arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.35819

Exploring Causal Mechanisms with Generative Agent-Based Models

Xuan Liu·Haoyang Shang·Tanya Bhat·Haojian Jin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we explore using generative agent-based models for a classical ABM application: testing how individual-level behavioral rules produce collective phenomena. We introduce RePair, a method that calibrates simulation worlds, operationalizes candidate mechanisms as natural-language rules, estimates their effects through matched interventions, and examines behavioral traces. We assess the method by testing it in four simulation worlds grounded in established social-science models and empirical studies. Our results reveal that (1) natural-language rules can produce measurable collective effects; (2) rule comparisons can converge as configurations accumulate; and (3) behavioral traces connect collective effects to agents' actions and interactions, helping researchers evaluate the proposed causal process. Together, these findings show the feasibility of using generative agent-based models to explore causal mechanisms and provide practical guidance for producing reliable, interpretable explanations.

Explore related subjects

cs.MAcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xuan Liu, Haoyang Shang, Tanya Bhat, Haojian Jin. 2026-09-21. Exploring Causal Mechanisms with Generative Agent-Based Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35819

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

S$^2$-MAS: A Society-Scale Multi-Agent Simulation Framework with a 500-Million-Persona Resource

Simulating economic responses at society scale requires decision rules that respond to household circumstances and accounting rules that track their consequences. We introduce S$^2$-MAS, a multi-agent simulation framework with a resource of 500 million synthetic household personas. It combines trainable candidate-scoring policies, reusable financial scenarios and explicit state transitions. Trained with SFT + RLCD on 2.93 million examples, YN-mini-MLX achieves 74.55% accuracy and 38.37% question-macro F1 on held-out consumer financial-choice tasks, improving on the training-question majority baseline by 2.78 and 6.21 percentage points. A completed application evaluates 12 million distinct households in two purchase-funding conditions: 24 million one-shot choices feed 288 million monthly ledger states in 3 h 59 min on 14 GPUs. Jointly increasing purchase goals and approved limits produces heterogeneous consumption, cash and repayment paths, with much of the consumption variation arising from transitions between deferral and purchase. In a separate 1,060-household retrospective consumption experiment, standalone YN-master-9B has 3.42% lower annual MAE than the deterministic fully rational benchmark, alongside a 19.7% lower predicted population mean than observed. Information-timing tests show how year labels and later outcome information change decisions. Together, these experiments establish an executable alternative for studying heterogeneous household behavior with learned policies and explicit financial accounting.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

A Serious-Game Testbed for Self-Governing Human-Machine Institutions

AI agents no longer act alone: they cooperate, coordinate and compete within and between groups, increasingly alongside humans who are in, on or out of ``the loop''. Whether such mixed groups can govern themselves is an open question about machine behaviour and human-computer interaction that needs a testbed for hybrid institutions. We present Megabike, a multi-agent simulator and serious game with interdependent arenas for common-pool resource management, cooperative survival and constitutional choice. Riders sharing a megabike must agree their arrangements for steering, pedalling and distributing resources, and their political regime, while negotiating with rival bikes and avoiding an existential threat. Every rule is enforced by the simulator, every action is logged, and any seat can be taken by a human or a machine, so governance can be studied under well-defined metrics. We demonstrate Megabike with forty sessions in which language-model riders with cooperative, lazy, subversive or opposing dispositions chose regimes, elected leaders and expelled one another. The results show that different combinations of agent archetypes could produce unexpected and counterproductive outcomes. We conclude with extensions for systematic experiments mixing human and computational agents.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

Test-Time Communication in Trading Agent Swarms

Communication between agents has mostly been studied on tasks with a shared objective and fast, clear feedback. Trading has neither: each agent manages its own account, with decisions being scored by markets late and noisily. A trading swarm is thus a population of independent decision-makers rather than a team, for which convergence is a risk and not the goal. We ran 200 agents from four model families in groups of ten under five communication regimes, from isolation to message boards and shared notes, over seven US trading days (1 to 9 October 2026), logging everything each agent read before every decision. In two of the four families, communicating groups came to hold far more of the same stocks than the isolated group. A group's return was largely the return on what its members held in common. Seeing a post from a groupmate made an agent 7 percentage points more likely to reuse an eight-word phrase from it. Agents that started too close together to see each other's posts shared such a phrase in 14% of cases, the rate that common inputs produce. Seeing the post did not detectably change that morning's trades. Case studies traced the adoption of positions and decision rules over subsequent days, and communicating groups sold in step more often than isolated ones. Because isolated groups also converged on the same stocks, sometimes completely, assessments of herding need to measure excess convergence relative to a no-peer baseline.

cs.MA↗