arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.00056

Agentic AI for Staged Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Tunnel Modelling

Abstract

Three-dimensional finite-element (FE) analysis gives the most complete picture of tunnelling-induced ground movement, but it is slow: an engineer must drive the PLAXIS 3D interface through project set-up, stratigraphy, materials, structural elements, meshing and staged calculation. This paper presents a pipeline in which a large language model (LLM) drives PLAXIS 3D through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), with no human operating the interface. A purpose-built MCP server exposes the official remote-scripting API as 19 typed tools. Four agents share the work: orchestrator, geometry, calculation and verification. They draw on 15 inspectable domain-knowledge skill modules and a provenance-tagged intake stage. The verification agent is information-barriered, auditing every model against the raw specification at a pre-mesh checkpoint and again as a calculation gate. It was evaluated on 12 single-tunnel problems in Bangkok subsoil across four capability tiers, using a 15-arm ablation matrix; 13 automated arms and a manual expert baseline were executed, one run per cell. The full system built 12 of 12 models at a mean of 6.1 min with a clean audit on every one; the same models took 24.6 min by hand. Domain skills were decisive: with the complete architecture but all 15 modules withheld, no model was produced. Base-model capability acted as a threshold rather than a gradient. Fable 5, Opus 5 and Sonnet 5 each built 12 of 12, while Haiku 4.5 halted on all 12. Among models that built, agreement was exact: 107 of 111 comparable cells reproduced the reference mesh to the element, and 83 of 86 solved cells agreed with the hand-built expert model within 1.01 % in maximum settlement and 1.21 % in trough-width parameter. Every exception traced to a value misread at intake. The reliability problem in agentic FE automation therefore lies in specification reading, not in code generation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ochok Duangsano, Kuo-Chieh Chao, Sompote Youwai, Nattavich Sittiamornporn, Chana Phutthananon, Pornkasem Jongpradist. 2026-09-04. Agentic AI for Staged Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Tunnel Modelling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00056

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

BioXArena: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Multi-Modal Biomedical Machine Learning Tasks

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate machine-learning model building, yet biomedical benchmarks emphasize question answering, reasoning, and tool use or cover narrow slices of biomedical ML coding. We introduce BioXArena, a biomedical machine learning (BioML) coding benchmark for task-specific model building on heterogeneous, often multi-modal datasets. It contains 76 end-to-end tasks across 9 domains: sequence, single-cell, structure, network biology, chemical biology, perturbation dynamics, phenotype--disease, imaging, and text-integrated tasks. Each task packages primary-source data with hidden labels, held-out graders, and biology-aware metrics on a unified 0-to-100 scale; agents write runnable code, train models, and predict private test samples. BioXArena emphasizes realistic data interfaces: most tasks require agents to integrate multiple input sources, including 46 tasks that combine distinct modality families. We compare 18 harness--backbone configurations: general-purpose coding, biomedical, and ML agents plus our Minimal runner, all under the same controlled resource configuration. Codex with GPT-6 Astra achieves the highest task-level average score of 73.91 among 18 configurations, closely followed by Claude Code with Opus 5.5 (73.79). Matched-backbone comparisons show higher observed scores for mature coding systems than for Minimal; seven Minimal backends characterize model differences under a fixed runner. Beyond the main leaderboard, ablations, robustness checks, and scaling, runtime, and failure-mode analyses characterize how backbones, scaffolds, budgets, and domains affect BioML coding performance, exposing modeling and execution gaps across agent and LLM backbone families.

cs.CE↗

Stochastic Latent Twins: Learning Stochastic Solution Operators

Scientific prediction under uncertainty requires more than a single future state: it requires the distribution of possible outcomes. We show that this distribution-valued evolution can be learned directly as a stochastic solution operator between arbitrary source and target times. We introduce Stochastic Latent Twins, which represent the physical state through a deterministic encoder-decoder while placing stochasticity entirely in a probability-valued latent evolution map. This separation makes the stochastic transition law independent of the state representation and enables direct probabilistic prediction without recursive time stepping. We establish an end-to-end Wasserstein approximation theory that separates representation and latent-transition errors, derive stability guarantees, and develop a distributional theory of physics conformity with latent-to-physical transfer bounds and conformity by construction. The resulting framework can be learned directly from observed transitions and supports forward prediction, backward conditional evolution, one-shot generation, and physics-conforming stochastic dynamics within the same formulation. Numerical experiments ranging from linear and non-Gaussian SDEs to stochastic Lorenz dynamics, generative modeling, a stochastic Hamiltonian system, and a two-dimensional stochastic Burgers equation verify the theory, expose the distinct roles of state representation and transition-family expressivity, compare favorably with recent stochastic and one-step generative methods, and demonstrate exact physical conservation by construction. More broadly, Stochastic Latent Twins provide a step toward scientific surrogates that represent not only the evolution of a system, but also its uncertainty and physical structure, opening new opportunities across uncertainty quantification, data assimilation, inverse problems, control, and digital twins.

cs.CE↗

Product Costing in Data Pipelines

Large data-intensive enterprises spend millions of dollars monthly running data pipelines. Apportioning this cost back to individual products, known as product costing, is a prerequisite for data pricing and cost recovery. However, this process is fundamentally more challenging than physical manufacturing costing due to the unique characteristics of data pipelines, including the non-rivalrous nature of data that complicates the costing formulation, the prevalence of cyclic dependencies that distort the accuracy of results, and the massive scale of pipelines that leads to computational intractability. In this paper, for the first time, we formalize the problem of product costing in data pipelines as a manufacturing cost of data products (MCDP) problem to overcome the non-rivalrous nature of data. To solve MCDP, we propose CostApp, a hybrid algorithm that achieves both exactness and scalability, even for cyclic and massive-scale pipelines. CostApp performs a dimensionality reduction by isolating cyclic dependencies via a feedback arc set (FAS). It aggregates costs onto a compact set of key vertices using a scalable iterative approach, transforming the intractable computational problem into a reduced linear system that can be solved exactly and efficiently by a basic matrix-based method. Experiments on both real-world data and synthetic data show that CostApp scales to process a production pipeline with over 28 million entities within an hour while preserving exactness, supporting pipelines up to 10^2 larger than the direct matrix-based baseline.

cs.CE↗