arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.39851

EPR Count for Runtime Prediction in Distributed Quantum Computing

Abstract

EPR-pair consumption is commonly used as a communication-cost objective in distributed quantum computing, but minimizing EPR cost does not necessarily minimize distributed execution time. Despite its widespread use, the reliability of EPR count as a runtime surrogate has received limited direct characterization across different workloads and communication conditions. This work addresses this gap by systematically evaluating the relationship between EPR cost and runtime over all balanced two-QPU mappings of QFT, QAOA, and CDKM circuits. The results show that mappings with identical EPR cost can have substantially different execution times, lower-EPR mappings can be slower, and minimum-EPR mappings can be runtime-suboptimal. The reliability of EPR count is strongly workload dependent and also changes with the communication operating regime: increasing EPR-generation latency amplifies runtime differences hidden by equal EPR cost, while increased communication concurrency can reduce the ability of EPR count to preserve runtime ordering. These results show that EPR count and execution time are related but distinct optimization objectives, and identify regimes in which explicit communication-aware runtime modeling is necessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fatih E. Bilgen, Ozgur B. Akan. 2026-09-30. EPR Count for Runtime Prediction in Distributed Quantum Computing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39851

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Konflux: Optimized Function Fusion for Serverless Applications

Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) has become a central paradigm in serverless cloud computing, yet optimizing FaaS deployments remains challenging. Using function fusion, multiple functions can be combined into a single deployment unit, which can be used to reduce cost and latency of complex serverless applications comprising multiple functions. Even in small-scale applications, the number of possible fusion configurations is vast, making brute-force benchmarking in production both cost- and time-prohibitive. In this paper, we present a system that can analyze every possible fusion setup of complex applications. By emulating the FaaS platform, our system enables local experimentation, eliminating the need to reconfigure the live platform and significantly reducing associated cost and time. We evaluate all fusion configurations across a number of example FaaS applications and resource limits. Our results reveal that, when analyzing cost and latency trade-offs, only a limited set of fusion configurations represent optimal solutions, which are strongly influenced by the specific pricing model in use.

cs.DC↗

A Self-Defining Operator for Distributed Applications

To operate distributed applications with high availability, operators must rapidly diagnose and mitigate any incident. LLM-based agents can help, but unlike experienced human operators they do not improve as they handle more incidents. Each investigation starts from scratch, re-deriving likely causes and re-testing hypotheses even when a similar fault was resolved in the past. We present a self-defining operator (SDO) that improves with time by updating its operational behavior and memory. When SDO resolves an incident, it distills that experience into playbooks, which describe reusable diagnostic instructions for future incidents with similar faults, and detectors, scripts that take application telemetry as input and output relevant playbook(s). SDO continuously runs the detectors and invokes LLMs only when one fires, so its token cost scales with incident count rather than with operational time. Across 11 open-source microservice applications, SDO cuts resolution time by 52% on recurring faults while keeping per-incident cost low. SDO is open source at https://github.com/self-defining-systems/sdo.

cs.DC↗

Native Dual Pools or Shared Paging? Memory Organization for Concurrent Hybrid LLM Serving

Hybrid attention-SSM serving combines growing attention KV with fixed-size recurrent and convolution state whose allocation units, reuse boundaries, and lifetimes differ. We implement four memory organizations in a modified vLLM runtime: a coarse shared-page baseline (S0), checkpoint-internal recurrent paging (S1), paging with convolution-slot packing (S2), and native dual pools (D0). Nine evaluation questions cover storage costs and serving behavior. The cumulative S0-S1-S2 refinement improves completed-output throughput and tail completion time at the main operating point. D0-S2 performance varies with memory budget, offered load, and admission headroom. Shared-prefix workloads yield larger stepwise gains; gains also persist in a no-sharing control with equal recorded input-work totals. State traces identify recurrent-checkpoint availability as the limit on joint reuse in the tested S2 runs. Extending producer-side checkpoint lifetime increases reusable depth at a fixed page budget. A fresh-seed SHARE/ISOLATE comparison estimates a positive retention interaction, with a primary confidence interval that includes zero. Retained-state continuation correctness remains unresolved. These findings motivate evaluating physical state representation together with request admission and checkpoint lifetime when designing memory management for concurrent hybrid-model serving.

cs.DC↗