arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.37278

Matroid Packing Games: The Core and the Nucleolus

Pengfei Liu·Han Xiao·Xin Chen·Qizhi Fang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we study the matroid base packing problem from the perspective of cooperative game theory and define the associated matroid base packing game. This model extends the network strength game of Baiou and Barahona (2020) from graphic matroids to general matroids. Building on the exchange structure of matroid, we develop a graph theoretic framework for analyzing the core and the nucleolus in this game. This framework yields a compact characterization of core nonemptiness and enables polynomial time algorithms for testing core nonemptiness, finding a core allocation, and computing the nucleolus. In particular, the approach provides a broader and more structured framework for the nucleolus computation problem arising in network strength games studied by Baiou and Barahona (2020), covering both the nonempty core and empty core cases.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pengfei Liu, Han Xiao, Xin Chen, Qizhi Fang. 2026-09-29. Matroid Packing Games: The Core and the Nucleolus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37278

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Throttling Equilibria in Auction Markets

Throttling is a popular method of budget management for online ad auctions in which the platform modulates the participation probability of an advertiser in order to smoothly spend her budget across many auctions. In this work, we investigate the setting in which all of the advertisers simultaneously employ throttling to manage their budgets, and we do so for both first-price and second-price auctions. We analyze the structural and computational properties of the resulting equilibria. For first-price auctions, we show that a unique equilibrium always exists, is well-behaved and can be computed efficiently via tatonnement-style decentralized dynamics. In contrast, for second-price auctions, we prove that even though an equilibrium always exists, the problem of finding even an approximate equilibrium is PPAD-complete, there can be multiple equilibria, and it is NP-hard to find the revenue maximizing one. We also compare the equilibrium outcomes of throttling to those of multiplicative pacing, which is the other most popular and well-studied method of budget management. Finally, we characterize the Price of Anarchy of these equilibria for liquid welfare by showing that it is at most 2 for both first-price and second-price auctions, and demonstrating that our bound is tight.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Strategic Disclosure of Action Space in Principal-Agent Contracts

We study strategic disclosure of the action space in principal-agent contracting, where an agent selects a disclosed action set to shape the principal's perception of her capabilities before contract design. Unaware of the strategic disclosure, the principal designs a revenue-optimal contract as if the disclosed action set were complete and accurate. We consider two variants distinguished by cost verifiability. When costs are unverifiable, the agent can extract the entire first-best surplus, leaving the principal with zero revenue. When costs are verifiable, we characterize the agent's optimal disclosure strategy in binary-outcome settings and, more generally, when the principal is restricted to linear contracts, reducing the agent's problem to a two-variable convex optimization problem. We prove that the agent can secure utility of at least a $1/e$ fraction of the first-best surplus, which also yields a $1/e$ welfare guarantee under optimal disclosure. While the principal's revenue can be arbitrarily small compared to the first-best surplus, when the ratio of maximum to minimum expected reward among non-null base actions is at most $L$, we establish a revenue guarantee of $Θ(1/\log L)$ relative to the first-best surplus. We also compare utilities and welfare under strategic disclosure with their counterparts in the canonical model. Finally, we extend the agent's $1/e$ utility guarantee to general outcome spaces without restricting the principal to linear contracts. Our results show how strategic action-space disclosure changes the distribution of surplus while preserving a constant-factor welfare guarantee under the agent's optimal disclosure.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

On the Geographic Incentives of Multiple Concurrent Proposers

We study whether systems with multiple concurrent proposers (MCP) incentivize the geographic decentralization of proposers. In our model, concurrent proposers strategically choose their locations to maximize their captured market share of users, who decide where to send transactions by comparing each proposer's time to inclusion. The time to inclusion between a user and a proposer consists of two terms: the distance between them, and the distance between the proposer and her nearest quorum of attesters, the latter of which we term the quorum radius. We formally prove that proposers' quorum radii are the determinant of their incentives: proposers optimally choose where to locate in order to minimize their quorum radii. We obtain as a result co-location when proposers also serve as attesters, but geographic diversity when these roles are separate. We also examine pre-confirmations and faster intervalidator connections, showing that they attenuate the influence of the quorum radius and further destabilize co-location incentives.

cs.GT↗