Cardinality-Constrained Randomized Assortments with Balanced Market Share

Xiaotie Deng; Hanyu Li; Chenghua Liu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.35802

Cardinality-Constrained Randomized Assortments with Balanced Market Share

Xiaotie Deng·Hanyu Li·Chenghua Liu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Assortment optimization asks a seller which of $n$ products to display to each customer. Under the multinomial-logit (MNL) model, a revenue-maximizing policy may concentrate most purchases on only a few products. Balanced market share (BMS) limits this disparity by requiring every product to receive either zero aggregate sales or at least an $α$-fraction of the largest product's sales. We study randomized BMS under a per-assortment cardinality constraint: every displayed assortment contains at most $K$ products, although the seller may rotate a larger catalog across customers. This couples per-realization feasibility with aggregate balance over an exponential policy space. We resolve the model on all three algorithmic fronts. First, reweighting assortments by their MNL denominators turns the cardinality restriction into a single uniform-matroid rank inequality, yielding an exact compact sales-space formulation in which every feasible sales vector can be implemented by a policy supported on $O(n)$ assortments. Second, deciding whether there exists a feasible policy attaining a given revenue target is NP-complete even for $α=1$ and $K=2$, whereas optimization is polynomial-time solvable once the set of products with positive sales is prescribed. Third, despite this hardness, BMS confines all positive sales to one multiplicative band, and a geometric scale search combined with a standard multiple-choice-knapsack dynamic program yields an FPTAS. For every $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, it achieves at least a $(1-\varepsilon)$ fraction of the optimal expected revenue, preserves BMS and per-assortment cardinality exactly, and outputs a rational policy supported on $O(n)$ assortments.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Xiaotie Deng, Hanyu Li, Chenghua Liu. 2026-09-18. Cardinality-Constrained Randomized Assortments with Balanced Market Share. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35802

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

What Can Firms Do in the Face of Model Distillation?

Model distillation has become a major concern in the rapidly growing generative AI discourse. In its simplest form, distillation is the phenomenon where smaller firms can use data distilled from transcripts of conversations with powerful proprietary closed-weight models to train their own models, thus achieving reasonably high model quality but at much lower costs. Besides the legitimate safety and security concerns associated with distillation, another major issue is how it can also distort marketplace outcomes. This motivates us to initiate an exploration of the problem from an economic theory lens. We consider a setting with two players: an incumbent and a distilling competitor and characterize how the incumbent's model characteristics drive the incentives around how much the competitor should distill. We also consider the impact of distillation on key market outcomes like user-side surplus and the incumbent's utility. Our key contribution, however, is to study interventions for preventing or limiting distillation attacks. In this context, we study two settings: i) when it is possible, with a certain probability (which grows in the extent of distillation conducted), to detect an attack on the incumbent's model; and ii) when a distillation attack cannot be reliably detected. In the first setting, we show that penalty-based regulations can be very effective in completely deterring distillation, although it can have potentially adverse effects on market competition and user surplus. In the latter setting, we show that the incumbent can use self-distillation as a mitigation strategy. Importantly, the effectiveness of self-distillation depends on how cost-efficiently the incumbent can deploy a new self-distilled model on the market. On the positive side, self-distillation can preserve market competition thus protecting user surplus to some extent.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Vendster: An Evaluation Arena to Investigate How Forecasting Tool Quality Affects LLM Agent Behaviors in Buyer-Vendor Negotiation

Time-series forecasters are ranked almost entirely by accuracy metrics, but a forecast's decision value, its effect on the downstream decision, need not track accuracy and is rarely measured. This problem compounds as large language model (LLM) agents increasingly consume forecasters as tools, mediating them through stochastic, opaque policies. We present Vendster, an evaluation arena measuring how a forecaster's bias and prediction-interval width change the outcome of a buyer--vendor discount negotiation between two LLM agents. In the reference instance Vendster-M5, sampling base demand patterns from the M5 dataset, we evaluate two frontier-closed LLM families (Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.6 Sol) and two open ones (DeepSeek-V3.2 and Qwen3-235B-A22B). Model-generated forecasts raise sales target attainment by up to +17 percentage points (p<0.001), yet standard forecast evaluation metrics such as relWQL and MASE do not predict negotiation outcomes at a statistically significant level. To isolate the causal structure, we substitute in synthetic forecasts with controlled bias and interval width. Under-prediction bias significantly improves outcomes for agents that react more to the forecasts---dose-response slopes -0.387 and -0.416 (p<0.001). Interval width has no statistically significant effect at zero bias. These findings indicate that the direction of forecast bias and agent forecast-reactivity are more strongly associated with downstream outcomes than forecast accuracy. Vendster is fully customizable and released under CC BY-NC 4.0 at https://github.com/amazon-science/Vendster.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

PPA-Game: Characterizing and Learning Competitive Dynamics Among Online Content Creators

In this paper, we present the Proportional Payoff Allocation Game (PPA-Game), which characterizes situations where agents compete for divisible resources. In the PPA-game, agents select from available resources, and their payoffs are proportionately determined based on heterogeneous weights attributed to them. Such dynamics simulate content creators on online recommender systems like YouTube and TikTok, who compete for finite consumer attention, with content exposure reliant on inherent and distinct quality. We first conduct a game-theoretical analysis of the PPA-Game. While the PPA-Game does not always guarantee the existence of a pure Nash equilibrium (PNE), we identify prevalent scenarios ensuring its existence. Simulated experiments further prove that the cases where PNE does not exist rarely happen. Beyond analyzing static payoffs, we further discuss the agents' online learning about resource payoffs by integrating a multi-player multi-armed bandit framework. We propose an online algorithm facilitating each agent's maximization of cumulative payoffs over $T$ rounds. Theoretically, we establish that the regret of any agent is bounded by $O(\log^{1 + η} T)$ for any $η> 0$. Empirical results further validate the effectiveness of our online learning approach.

cs.GT↗