arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.02269

Confidence-Gated Cloud-Edge Cascade Triage via Variational Risk Minimization for Medical Imaging

Xinye Yang·Zhusi Zhong·Scott Collins·Michael Bernstein·Grayson Baird·Terrence Healey·Michael Atalay·Mahesh Jayaraman·Xuyu Wang·Zhicheng Jiao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Emergency chest X-ray (CXR) triage has a structural modality gap: reports arrive after triage decisions, yet multimodal foundation models require image-text inputs. We present Variational Risk Minimization (VRM), a distillation framework that treats LVLM-generated report variants as Monte Carlo samples of latent clinical interpretations. Rather than distilling from a single teacher target, VRM learns from a variationally marginalized teacher distribution, enabling uncertainty-aware supervision under missing-modality constraints. Under matched encoder families, VRM outperforms direct fine-tuning baselines and improves calibration with strong recovery from hallucinated supervision. Marginalized supervision reduces report-selection instability. In our compact edge-student instantiation, a confidence-gated cascade reaches AUC 0.941 at 103ms average latency with 20.3% cloud escalation, yielding an explicit reliability-latency operating point for cloud-edge clinical workflows.

Explore related subjects

eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xinye Yang, Zhusi Zhong, Scott Collins, Michael Bernstein, Grayson Baird, Terrence Healey, Michael Atalay, Mahesh Jayaraman, Xuyu Wang, Zhicheng Jiao. 2026-10-01. Confidence-Gated Cloud-Edge Cascade Triage via Variational Risk Minimization for Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2026.100689

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Unified Deep Learning Framework for Motion Correction in Medical Imaging

Deep learning has shown significant value in medical image registration for motion correction; however, current techniques are either limited by the type and range of motion they can handle or require iterative inference and/or retraining for new imaging data. To address these limitations, we introduce UniMo, a Unified Motion Correction framework that uses deep neural networks to correct various types of motion in medical imaging. UniMo uses an alternating optimization scheme with a unified loss function to train an integrated model of 1) an equivariant neural network for global rigid motion correction and 2) an encoder-decoder network for local deformations. It features a geometric deformation augmenter that 1) enhances the robustness of global motion correction by addressing local deformations, whether caused by non-rigid motion or geometric distortions, and 2) generates augmented data to improve training. As a hybrid model that uses both image intensities and shapes, UniMo is robust to appearance variations and generalizes to various imaging modalities without retraining. We trained and tested UniMo for motion tracking in fetal magnetic resonance imaging, which is challenging due to 1) both large rigid and non-rigid motion and 2) large variations in image appearance. We then tested the trained model, without retraining, on three public datasets: MedMNIST, lung CT, and BraTS. UniMo surpassed existing motion correction methods in accuracy and, notably, enabled one-time training on a single modality while maintaining high stability and adaptability across multiple unseen imaging datasets. By offering a unified solution to motion correction, UniMo marks a significant advance in challenging applications with a mixture of bulk motion and local deformations. Code is available at https://github.com/IntelligentImaging/UNIMO

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

MedForj: An open, large-scale foundational generative prior for high-resolution 3D brain MRI

This work introduces MedForj, a suite of 3D foundational generative priors based on diffusion models. The MedForj models were trained on $72{,}659$ 1~mm isotropic 3D $T_1$-weighted MRI human brain image volumes from $38{,}174$ subjects, drawn from a curated corpus of $80{,}675$ volumes from $42{,}506$ subjects spanning $38$ publicly available datasets. These training images were manually inspected to exclude those with poor quality and excessive pathology, and otherwise were minimally processed. The models include six different diffusion training strategies: rectified flow, latent diffusion rectified flow, flow matching, velocity prediction, clean prediction, and noise prediction. Image samples produced by each of these models were compared to each other and against real, ground truth data under downstream segmentation distributions, FID, five inverse problems, and blind human inspection in an observer study. Flow matching was the strongest strategy overall, achieving the best inverse problem solving results at $28.80$~dB PSNR and $0.874$ SSIM averaged over the five forward problems, the highest rate of reconstructions judged real by blind human raters at $72.6\%$, and the closest per-structure match to real segmented anatomy in a permutation test. It was not best everywhere: rectified flow produced the most convincing unconditional samples in the observer study and the best FID, and the latent rectified-flow model achieved the smallest joint distributional distance to real anatomy. No other strategy, however, performed consistently well across all four evaluations. We therefore recommend flow matching as the default MedForj prior, while releasing every strategy so that the choice can be revisited per application. All model weights and corresponding code are publicly available at https://github.com/piksl-research/medforj.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2026

Gaussian Surrogates for Poisson Imaging: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results

In imaging inverse problems with Poisson-distributed measurements, it is common to use objectives derived from the Poisson likelihood. But performance is often evaluated by mean squared error (MSE), which raises a practical question: how much does a Poisson objective matter for MSE, even at low dose? We analyze the MSE of Poisson and Gaussian surrogate reconstruction objectives under Poisson noise. In a stylized diagonal model, we show that the unregularized Poisson maximum-likelihood estimator can incur large MSE at low dose, while Poisson MAP mitigates this instability through regularization. We then study two Gaussian surrogate objectives: a heteroscedastic quadratic objective motivated by the normal approximation of Poisson data, and a homoscedastic quadratic objective that yields a simple linear estimator. We show that both surrogates can achieve MSE comparable to Poisson MAP in the low-dose regime, despite departing from the Poisson likelihood. Numerical computed tomography experiments indicate that these conclusions extend beyond the stylized setting of our theoretical analysis.

eess.IV↗