrence patterns between task instructions and RL observations. We prove that the relabelling and predicate functions that ETHER derives from the RG avoid the degenerate solutions of the Hindsight RL problem, namely trivial predicates and collapsed relabelling functions. Experiments on BabyAI's PickupDist task show that ETHER's learned RG speaker and listener can function as the goal relabelling and predicate functions of HER, improving sample efficiency despite imperfect language alignment. Our work bridges Emergent Communication and goal-conditioned RL, opening the door to wider applications of HER.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Automatic register identification for the open web using multilingual deep learning

This article presents multilingual deep learning models for identifying web registers -- text varieties such as news reports and discussion forums -- across 16 languages. We introduce the Multilingual CORE corpora, which contain over 72,000 documents annotated with a hierarchical taxonomy of 25 registers designed to cover the entire open web. Using multi-label classification, our best model achieves 79% F1 averaged across languages, matching or exceeding previous studies that used simpler classification schemes. This demonstrates that models can perform well even with a complex register scheme at multilingual scale. However, we observe a consistent performance ceiling across all models and configurations. When we remove documents with uncertain labels through data pruning, performance increases to over 90% F1, suggesting that this ceiling stems from inherent ambiguity in web registers rather than model limitations. Analysis of hybrid texts (those combining multiple registers) reveals that the main challenge lies not in classifying hybrids themselves, but in distinguishing hybrid from non-hybrid documents. Multilingual models consistently outperform monolingual ones, particularly for languages with limited training data. Zero-shot performance on unseen languages drops by an average of 7%, though this varies by language (3--8%), indicating that while registers share features across languages, they also retain language-specific characteristics.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating the Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) generally enhances large language models' (LLMs) ability to solve knowledge-intensive tasks. But RAG could also lead to performance degradation due to imperfect retrieval and the model's limited ability to leverage retrieved content. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of LLMs in practical RAG setups (henceforth retrieval robustness). We focus on three research questions: (1) whether RAG is always better than non-RAG; (2) whether more retrieved documents always lead to better performance; and (3) whether document order impacts results. To facilitate this study, we establish a benchmark of 1,891 samples spanning five datasets across three task categories, each with documents retrieved using both sparse and dense retrievers. We introduce three robustness metrics, each corresponding to one research question. Our experiments across 11 LLMs show that models achieve generally high retrieval robustness, but robustness varies substantially across tasks, suggesting that the decision to adopt RAG remains a case-by-case consideration. We further examine four additional prompting strategies that vary how models interact with retrieved documents. We find that Qwen and GPT models suffer notable robustness declines when reasoning is disabled, even on single-hop QA tasks, and that providing retrieved documents as tool responses improves Claude models but hurts Qwen and GPT models, highlighting potential issues of the GPT models regardless of their best overall robustness under vanilla prompting.

cs.CL↗