arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.38468

Migration and Evolution of giant ExoPlanets (MEEP). III. Twenty-Nine Giant Planets from the TESS Mission

Jack Schulte·Joseph E. Rodriguez·David W. Latham·Allyson Bieryla·Karen A. Collins·Samuel N. Quinn·Xian-Yu Wang·Rafael Brahm·Abdullah Al-Haji·Robert Aloisi·Caitlyn Altermatt·Nikola Antonov·David Baker·Pavel Balanutsa·Khalid Barkaoui·Özgür Baştürk·Slawomir Bednarz·Paul Benni·Krzysztof Bernacki·Mario Billiani·Ventsislav Bodakov·Pau Bosch-Cabot·Valerio Bozza·Ahmet Cem Kutluay·David R. Ciardi·Catherine A. Clark·Jerome de Leon·Jason D. Eastman·İpek Aleyna Ertürk·Thomas M. Esposito·Phil Evans·Miranda Felsmann·Raquel Forés-Toribio·Isaac Fournier·Akihiko Fukui·Tianjun Gan·Cristilyn Gardner-Watkins·Purvi Garg·Eric Girardin·Tateki Goto·Ferran Grau Horta·Thomas Henning·Eric G. Hintz·Keith Horne·Kai Ikuta·Jon M. Jenkins·Andrés Jordán·Jenson Keen·Adam Kraus·Valentina Kuzmina·Artem Kuznetsov·Adam Lark·Rodrigo Leiva·Vladimir Lipunov·Michael B. Lund·Franck Marchis·Joshua Margherone·Robert Massey·Kim McLeod·Edward Michaels·Mayuko Mori·J. A. Muñoz·Felipe Murgas·Norio Narita·Takaya Okada·Shane Painter·Enric Palle·Ivan Panchenko·Hannu Parviainen·Anastasiia Pechko·Adam Popowicz·Don Radford·Fabian Rodriguez Frustaglia·Sylvain Roux·Subhroja Roy·Matthew Ryno·Gülben Şancı·Richard P. Schwarz·Victor Senik·Lauren A. Sgro·Avi Shporer·Gregor Srdoc·Denise Stephens·Chris Stockdale·Ashley Stone·Ivan Strakhov·Marcelo Tala Pinto·Thiam-Guan Tan·Suzanne Taylor·Neil Thomas·Nataly Tiurina·Julian C. van Eyken·Songhu Wang·Noriharu Watanabe·Levi R. Webb·Francis P. Wilkin·Joe Williams·Selçuk Yalçınkaya·Mesut Yılmaz·Carl Ziegler

Abstract

We present the discovery and characterization of 29 hot and warm Jupiter systems transiting bright ($G < 12.8$) FGK stars using TESS data and ground-based photometry and spectroscopy. Through the use of high angular resolution imaging, we discovered three bound stellar companions, named TOI-3988 B, TOI-6171 B, and TOI-7266 B. The planets that we confirmed span an orbital period range of $1.28 - 16.9$ days, a mass range of $0.35 - 8.7$ $\mathrm{M}_{\mathrm{J}}$, and an orbital eccentricity range of $0 - 0.6$, and add to the growing self-consistent sample of hot and warm Jupiter systems detected using TESS and analyzed using the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo code EXOFASTv2. By performing two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests on a set of host star and planetary parameters, we find that this growing self-consistent sample of giant planets has a different distribution of host star masses, surface gravities, and metallicities, compared to the hot Jupiter and warm Jupiter systems in the literature, likely due to the additional constraint on the host star density from the planetary transits included in our global fits. We find that seven of the 29 newly confirmed planets have significant orbital eccentricity, and that one of these, TOI-3365 b, is in a system which likely hosts a massive outer companion. The continued confirmation of hot Jupiter and warm Jupiter systems and the follow-up RV monitoring on these systems to identify outer companions will pave the way for important investigations of giant planet migration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jack Schulte, Joseph E. Rodriguez, David W. Latham, Allyson Bieryla, Karen A. Collins, Samuel N. Quinn, Xian-Yu Wang, Rafael Brahm, Abdullah Al-Haji, Robert Aloisi, Caitlyn Altermatt, Nikola Antonov, David Baker, Pavel Balanutsa, Khalid Barkaoui, Özgür Baştürk, Slawomir Bednarz, Paul Benni, Krzysztof Bernacki, Mario Billiani, Ventsislav Bodakov, Pau Bosch-Cabot, Valerio Bozza, Ahmet Cem Kutluay, David R. Ciardi, Catherine A. Clark, Jerome de Leon, Jason D. Eastman, İpek Aleyna Ertürk, Thomas M. Esposito, Phil Evans, Miranda Felsmann, Raquel Forés-Toribio, Isaac Fournier, Akihiko Fukui, Tianjun Gan, Cristilyn Gardner-Watkins, Purvi Garg, Eric Girardin, Tateki Goto, Ferran Grau Horta, Thomas Henning, Eric G. Hintz, Keith Horne, Kai Ikuta, Jon M. Jenkins, Andrés Jordán, Jenson Keen, Adam Kraus, Valentina Kuzmina, Artem Kuznetsov, Adam Lark, Rodrigo Leiva, Vladimir Lipunov, Michael B. Lund, Franck Marchis, Joshua Margherone, Robert Massey, Kim McLeod, Edward Michaels, Mayuko Mori, J. A. Muñoz, Felipe Murgas, Norio Narita, Takaya Okada, Shane Painter, Enric Palle, Ivan Panchenko, Hannu Parviainen, Anastasiia Pechko, Adam Popowicz, Don Radford, Fabian Rodriguez Frustaglia, Sylvain Roux, Subhroja Roy, Matthew Ryno, Gülben Şancı, Richard P. Schwarz, Victor Senik, Lauren A. Sgro, Avi Shporer, Gregor Srdoc, Denise Stephens, Chris Stockdale, Ashley Stone, Ivan Strakhov, Marcelo Tala Pinto, Thiam-Guan Tan, Suzanne Taylor, Neil Thomas, Nataly Tiurina, Julian C. van Eyken, Songhu Wang, Noriharu Watanabe, Levi R. Webb, Francis P. Wilkin, Joe Williams, Selçuk Yalçınkaya, Mesut Yılmaz, Carl Ziegler. 2026-09-29. Migration and Evolution of giant ExoPlanets (MEEP). III. Twenty-Nine Giant Planets from the TESS Mission. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38468

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Two Low-Mass-Ratio Microlensing Planets from High-Magnification Events: KMT-2021-BLG-0247 and MOA-2023-BLG-169

We present an analysis of two planetary microlensing events, KMT-2021-BLG-0247 and MOA-2023-BLG-169, both of which exhibit high magnifications and low planet--host mass ratios, but with markedly different levels of parameter constraint. For KMT-2021-BLG-0247, the finite-source effect and microlens parallax are both clearly detected, leading to unusually tight constraints on the physical properties of the lens system. The host mass and lens distance are approximately $M_{\rm L}=0.9\pm0.1\,M_\odot$ and $D_{\rm L}=6.7^{+1.0}_{-0.3}\,\mathrm{kpc}$, respectively, and the planet mass is $M_{\rm p}=41\pm5\,M_\oplus$. The projected planet--host separations are $a_\perp=3.4^{+0.7}_{-0.3}\,\mathrm{au}$ and $3.0^{+0.6}_{-0.3}\,\mathrm{au}$ for the wide and close solutions, respectively. In contrast, MOA-2023-BLG-169 involves an extremely faint source, with $I_{S,{\rm OGLE}}=26.73$, such that the light curve permits a broad family of strongly correlated solutions. We therefore construct the physical-parameter likelihood using approximate invariant combinations of the light-curve parameters and supplement it with post-event Euclid/VIS imaging from the Euclid Q2 Galactic Bulge Survey (Beaulieu et al. 2026). The Euclid data reveal a component at the event position with ${\rm VIS}_{\rm AB}=23.05\pm0.09\,{\rm mag}$. Interpreting this component as the combined light from the source and any luminous lens, the resulting posterior gives $M_{\rm L}=0.48^{+0.23}_{-0.17}\,M_\odot$, $D_{\rm L}=3.50^{+2.82}_{-1.20}\,\mathrm{kpc}$, $a_\perp=1.62^{+0.77}_{-0.43}\,\mathrm{au}$, and $M_{\rm p}=143^{+103}_{-63}\,M_\oplus$. MOA-2023-BLG-169 demonstrates that, for an extreme faint-source event, even the event timescale and angular Einstein radius can remain strongly dependent on the Galactic prior and independent flux constraints.

astro-ph.EP↗

Gravitational Microlensing

Gravitational microlensing is a unique planet-detection method that does not rely on detecting light from the host star or planet. Instead, planets are discovered when their gravitational field perturbs the light coming from a distant source. The mechanics of this method offer several advantages. It has the ability to detect wide-orbit planets of various masses around host stars of different types, at and beyond the system's snow line. Thus, microlensing complements the other detecting techniques that are more sensitive to close-orbit or high-mass planets. In this Chapter, we review the microlensing method and discuss how the physical properties, such as mass and distance, can be extracted from the microlensing light curve or from additional high-angular resolution observations. Microlensing is essential for the broader context of exoplanet demographics, as it can place constraints on planets, in wide orbits, beyond the {\it snow line}. Studying this parameter space can help us unravel the details of planet formation and how our own Solar System formed. Lastly, we provide an example of how to model a light curve and obtain accurate physical parameters for the host and planet.

astro-ph.EP↗

Size, Shape, and Geometric Albedo of Dwarf Planet Quaoar's Largest Satellite Weywot

The small satellites of dwarf-planet size worlds in trans-Neptunian space are thought to be produced through giant impacts, and are typically observed to have bright water-ice-dominated surfaces. Here we focus on Quaoar's small primary satellite, Weywot. We build on previous work by re-analyzing the June 2023 stellar occultation by Weywot using results from 11 orbits of HST imaging with the Wide Field Camera 3. Weywot's rotational lightcurve was constrained along with its independent photometric phase curve, which we used to obtain more robust measurements of Weywot's size, shape, and geometric albedo. We found Weywot's volume-equivalent radius to be req = 73+-5 km, with principal axes a = 82+5-3 , b = 73+5-3, c = 65+8-12 km, indicating a triaxial shape. This shape is consistent with a Roche-ellipsoid rubble-pile interpretation requiring only moderate internal friction at Weywot's current semimajor axis, and Weywot can retain this shape down to Quaoar's co-rotation radius. We also found Weywot's geometric albedo to be quite low, pV = 0.036+0.010-0.006, akin to that of Eris's satellite Dysnomia, but over an order of magnitude lower than Pluto's minor satellites and Haumea's satellites. We propose this may indicate that Weywot's ice-mass fraction < 100%, and that Weywot is not sourced from the water-ice mantle of a differentiated pre-impact progenitor as suggested for Pluto's minor satellites and Haumea's satellites.

astro-ph.EP↗