Inherited Learning in an Artificial Ecology: How Controls and Update Allocation Shape Benefits

Xuening Wu; Lei Li; Shan Yu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.01232

Inherited Learning in an Artificial Ecology: How Controls and Update Allocation Shape Benefits

Xuening Wu·Lei Li·Shan Yu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Learning can improve an individual's behavior, yet a population risks losing that experience whenever individuals die and are replaced. Inheriting learned preferences offers a way to preserve useful behavior across generations, raising a question for artificial populations: when does inheritance improve collective performance, and how can its benefits be measured fairly? The challenge is that inheritance changes not only offspring behavior but also survival, reproduction, and opportunities for further hereditary updates. Random controls with equal update magnitudes may therefore yield misleading comparisons if they alter different states or obey different stability constraints. We investigate this problem in a resource-limited artificial ecology, combining structured random controls with interventions on newborn preferences and the allocation of hereditary updates. Preserving the state structure of random updates substantially narrows the apparent inheritance advantage, while a conditional establishment-speed benefit remains. Preference erasure and faster-learning compensation support a contribution from reduced offspring relearning. Update allocation also changes the comparison: event quotas and common time cutoffs can reverse rankings, although they also change realized update amounts. With update count and cumulative magnitudes matched, staged release improves occupancy but does not achieve the prespecified establishment criterion. These findings provide a framework for distinguishing the value of inherited preferences from the effects of control design and update allocation, clarifying how inherited learning should be evaluated in artificial populations.

Explore related subjects

cs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Xuening Wu, Lei Li, Shan Yu. 2026-10-01. Inherited Learning in an Artificial Ecology: How Controls and Update Allocation Shape Benefits. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01232

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

LESS: Lightweight Evolutionary Supernet Search in Minutes

Low-cost NAS must both explore high-performing architectures and identify them reliably, yet reducing evaluation cost often weakens the fidelity of candidate comparisons. Training-free methods reduce evaluation cost by replacing learned task feedback with proxy signals measured at initialization. We introduce LESS (Lightweight Evolutionary Supernet Search), a data-driven method that combines a brief fair hard-path warm-up with discrete search under a single CMA-ES distribution. Each proposal is evaluated as its decoded hard genotype after six candidate-conditioned supernet updates. On NAS-Bench-201, LESS achieves \(93.189\pm0.467\%\) CIFAR-10 test accuracy in 409.1 seconds, coming within 0.04 percentage points of FairNAS using approximately \(1/24\) of its source-reported search time. Matched controls show that calibration improves selected validation accuracy by \(0.577\) percentage points while changing best-visited accuracy by only \(0.054\) points, indicating that its primary effect is to reduce selection regret. The frozen configuration transfers without tuning to CIFAR-100 and ImageNet16-120 with \(69.615\pm1.139\%\) and \(43.720\pm1.697\%\) accuracy. Applied without tuning to the larger DARTS space, LESS achieves \(96.95\pm0.14\%\) on CIFAR-10 and \(82.43\pm0.80\%\) on CIFAR-100, with each search completing in approximately 43.5 minutes on a single GPU. Together, these results show that short, balanced, data-dependent updates enable competitive neural architecture search across datasets and search spaces within minutes.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2026

Controllable Stochastic Quantization Encoding for Adversarially Robust Spiking Neural Networks

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have attracted increasing attention due to their impressive temporal dynamics, energy efficiency, and brain-inspired mechanisms. Although SNNs have demonstrated promising performance in image classification tasks, recent studies have shown that they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where imperceptible perturbations are added to input images to mislead model predictions. Existing defense methods mainly focus on training strategies, while the role of input encoding remains less explored. An observation is that the robustness advantage of Poisson encoding over direct encoding may benefit from its inherent randomness. Motivated by this, we propose a stochastic quantization encoding method that encodes the input image with controllable randomness adjusted by the quantization scale, thereby improving the adversarial robustness of SNNs. We further show that this method constitutes a general framework that reduces to both Poisson encoding and direct encoding under different choices of the quantization scale. Since it enhances robustness at the input encoding stage, it can be combined with existing training-based defenses for further gains. Experimental results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed stochastic quantization encoding method. To sum up, this work highlights the importance of input encoding for the adversarial robustness of SNNs, providing a new perspective for understanding and improving it.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2026

Continual Reinforcement Learning with Neuroevolution

Despite many studies about causes and remedies of plasticity loss in Reinforcement Learning (RL) under continual task changes, no RL method has yet consistently achieved a good balance between adaptation and forgetting. Here we turn to an alternative optimization paradigm, neuroevolution (NE): algorithms that search directly in weight space through mutation and selection over a population of neural networks. Across a wide array of environments and environmental changes, with policies ranging from a few hundred parameters to million-parameter networks, we compare evolution strategies (ES) and genetic algorithms (GAs) against state-of-the-art continual RL variants and population-based RL. ES most consistently achieves a good stability-plasticity trade-off, while the GA is the most plastic method but forgets more than ES. To explain this, we study the return landscape around each method's solutions. ES finds the widest neighborhoods, i.e.\ regions of weight space in which perturbed policies still solve the task, and the size of the overlap between the neighborhoods of consecutive tasks correlates with a method's stability-plasticity trade-off. Rewarding behavioral diversity in a GA through novelty search makes the population even more plastic, at the cost of forgetting. Finally, symptoms of plasticity loss commonly reported in RL do not transfer to NE. Overall, these results establish NE as a competitive alternative to RL under continual task changes, and suggest that training under perturbations in weight space may be a useful mechanism for continual learning more broadly.

cs.NE↗