arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.02443

Counterexamples for Rational Points Near Curves

Abstract

Let $δ\in [0,1/2]$ and $Q\geq 1$. Given a compact $C^{\infty}$-curve $\mathcal{C}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, denote by $N_{\mathcal{C}}(δ, Q)$ the number of pairs $(\mathbf{a}, q)\in \mathbb{Z}^n\times [Q/2,Q]$ such that the rational point $\mathbf{a}/q$ is $δ/q$-close to $\mathcal{C}$. We investigate the range of $δ$ in terms of $Q$ which is necessary for the heuristic $N_{\mathcal{C}}(δ, Q)\asympδ^{n-1}Q^2$ to be correct for the moment curve. For a nondegenerate curve $\mathcal{C}\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ and for sufficiently large $Q$, Hickman and the second author previously established that $N_{\mathcal{C}}(δ, Q)\lesssim_ν δ^{n-1}Q^2$ for all $δ\in[Q^{α(n+1)+ν},1/2)$ and any $ν>0$. Here $α(n)=-4n^{-2}+O(n^{-3})$ was explicitly computed. We show that this range is surprisingly close to being sharp in the asymptotic sense as $n\to\infty$, and can at most be extended to $δ\in[Q^{α(n)},1/2)$. In particular, the sharp exponent can only be about $O(n^{-3})$ better, even though it was widely believed before that an improvement of $O(n^{-1})$ should be possible. The complementary upper bound in this remaining range has been recently established by Gan--Guo--Oh.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mingfeng Chen, Rajula Srivastava, Niclas Technau. 2026-10-01. Counterexamples for Rational Points Near Curves. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02443

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

New Results for Euler Sums

We present a large number of analytic evaluations of Euler sums, namely sums such as \begin{align} M(m,n_0,n_1,n_2, \ldots, n_t) &= \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{H(k)^m}{k^{n_0} (k+1)^{n_1} (k+2)^{n_2} \cdots (k+t)^{n_t}}, \nonumber \end{align} for nonnegative integers $m$ and $(n_i)$, with $m \geq 1$ and $n_0 + n_1 + \cdots + n_t \geq 2$, where $H(k) = \sum_{j=1}^k 1/j$ is the harmonic function. These results were obtained either by algebraic manipulations, or else by very high-precision numerical evaluations combined with an integer relation algorithm to obtain the analytic formulas. We show how many of these results can be derived from a few basic facts, and that these techniques are applicable to Euler sums of even more general forms than the above cases. We then show that these results permit the calculation of constants for Euler sums resembling the Stieltjes $γ$ constants arising in the theory of the Riemann zeta function, and we also present some preliminary results on the asymptotic behavior of these constants. A sign error has been corrected in eq. 98.

math.NT↗

The moments of split greatest common divisors

Sequences of the form $(\gcd(u_n,v_n))_{n \in \mathbb N}$, with $(u_n)_n$, $(v_n)_n$ sums of $S$-units, have been considered by several authors. The study of $\gcd(n,u_n)$ corresponds, after Silverman, to divisibility sequences arising from the algebraic group $\mathbb G_{\mathrm{a}} \times \mathbb G_{\mathrm{m}}$; in this case, Sanna determined all asymptotic moments of the arithmetic function $\log\,\gcd (n,u_n)$ when $(u_n)_n$ is a Lucas sequence. Here, we characterize the asymptotic behavior of the moments themselves $\sum_{n \leq x}\,\gcd(n,u_n)^λ$, thus solving the moment problem for $\mathbb G_{\mathrm{a}} \times \mathbb G_{\mathrm{m}}$. We give both unconditional and conditional results, the latter only relying on standard conjectures in analytic number theory.

math.NT↗