arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.38410

The weak maximizing property is not inherited by subspaces of the domain

Alessandro Costa·Vinícius Miranda·Geivison Ribeiro
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We construct a separable reflexive Banach lattice $X$ and a closed sublattice $E\subseteq X$ such that every bounded linear operator from $X$ into $\ell_2$ is compact, whereas there exists a positive operator from $E$ into $\ell_2$ that does not attain its norm and admits a positive maximizing sequence converging weakly to a nonzero vector. This answers negatively the question posed by Dantas, Jung and Martínez-Cervantes in [4] concerning the inheritance of the weak maximizing property by closed subspaces of the domain. It also answers negatively the corresponding question for the positive weak maximizing property and closed sublattices of reflexive Banach lattices. Canonical lattice complexification yields a counterexample to the original question over the complex field as well.

Explore related subjects

math.FA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alessandro Costa, Vinícius Miranda, Geivison Ribeiro. 2026-09-29. The weak maximizing property is not inherited by subspaces of the domain. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

An Exposition on Weak Stability of Operators

This is an expository survey on weak stability of bounded linear operators acting on normed spaces in general and, in particular, on Hilbert spaces. The paper gives a comprehensive account of the problem of weak operator stability, containing a few new results and some unanswered questions. It also gives an updated review of the literature on the weak stability of operators over the past sixty years, including present-day research trends. It is verified that the majority of the weak stability literature is concentrated on Hilbert-space operators. We discuss why this preference occurs and also why the weak stability of unitary operators is central to the Hilbert-space stability problem.

math.FA↗
arXiv2026

Embeddings of variable Sobolev, Besov, and Triebel-Lizorkin spaces on metric measure spaces

Sobolev-type embeddings on metric measure spaces encode a subtle interaction between the analytic regularity of functions and the geometry of the underlying domain space. In this paper we develop an embedding theory for variable Hajłasz-type smoothness spaces on metric measure spaces whose ``dimension'' is allowed to vary pointwise through a bounded exponent $Q(\cdot)$ that governs a lower Ahlfors growth condition on the measure. We introduce variable exponent Hajłasz-Sobolev spaces $M^{s(\cdot),p(\cdot)}$, Hajłasz-Triebel-Lizorkin spaces $M^{s(\cdot)}_{p(\cdot),q(\cdot)}$, and Hajłasz-Besov spaces $N^{s(\cdot)}_{p(\cdot),q(\cdot)}$, and establish Sobolev, Morrey, and Moser-Trudinger type embeddings into variable exponent Lebesgue and Hölder spaces. These embeddings are proved both locally (on balls) under a lower Ahlfors $Q(\cdot)$-regularity condition on the measure and regularity assumptions on the exponents (notably log-Hölder continuity), and globally under additional geometric hypotheses such as geometric doubling and mild uniform bounds on the measure of unit balls. We also identify geometric conditions that are not only sufficient but, in appropriate forms, necessary for the validity of these embeddings, showing in particular that such inequalities force a lower growth bound on the measure of order $r^{Q(x)}$.

math.FA↗
arXiv2026

A Constructive Framework for Generalized Fourier Transforms via Truncate-and-Generalized Limits

This paper introduces a constructive definition of generalized Fourier transforms based entirely on ordinary truncated Fourier integrals and ordered dual-domain limits, within the framework of improper Riemann integration and classical analysis. The proposed truncate-and-generalized-limit (t.g.l.) formulation does not require test-function spaces, Lebesgue measure theory, or duality pairings in its proofs: the forward and inverse transforms are defined directly through finite-domain truncation of the target function, followed by successive ordered limits in the time and frequency domains. As consequences of this constructive definition, the formulation provides a unified treatment of non-decaying, oscillatory, and locally singular functions beyond the classical L1(R) setting; reveals an inherent asymmetry between the forward transform, interpreted as a first-order generalized-limit family, and the inverse transform, which requires frequency-domain truncation to generate pointwise reconstruction through Dirichlet-type oscillatory localisation; and clarifies the distinction between the t.g.l. approach and distribution theory, where generalized Fourier transforms are introduced through duality pairings rather than constructed from ordinary integrals. The inversion formula is established rigorously for two concrete admissible classes using only the classical Dirichlet convergence theorem. Several examples confirm that the framework covers constants, polynomials, periodic functions, singular kernels, and chirp signals within a single constructive scheme.

math.FA↗