arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.00159

Maximin Share Allocations Beyond Weakly Lexicographic Valuations

Abstract

We study the fair division of indivisible goods among agents with nonnegative additive valuations. An agent's maximin share (MMS) is the value she can guarantee by partitioning the goods into as many bundles as there are agents and receiving a least-valued bundle. We prove the existence of exact MMS allocations for a valuation domain that generalizes several few-valued domains as well as weakly lexicographic valuations. For each agent, the lower-valued goods, after a positive rescaling, may take values in $\{0,1,d,d+1\}$, $\{0,1,2,2e\}$, or $\{0,1,2,3,4\}$, where $d,e\ge 2$ are integers. Above these goods, the valuation may contain arbitrarily many value classes, subject to the condition that a single good in each class is worth at least the total value of all strictly lower-valued goods. The value classes, scaling factors, and parameters may vary across agents. We give an algorithm that computes an MMS allocation in $O(nm\log^2(2+m))$ time, where $n$ is the number of agents and $m$ is the number of goods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicholas Teh. 2026-09-12. Maximin Share Allocations Beyond Weakly Lexicographic Valuations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00159

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Project Submission Games in Participatory Budgeting

We introduce the framework of project submission games, capturing the behavior of project proposers in participatory budgeting (and multiwinner elections). Here, each proposer submits a subset of project proposals, aiming at maximizing the total cost of those that get funded. We focus on finding conditions under which pure Nash equilibria (NE) exist in our games, and on the complexity of checking whether they exist. We also seek algorithms for computing best responses for the proposers

cs.GT↗

Domination-Avoiding Learning Agents Cannot Collude

An influential paper of Calvano et al. empirically demonstrated that Q-learning agents spontaneously collude when placed as sellers that compete on prices in a natural market model. More recent results of Fish et al. empirically demonstrated that similar collusion happens with commercial LLMs. We formally prove that such collusion can also happen with external-regret-minimizing agents. We identify a very general class of agents, which we term Domination-Avoiding agents, that provably do not collude in such markets. This class contains all Mean-Based agents and all internal-regret-minimizing agents, as well as others such as Multiplicative-Weight agents with variable learning rate and contextual variants thereof. More generally we show that, in any game, this class of agents is guaranteed to jointly learn to almost never play strategies that are eliminated by repeated elimination of purely dominated strategies.

cs.GT↗

Settling the Complexity of Hylland--Zeckhauser Equilibria

The Hylland--Zeckhauser (HZ) mechanism is a foundational framework for allocating indivisible goods in one-sided matching markets via lotteries supported by competitive prices and equal artificial budgets. We resolve the exact computational complexity of the HZ scheme by proving that computing an exact HZ equilibrium is FIXP-complete, thereby settling a conjecture of Vazirani and Yannakakis. Notably, this hardness persists even when computing the equilibrium allocation alone. We establish our hardness result via a reduction that encodes quadratic fixed-point equations into a reciprocal variational inequality. On the algorithmic side, we present a deterministic polynomial-time approximation algorithm that achieves an additive error of $0.0755211 + δ$ for any $δ> 0$, significantly improving upon the previous $1/e$ guarantee.

cs.GT↗