arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.00005

A Multi-Venue Solana/DeFi Microstructure Data Corpus: The RED-2400 Family v2

Arati Uday Kamat
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Empirical research on decentralized and Solana-native market microstructure is constrained less by method than by data: the strongest results in the field rest on a small number of Ethereum-centric datasets, and public, record-level tapes of Solana venues, cross-chain flows, and on-chain oracle behavior remain scarce. We release and document the RED-2400 family v2, a corpus of five public benchmark datasets assembled by a single public-blockchain observer over a concurrent 57-day 2026 window (2026-05-08 to 2026-07-05) under one methodology (free-tier and public feeds only, no paid data, no private accounts, no trading), each with fixed-seed reproducibility scripts, SHA-256 manifests, and a CC-BY-4.0 licence. The five datasets characterize, respectively, Pyth oracle staleness against centralized-exchange prices (164,002 observations), an Aave utilization and Ethereum liquidation panel (18,750 liquidations plus a four-chain utilization series), spot-perpetual basis and funding coupling (244,719 observations), a Solana CEX-versus-DEX spread tape with realized impact (328,186 observations), and a Wormhole cross-chain source-flow tape (360,714 messages). Across the corpus we report three descriptive findings, one honest null, and one field-completeness characterization; none is presented as a causal estimate. The contribution is a coherent, reproducible benchmark family that complements the Ethereum canon and lowers the data barrier for Solana and cross-chain microstructure research.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.TRq-fin.CPq-fin.ST

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arati Uday Kamat. 2026-07-09. A Multi-Venue Solana/DeFi Microstructure Data Corpus: The RED-2400 Family v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

NEST: Stale-Robust Tokenized-Stock Measurement for a Crypto-Treasury LETF Stack

Tokenized equities trade while listed markets are closed, so their marks could improve off-hours measurement along layered exposures that link Bitcoin, crypto-treasury stocks, and leveraged ETFs. A token return and the next opening gap, however, share the price move from the previous close to the token mark, so part of their apparent fit is mechanical. We develop NEST, a stale-robust protocol that separates this shared-history fit from conditional measurement value. A shared-history identity and a variance-clock bound show how much fit timing alone can generate. The partial determination index (PDI), the squared partial correlation between token and gap given public controls, measures what remains, and a finite-sample frontier expresses the partial-F decision in PDI units. Product, provenance, timestamp, and execution audits decide whether an informative mark is admissible. For MSTRx, a tracker certificate on MicroStrategy (MSTR), a token-only $R^2$ of 0.916 shrinks to a modest increment once Bitcoin, mark age, and a pre-09:00 MSTR premarket proxy are controlled: the token explains 15.7% of the remaining gap variation (1% frontier 0.031), and 14.0% to 17.0% under stricter clock variants, including one in which every token mark precedes 09:00. A trade-level reconstruction on Gate gives 25.2%; NVDAX and AAPLX clear their frontiers, whereas TSLAX does not. An admitted mark updates, rather than replaces, BTC-unit exposure diagnostics for the BTC-MSTR-LETF chain.

q-fin.TR↗
arXiv2026

How Much Screening Buys a Second? Speed, Selection, and the Maker's Spread

We study the spread a liquidity provider needs to break even against counterparties that can exploit a stale quote, and we place two defenses on a single scale: repricing sooner and screening informed flow. A break-even condition pins down the exact screening rate at which a slower maker matches a faster unscreened venue: the selection that buys back the extra staleness. The result requires only an integrable price innovation and therefore holds under jumps, atoms, and infinite variance. Predictable drift is a centering problem: it widens a spot-centered quote, but its cost vanishes once the quote is recentered on the expected reference. In four USDC-WETH pools benchmarked against Binance ETH-USDT from June to August 2026, the one-second benchmark innovation is sharply non-Gaussian: 73% of seconds show no price change. Cutting cadence from twelve seconds to one sheds 84.5% of the expected shock, so a twelve-second maker must screen at least 84.5% of informed flow to match a one-second venue, far above the 71.1% that a Gaussian model implies. In trending markets, the stale pool is picked off at execution: with-trend fills obtain an effective spread 11.1 bps lower than against-trend fills, with the same sign in all four pools.

q-fin.TR↗
arXiv2026

Pricing the Unprovable: Ambiguity, Turnstile Runs, and the Verifiability Discount in Crypto Protocols

Privacy-preserving protocols can repair a vulnerability without establishing whether it was exploited beforehand, even when no theft is reported and aggregate supply is protected. We call the potential value reduction from this gap the verifiability discount. A turnstile model shows how early withdrawal can shift a possible shortfall to remaining holders and why credible evidence can become more valuable as exposure grows. We introduce VDISC, a reproducible framework that records reported loss, exposed value, public evidence, returns, and pool flows separately. It combines Orchard's staged disclosures with reconstructed on-chain flows, earlier Zcash cases, and a 40-event security panel. Orchard follows the predicted direction: market responses were muted after repair and supply assurance, while the largest negative return and aggregate shielded-pool net outflow aligned with the acknowledgment that past abuse could not be ruled out. These patterns are directional, not causal. Across events, market-cap-normalized reported loss and unresolved exposure overlap among the 38 events with a public loss figure (Pearson 0.86, Spearman 0.56), partly because exposure is often coded from the loss itself, so returns alone cannot distinguish reported loss from unresolved history. The findings motivate three candidate design priorities: produce privacy-compatible evidence about past states, limit the state exposed by a single flaw, and disclose residual uncertainty explicitly.

q-fin.TR↗