arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.01424

DRL-driven RAN Slicing Management: A V2X-oriented Approach In Multi-service Scenarios

Abstract

The integration of Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communications is driving a profound transformation in vehicular connectivity, expected to significantly enhance traffic efficiency and safety. However, the stringent requirements of V2X services, particularly ultra-low latency and high reliability, present significant technical challenges. 5G's Network Slicing emerges as a key enabler by providing tailored virtual networks that ensure isolation and adaptability for heterogeneous services. This work proposes an intelligent Radio Access Network (RAN) slicing management framework specifically designed for scenarios where safety-critical V2X and high-capacity eMBB slices coexist. In such complex environments, harmonizing conflicting traffic requirements demands continuous, data-driven optimization. To achieve this, the proposed framework leverages an advanced Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approach which dynamically optimizes resource allocation in real time. The framework is empirically validated on a real 5G Standalone (SA) network, where experimental results demonstrate that the DRL-driven approach successfully balances both objectives, outperforming traditional static and proportional allocation strategies by minimizing SLA violations while ensuring high resource utilization for eMBB slices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel E. Garcia-Fernandez, Pablo Vera-Soto, Sergio Fortes, M. Martinez, I. de-la-Bandera, M. L. Luque, A. Mendo, J. Ramiro, Raquel Barco. 2026-10-01. DRL-driven RAN Slicing Management: A V2X-oriented Approach In Multi-service Scenarios. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01424

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

End-to-end Modeling and Optimization of Timing and Energy in Wireless IoT Systems

With the advent of edge computing, data generated by end devices can be pre-processed before transmission, possibly saving transmission time and energy. On the other hand, data processing itself incurs latency and energy consumption, depending on the complexity of the computing operations and the speed of the processor. The energy-latency-reliability profile resulting from the concatenation of pre-processing operations (specifically, data compression) and data transmission is particularly relevant in wireless communication services, whose requirements may change dramatically with the application domain. In this paper, we study this multi-dimensional optimization problem, introducing a simple model to investigate the tradeoff among end-to-end latency, reliability, and energy consumption when considering compression and communication operations in a constrained wireless device. We then study the Pareto fronts of the energy-latency trade-off, considering data compression ratio and device processing speed as key design variables. Our results show that the energy costs grows exponentially with the reduction of the end-to-end latency, so that considerable energy saving can be obtained by slightly relaxing the latency requirements of applications. These findings challenge conventional rigid communication latency targets, advocating instead for application-specific end-to-end latency budgets that account for computational and transmission overhead.

cs.NI↗

Optimal Oblivious Load-Balancing for Sparse Traffic in Large-Scale Satellite Networks

Oblivious load-balancing in networks involves routing traffic from sources to destinations using predetermined routes independent of the traffic, so that the maximum load on any link in the network is minimized. We investigate oblivious load-balancing schemes for a $N\times N$ torus network under sparse traffic where there are at most $k$ active source-destination pairs. We are motivated by the problem of load-balancing in large-scale LEO satellite networks, which can be modelled as a torus, where the traffic is known to be sparse and localized to certain hotspot areas. We formulate the problem as a linear program and show that no oblivious routing scheme can achieve a worst-case load lower than approximately $\frac{\sqrt{2k}}{4}$ when $1<k \leq N^2/2$ and $\frac{N}{4}$ when $N^2/2\leq k\leq N^2$. Moreover, we demonstrate that the celebrated Valiant Load Balancing scheme is suboptimal under sparse traffic and construct an optimal oblivious load-balancing scheme that achieves the lower bound. Further, we discover a $\sqrt{2}$ multiplicative gap between the worst-case load of a non-oblivious routing and the worst-case load of any oblivious routing. The results can also be extended to general $N\times M$ tori with unequal link capacities along the vertical and horizontal directions.

cs.NI↗

SAFE: Spatially-Aware Feedback Enhancement for Fault-Tolerant Trust Management in Event-Based VANETs

In event-based trust management for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), vehicles that witness a road event broadcast its state, and vehicles that later witness the same event score the earlier broadcasters in feedback reports sent to a central decision unit (CDU). When the event state changes, an honest vehicle that reported the previous state receives negative feedback, as the evaluator compares an out-of-date message with the new state. This stale-witness problem is hypothesised to be a major source of unfair penalisation of honest vehicles. To address it, SAFE (Spatially-Aware Feedback Enhancement) is proposed. In SAFE, vehicles continue to record event messages after their decision and throughout the witness area, and send an updated feedback report when they leave it. SAFE was compared with the trust cascading-based emergency message dissemination model (TCEMD) in attack-free highway scenarios simulated with OMNeT++, Veins and Simulation of Urban MObility (SUMO). In the single-event scenario, the negative-feedback rate in the two update rounds after the state change decreased from 53.8% to 24.7% and from 55.6% to 8.3%, and the number of distinct honest vehicles blacklisted decreased from 20 to 6. In the multi-event scenario, the negative-feedback rate remained at or below 1.3% in SAFE, compared with up to 77.6% in TCEMD, and the share of trust evaluations ending in an untrusted label decreased from 22.7% to at most 1.7%. These gains required 2.3 to 5.0 times more feedback entries. Experiments with two decision distances showed that a shorter gap between the decision and witness distances reduced stale feedback in both schemes, supporting the stale-witness hypothesis

cs.NI↗