Aggregation of Time Preferences and Comparability of Intergenerational Utilities

Wei Ma

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.36744

Aggregation of Time Preferences and Comparability of Intergenerational Utilities

Wei Ma

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Experimental evidence reveals that, in aggregating time preferences, a decision maker exhibits mild aversion to inequality across individuals' evaluations of a stream. Neither the utilitarian nor the maxmin aggregation rule can account for this finding. Building on principles concerning the comparability of intergenerational utilities and intergenerational fairness, this paper axiomatizes a family of aggregation rules that allow the decision maker to display varying degrees of inequality aversion. These rules fit well with experimental data.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Wei Ma. 2026-09-29. Aggregation of Time Preferences and Comparability of Intergenerational Utilities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36744

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Inherited Wage Dispersion and Optimal Discretion in a Dual-Rigidity TANK Model

How does an inherited cross-type wage gap enter Markov-perfect discretionary monetary policy when transfers are passive? In a two-agent New Keynesian model with sticky prices and type-specific own-lag wage adjustment, the gap changes implementable allocations and the second-order welfare loss. A positive lower bound establishes its value relevance; explicit rank conditions characterize when current price inflation, wage inflation, and the output gap fail to determine the implementing nominal rate. An illustrative parameterization satisfies these conditions, although the additional state explains little nominal-rate variance after conditioning on all three aggregate variables. Welfare comparisons with fixed rules are driven mainly by aggregate wage-inflation stabilization and do not isolate the value of distributional information. Unrestricted targeted transfers separate aggregate allocation from the legacy wage-gap transition. In the CES-consistent distribution block, optimal smoothing eliminates consumption dispersion, improves on immediate wage-gap elimination, and coincides under discretion and date-0 commitment.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

The Capacity Cost of Informational Screening

An advisor knows who would benefit from using a resource but cannot assign its use. Individuals have private assessments and may ignore advice. We study how their choices can respect a fixed usage limit. In our model, whenever coordination is possible, eliciting private assessments makes some harmful use unavoidable. Policies that maximize welfare, or even minimize harm, also forgo beneficial uses that direct assignment would permit. In those environments, observing assessments instead allows advice to achieve as much beneficial use as direct assignment, without harmful use. The loss therefore reflects the incentive cost of eliciting private beliefs while leaving use voluntary.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Toward an Attentional Model of Time Discounting

This paper proposes a new theory of time discounting. We assume that when decision makers evaluate a sequence of future rewards, they allocate more attention to large rewards and less attention to small rewards. Moreover, when attention is distributed over a longer time horizon, each period receives less attention. The reductions in attention lead to greater discounting of reward values, and the resulting discount factors follow a distribution similar to the multinomial logit function. We characterize such discount factors using two approaches: an axiomatic analysis based on the optimal discounting framework, and a neuro-computational mechanism based on a simple spiking neural network. The theory explains a wide range of anomalies, including the hidden-zero effect, S-shaped value function, intertemporal correlation aversion, concentration bias, and inconsistent planning. Also, it identifies new determinants for several well-documented phenomena, such as the common difference effect and risk aversion over time lotteries.

econ.TH↗