Where Does Randomness Matter in Neural Cellular Automata?

Fei Zuo; Jiaqi Shi; Yujing Liu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.36797

Where Does Randomness Matter in Neural Cellular Automata?

Fei Zuo·Jiaqi Shi·Yujing Liu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Stochastic cell updates are often used throughout the life of a neural cellular automaton (NCA), from backpropagation through time to final rollout. This leaves two questions entangled: does update randomness help learn a useful rule, and must that randomness remain at execution? We separate training and evaluation update modes in controlled Growing NCA experiments, then vary the states shown during training. Under the standard constant-rate persist recipe, asynchronous training passes the short-horizon quality test in 10/10 runs, compared with 3/10 synchronous runs. All ten asynchronous models also retain the target for 4,096 steps under deterministic evaluation. For a scalar translation-invariant lattice, we derive an exact mean-square criterion: random masking can damp mean modes, but it also injects variance, and a mean-only test misclassifies four non-marginal settings. Finally, among 30 models that all pass the same reconstruction test, eight of ten grow-trained models become off-target at 4,096 steps, while all persist and regenerate models retain the target; damage recovery separates persist from regenerate. The results distinguish optimization reliability, execution mode, and task-specific behavior instead of treating them as one stability property.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG cs.NE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Fei Zuo, Jiaqi Shi, Yujing Liu. 2026-09-29. Where Does Randomness Matter in Neural Cellular Automata?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36797

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Robust Budget Pacing with a Single Sample

Major Internet advertising platforms offer budget pacing tools as a standard service for advertisers to manage their ad campaigns. Given the inherent non-stationarity in an advertiser's value and also competing advertisers' values over time, a commonly used approach is to learn a target expenditure plan that specifies a target spend as a function of time, and then run a controller that tracks this plan. This raises the question: how many historical samples are required to learn a good expenditure plan? We study this question by considering an advertiser repeatedly participating in $T$ second-price auctions, where the tuple of her value and the highest competing bid is drawn from an unknown time-varying distribution. The advertiser seeks to maximize her total utility subject to her budget constraint. Prior work has shown the sufficiency of $T\log T$ samples per distribution to achieve the optimal $O(\sqrt{T})$-regret. We dramatically improve this state-of-the-art and show that just one sample per distribution is enough to achieve the near-optimal $\tilde O(\sqrt{T})$-regret, while still being robust to noise in the sampling distributions.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Spatio-Temporal Partial Sensing Forecast for Long-term Traffic

Traffic forecasting uses recent measurements by sensors installed at chosen locations to forecast the future road traffic. Existing work either assumes all locations are equipped with sensors or focuses on short-term forecast. This paper studies partial sensing forecast of long-term traffic, assuming sensors are available only at some locations. The problem is challenging due to the unknown data distribution at unsensed locations, the intricate spatio-temporal correlation in long-term forecasting, as well as noise to traffic patterns. We propose a Spatio-temporal Long-term Partial sensing Forecast model (SLPF) for traffic prediction, with several novel contributions, including a rank-based embedding technique to reduce the impact of noise in data, a spatial transfer matrix to overcome the spatial distribution shift from sensed locations to unsensed locations, and a multi-step training process that utilizes all available data to successively refine the model parameters for better accuracy. Extensive experiments on several real-world traffic datasets demonstrate its superior performance. Our source code is at https://github.com/zbliu98/SLPF

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Active Learning with Imperfect Labels: Optimal Labeler Assignment and Sample Selection

Active Learning (AL) is commonly used in applications where labeling data is expensive or time-consuming. In practice, however, labels are often noisy due to varying labeler expertise and annotation uncertainty, especially for complex or ambiguous samples. Learning from such imperfectly labeled data can degrade classifier performance. We propose an AL framework that explicitly accounts for label noise by optimally assigning labelers and selecting samples to minimize labeling error. Our approach, called OLAS (Optimal Labeler Assignment and Sampling), uses a noise model that depends on both labeler accuracy and model uncertainty to guide these decisions. We develop two tractable optimization formulations: one for assigning samples to labelers to minimize worst-case noise, and another for selecting samples while controlling overall label noise. Theoretical results provide closed-form solutions under mild conditions. Empirical evaluations on benchmark datasets and a real-world warranty claim classification problem show that OLAS achieves the highest or near-highest classification accuracy among existing AL strategies across most settings, using only a single label per sample.

cs.LG↗