arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.36405

Finite-Horizon Reversible Investment under Multi-Factor Dynamics

Junkee Jeon·Takwon Kim·Jinwan Park·A. Max Reppen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study a finite-horizon reversible investment problem in which a risk-neutral firm adjusts capacity at a proportional purchase cost and a lower salvage value under multi-factor geometric Brownian motion. Via the singular control--optimal switching correspondence, the marginal value of capacity solves a family of parabolic double-obstacle problems. We prove existence, uniqueness and local Sobolev regularity of the strong solution, characterize investment, waiting and disinvestment regions by continuous, strictly separated free boundaries, and verify optimality of the reflected capacity process. Numerically, joint demand improvements shift both boundaries super-additively, 1.5--2.7 times as strongly at the disinvestment boundary, depending on factor correlation.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.MF

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junkee Jeon, Takwon Kim, Jinwan Park, A. Max Reppen. 2026-09-29. Finite-Horizon Reversible Investment under Multi-Factor Dynamics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36405

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Delegation or competition: optimal liquidation across dark and lit pools with information privilege

We study the optimal liquidation problem in both dark and lit pools for an investor delegating the execution of a large position to a broker, in a continuous-time setting with market impact and execution uncertainty. First, we design an optimal compensation scheme between the investor and a broker who owns dark pools, may internalize the client's order flow, and enjoys an information privilege over the rest of the market. We explicitly characterize the broker's optimal internalization, hedging, and routing strategies across the lit venue and the dark pools using BSDE theory. Second, we study a purely competitive model in which the investor liquidates directly on the open market against a crowd of strategic high-frequency traders, leading to a major-minor mean-field game for which we provide explicit solutions to the associated HJB Fokker-Planck system. Finally, we illustrate our results through numerical experiments, comparing the welfare and the price impact of the delegation regime with those of direct execution, and quantifying the economic value of broker intermediation.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

Maximum principle for robust utility optimization via Tsallis relative entropy

This paper investigates an optimal consumption-investment problem featuring recursive utility via Tsallis relative entropy. We establish a fundamental connection between this optimization problem and a quadratic backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE), demonstrating that the value function is the value process of the solution to this BSDE. Utilizing advanced BSDE techniques, we derive a novel stochastic maximum principle that provides necessary conditions for both the optimal consumption process and terminal wealth. Furthermore, we prove the existence of optimal strategy and analyze the coupled forward-backward system arising from the optimization problem.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

Optimal entry and exit for variance swaps: closed-form rules for the perpetual contract

Variance swaps are a convenient instrument for trading vega and convexity, and a listed contract now trades on Cboe. We ask when a trader should put such a position on and when she should take it off, and for a perpetual, continuously settled contract we answer both in closed form: each threshold is the unique root of a smooth-pasting equation in confluent hypergeometric functions. Under the pricing measure the question has no content, the mark-to-market being a martingale. Under the physical measure with a variance risk premium it becomes meaningful, and then reduces: the accrued variance separates exactly, the maturity, strike and costs are absorbed into a single forcing term whose sign fixes the geometry of the exercise region, and what is left on the perpetual is an affine reward on a CIR process, which the optimal-stopping literature already solves. Entering the position and exiting it are not mirror images. An exit rule follows from the premium and the trading spread, both observable. For the short --- the only side worth opening under the empirical sign of the premium --- an entry rule exists only for an interval of carrying charges, and even there triggers only deep in the upper tail of the physical law: a trader who is out of the market pays nothing to stay out, so an operational entry rule needs a cost of idle capital that the exit rule does not.

q-fin.MF↗