arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.37478

Pseudo-Hyperjump Inversion Fails for Turing Degrees

Abstract

Jananthan and Simpson asked in Conjecture~4.5 whether every pseudo-hyperjump $\operatorname{HJ}_e(X)=X\oplus V_e^X$, with $V_e^X$ uniformly $Π^1_1(X)$, admits Turing-degree inversion above Kleene's $\mathcal{O}$. We settle their conjecture in the negative. We construct one index $e_*$ such that $X<_{\mathrm T}\operatorname{HJ}_{e_*}(X)$ for every real $X$, while the range of $\operatorname{HJ}_{e_*}$ omits every Turing degree $\mathbf d$ such that $°_{\mathrm T}(\mathcal{O})\leq\mathbf d<°_{\mathrm T}(\mathcal{O}^{\mathcal{O}})$. Thus Conjecture~4.5 fails even for an operator which strictly raises the Turing degree of every input. Each of Properties~4.6--4.8 implies Conjecture~4.5; consequently, the accompanying class-characterisation problems collapse: no class of reals, even without a definability assumption, satisfies any one of these properties.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Patrizio Cintioli. 2026-09-27. Pseudo-Hyperjump Inversion Fails for Turing Degrees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37478

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Small additive groups with $A+ξA=\mathbb R$

We prove that, for every irrational $ξ$, any $F_σ$ additive subgroup of $\R$ has an $F_σ$ $\Q$-vector space extension of the same Hausdorff dimension satisfying $A+ξA=\R$. Iteration gives simultaneous surjectivity for any prescribed countable family of irrational multipliers. Such a space exists in every prescribed dimension $d\in[0,1)$. We also construct in ZFC a zero-dimensional lightface $Δ^0_3$ $\Q$-vector subspace $A$ for which $A+ξA=\R$ holds for every irrational $ξ$, answering both parts of Question~2 of Ye, Yu, and Zhao. This universal group is a difference of two $F_σ$ sets, but is neither $F_σ$ nor $G_δ$. Both constructions use direct inductions on finite binary strings and admit effective versions. As applications, we obtain zero-dimensional $F_σ$ groups whose Cartesian squares have Hausdorff dimension one, and relate their dilate sums to Marstrand's projection theorem.

math.LO↗

Proof Theory for Non-Contingency Logic

{Non-contingency logic $(\KWL)$ replaces the usual necessity operator of modal logic with an operator expressing that a proposition is necessarily true or necessarily false. Besides its intrinsic logical interest, it admits natural interpretations as knowing whether in epistemic logic and as decidability under the arithmetical interpretation of provability logic. Although the semantics of non-contingency logic have been extensively studied, its proof theory remains comparatively underdeveloped. In this paper, we develop a uniform proof-theoretic framework for $\KWL$ over a broad class of frame conditions. Our approach is based on generalized path conditions (GPCs), a grammar-theoretic formalism that uniformly captures many standard modal frame properties. For every finite set $\gpc$ of GPCs, we construct a corresponding labelled sequent calculus. All calculi share a common set of logical rules and differ only by a single structural rule generated from $\gpc$, which captures the underlying frame conditions. We prove that these calculi are sound and complete with respect to their corresponding frame classes, thereby providing a uniform proof theory for a large family of non-contingency logics.}

math.LO↗

Shelah's Main Gap and the generalized Borel-reducibility

We answer one of the main questions in generalized descriptive set theory, the Friedman-Hyttinen-Kulikov conjecture on the Borel reducibility of the Main Gap. We show a correlation between Shelah's Main Gap and generalized Borel reducibility notions of complexity. For any $κ$ satisfying $κ=λ^+=2^λ$ and $2^{\mathfrak{c}}\leqλ=λ^{ω_1}$, we show that if $T$ is a classifiable theory and $T'$ is a non-classifiable theory, then the isomorphism of models of $T'$ is strictly above the isomorphism of models of $T$ with respect to Borel-reducibility. We also show that the following can be forced: for any countable first-order theory in a countable vocabulary, $T$, the isomorphism of models of $T$ is either analytic co-analytic, or analytically-complete.

math.LO↗