arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.37882

How Many Labels Does a Language Need? Annotation Budgets and Cross-Lingual Pooling for African-Language Text Classification

Bhanu Prakash Vangala·Sowmya Guda·Navya Vangala
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Every text classifier for an African language begins with a budgeting question: how many labelled examples are needed, and can labels from other African languages stand in for them? We answer both questions empirically for 28 language-task pairs, news topic classification in 16 languages (MasakhaNEWS) and tweet sentiment in 12 languages (AfriSenti), using a character n-gram linear model that trains in seconds on two CPU cores with no pretrained weights and no accelerator. Monolingual learning curves at budgets from 25 to several thousand labels show that topic classification reaches 90\% of its full-data macro-F1 with about 400 labels in the median language, while sentiment is still improving at the full training size in 11 of 12 languages and needs thousands of labels. Pooling the full training data of the other languages in the benchmark is worth a great deal at small budgets and nothing at large ones: at 25 target labels it adds 0.20 macro-F1 on average for news (up to 0.43 for Lingala) and 0.08 for sentiment, the gain decays to zero by 800 labels, and at full size pooling hurts in 9 of 16 and 8 of 12 languages. Twenty-five target labels plus pooled data match what 100 to 400 monolingual labels achieve for most news languages. A complete zero-shot transfer matrix shows that transfer without any target labels recovers a median of only 13\% (news) and 4\% (sentiment) of the gap between a majority-class predictor and the in-language model, with the exceptions explained by shared script (Amharic and Tigrinya), shared lexicon (English and Nigerian Pidgin, the Arabic dialects), or a shared label prior rather than by language family. We release code that regenerates every number from the public benchmark files and translate the results into concrete annotation guidance for teams building African-language classifiers without GPUs.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bhanu Prakash Vangala, Sowmya Guda, Navya Vangala. 2026-09-29. How Many Labels Does a Language Need? Annotation Budgets and Cross-Lingual Pooling for African-Language Text Classification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37882

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

NMIXX: Domain-Adapted Neural Embeddings for Cross-Lingual eXploration of Finance

Financial text embeddings must distinguish changes in event status, perspective, and obligations even when passages share similar wording. NMIXX adapts existing encoders through 18.8k source-linked triplets: paraphrases and Korean-English translations preserve meaning, while targeted financial rewrites introduce semantic contrasts. We examine this recipe across seven backbones on English and Korean financial and general-domain semantic textual similarity (STS), and analyze the composition and passage lengths of KorFinSTS. BGE-M3 attains the highest adapted financial correlations in this comparison, improving from 0.1969 to 0.2967 on FinSTS and from 0.0512 to 0.2732 on KorFinSTS. Its general English and Korean correlations decrease by 0.0391 and 0.0463. Across the seven models, five improve their mean financial correlation, but all reduce their mean general-domain correlation. Per-language comparisons and benchmark-weight sensitivity analysis reveal differences obscured by a single aggregate score. The study contributes a finance-specific supervision design and evidence for evaluating adaptation jointly with retained general semantic capability; direct cross-language retrieval remains outside its evaluation scope.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Sequential Bayesian Evaluation of Large Language Model Behavior

It is increasingly important to evaluate the characteristics of systems based on large language models (LLMs). Evaluations in this context often rely on a curated benchmark set of input prompts provided to the LLM, where the output for each prompt may be assigned a binary or ordinal score and the aggregation of scores across prompts is then used as a summary evaluation. In this paper, we develop a Bayesian approach for quantifying the uncertainty that arises in such evaluation metrics as a result of the stochasticity of the LLM-based systems; the same prompt may exhibit different outcomes on repeated runs. Our framework leads naturally to a sequential evaluation, in which we leverage the Bayesian model to preferentially select which prompts in the benchmark to use next, enabling more cost-effective LLM evaluations. We demonstrate this approach through four case studies: pairwise LLM preferences in interactive dialogue (MT-Bench), refusal rates on adversarial inputs (JailbreakBench), embodied agentic reasoning (ALFWorld), and agentic web-search Q&A (GAIA). Our results illustrate how a Bayesian approach can provide insightful uncertainty quantification about the behavior of blackbox LLM-based systems in a manner that is not accessible via deterministic or single-run evaluations.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

ResidualKV: Residual-Based KV Cache Compression for Efficient Long-Context Inference

Efficient long-context inference faces two coupled bottlenecks: KV-cache memory grows linearly with context length, while attention computation grows quadratically. Existing approaches typically address one at the expense of irreversible token eviction, full-cache retention, or full-history reconstruction, limiting their effectiveness for multi-turn interaction and long-form reasoning. Motivated by two empirical properties, Long-Range Inter-Token Similarity and Smooth Residual Distribution, we propose ResidualKV, which factorizes the KV cache into a sparse set of globally retrieved references and compact, quantized residual codes for the remaining tokens. This representation preserves token-specific information without permanent eviction and, when combined with sparse attention, reconstructs only the selected states on demand. Dynamic-stride scheduling further reduces reference growth from linear to approximately logarithmic at ultra-long contexts. Across Llama, Qwen, LLaVA-OV, and Qwen3-VL backbones, ResidualKV maintains near-full-cache performance using only 13%-16% KV storage and 30% attention computation on LongBench, and 8%-10% storage and 10% computation in matched-budget multimodal evaluation. It also accelerates decoding by up to $1.5\times$ with KV-cache quantization and $3.4\times$ without it. These results show that global cross-token redundancy supports accurate, memory-efficient, and computation-efficient long-context inference. The source code is available at https://github.com/CURRENTF/ResidualKV.

cs.CL↗