arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.37431

Query Complexity of Testing Structured Parenthesis Languages

Tim Jackman·Diptaksho Palit·Sofya Raskhodnikova
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the query complexity of testing membership in structured string languages, focusing on Dyck languages and natural generalizations. A tester receives query access to a word and must distinguish valid inputs from words that are far in Hamming distance, while inspecting only a sublinear number of positions. Our results sharpen the boundary between constant-query testability and polynomial query complexity. First, we prove an $Ω(n^{2/5})$ lower bound for testing Dyck languages $D_m$ with any fixed number $m\ge2$ of parenthesis types, improving the previous $Ω(n^{1/5})$ lower bound of Fischer, Magniez, and Starikovskaya (SODA `18) and nearly matching their upper bound of $O(n^{2/5+o(1)})$. Furthermore, we show that all nonadaptive algorithms for these problems require $Ω(n^{1/2})$ queries. Our lower bounds use a Pólya-urn process to construct the hard distribution; Second, we identify a broad class of weighted-parenthesis languages, which we call {\em excursion languages,} that remain constant-query testable. These languages encode bounded-step walks that stay nonnegative and return to zero. For every fixed excursion language, we give a nonadaptive tester with query complexity $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$, and we prove this dependence on $\varepsilon$ is optimal, even for adaptive algorithms. As a special case, we obtain the tight $Θ(1/\varepsilon^2)$ query complexity of testing $D_1$, improving the previous $O(\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ upper bound and giving the first matching two-sided-error lower bound. Third, we construct a simple hard language, Hidden String, that is generated by a deterministic linear grammar but nevertheless requires $Ω(n^{2/5})$ adaptive queries and $Ω(n^{1/2})$ nonadaptive queries to test. This shows that polynomial query complexity appears even for highly restricted string languages.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tim Jackman, Diptaksho Palit, Sofya Raskhodnikova. 2026-09-29. Query Complexity of Testing Structured Parenthesis Languages. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37431

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Min-Sum Set Cover on Parallel Machines

We consider a generalization of the Min-Sum Set Cover to the setup with $m$ set-sequences, or in scheduling terminology, $m$ parallel machines. We call this problem Parallel Min-Sum Set Cover. To obtain approximation algorithms for its numerous variants we use a crucial sub-problem called Parallel Densest Subfamily. We prove that an $α$-approximation algorithm for this task gives a $4\cdotα$-approximation for the Parallel Min-Sum Set Cover, which yields $\frac{4\cdot e}{e-1}+ε$ and $4\cdot \frac{e}{e-1}^2+ε$-approximation ratios for identical and unrelated machines, respectively. To obtain the latter result we give a new $\frac{e}{e-1}^2+ε$-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Coverage Multiple Knapsacks problem which is of independent interest. If the sets are precedence-constrained, for unit cost sets we give an $\mathcal{O}(k^{2/3})$ approximation ($k$ is the number of sets). For the case of out-forest precedence constraints we improve this bound to $\mathcal{O}(\log k)$ via a reduction to the Group Steiner Orienteering problem, and show this is tight, unless $NP\subseteq ZTIME(n^{\mathcal{O}(\text{poly}(\log n))})$.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Learning Latent Algebraic Structure from Ambiguous Set Observations

We study when statistically learnable latent structure can also be recovered efficiently, and how membership queries change the answer. An unknown support $A\subseteq\mathbb F_2^n$ has small additive doubling and is observed through a fixed set $B$ satisfying $|A\triangle B|\leη|A|$. We seek one linear subspace $V$ such that every compatible support $A$ is covered by few $V$-cosets and satisfies $|V|\le|A|$. For every $η<1$, polynomially many uniform samples suffice statistically, with cost polynomial in the doubling constant and proportional to $(1-η)^{-1}$; this radius dependence is sharp. Under a specified hardness assumption for learning parities with noise (search-LPN), however, no polynomial-time sample-only learner achieves even constant covering cost, including when the latent support is unique. At fixed structural parameters and the same constant covering budget, adding exact membership queries to $B$ permits polynomial-time recovery. The general query learner constructs a short structural list and uses fresh samples to select one common output through a majority-coverage rule. Persistent structured cores make this candidate construction possible. At doubling one, a complementary distinction appears at $η=1/3$: coarse recovery remains polynomial time, while exact recovery requires exponentially many accesses in the worst case when latent cardinality is unknown.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Testing the Binary Rank with Polynomial Query Complexity

We design an adaptive two-sided error testing algorithm for the binary rank of a $0,1$ matrix $M$ with query complexity $O(d^3\log(d+1)/ε^2)$, where $d$ is the tested binary rank bound and $ε$ is the distance parameter. This answers an open question posed by Parnas, Ron and Shraibman~\cite{parnas2021property}, who asked if the binary rank can be tested with query complexity polynomial in $d$ and $1/ε$. Furthermore, our testing algorithm can be used to find an approximate binary decomposition of $M$ with an additional $d(n+m)$ queries. That is, under the promise that the binary rank of $M$ is at most $d$, we show how to find, with probability at least $5/6$, two $0,1$ matrices $A',B'$ such that $M' = A' \cdot B'$ is a $0,1$ matrix which differs from $M$ on at most an $O(ε)$ fraction of its entries. Our results also imply a testing algorithm with polynomial query complexity for the equivalent problem of testing if the edges of a bipartite graph can be partitioned into at most $d$ bicliques.

cs.DS↗