arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.35714

Competitive optimality in testing by betting via Bell-Cover randomization

Aaditya Ramdas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Bell and Cover showed that an investor who multiplies the initial unit of capital by an independent uniform random variable on $(0,2)$, and then uses the log-optimal portfolio, wins a head-to-head wealth comparison with probability at least one half against every independently randomized competitor. We explain very simply how this result transfers to testing by betting: for any composite null $\mathcal P$ and simple alternative $Q$, denoting $E^*$ as the corresponding numeraire e-variable, we show that $UE^*$ exceeds any other e-variable $E$ with probability at least half. Interestingly, we show that this competitive optimality result is actually equivalent to the numeraire inequality $\mathbb E_Q[E/E^*]\leq1$, and in general randomization only helps the numeraire and fails to improve the competitive advantage of an arbitrary e-variable. Under optional stopping with or without knowledge of $U$, we emphasize a key distinction between e-process validity and competitive optimality. We also show that competitive optimality comes at the price of expected log wealth and power: thresholding $UE^*$ at $1/α$ has sharp size at most $α/2$, but the factor of two actually disappears under optional stopping. Even after correcting for this factor of two, the test is dominated in conditional rejection probability by randomizing the testing threshold (randomized Markov's inequality). Thus, Bell-Cover randomization is optimal for a specific competitive objective, at the cost of others.

Explore related subjects

math.STcs.GTcs.ITmath.ITstat.MEstat.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aaditya Ramdas. 2026-09-28. Competitive optimality in testing by betting via Bell-Cover randomization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35714

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Intrinsic-dimension empirical Bernstein inequalities for bounded self-adjoint operators

Operator-valued concentration inequalities are foundational to the analysis of modern high-dimensional statistics and randomized algorithms. However, standard oracle bounds are frequently limited in practice: they require explicit a priori knowledge of the true variance, and often explicitly scale with the ambient dimension, rendering them vacuous for infinite-dimensional or heavily structured operators. Motivated by these challenges, we establish the first empirical Bennett and Bernstein inequalities for sums of independent, bounded, self-adjoint Hilbert-Schmidt operators. Our fully data-driven bounds replace the unknown variance with an empirical estimate and rely strictly on the intrinsic dimension rather than the ambient dimension. This structural shift yields computable, dimension-free guarantees with a sharper first-order asymptotic radius for non-isotropic random matrices and seamlessly extends to infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. We demonstrate that our empirical bounds achieve asymptotic sharpness with the best known oracle rates. Finally, as an independent byproduct, we derive novel empirical concentration guarantees for the intrinsic dimension itself.

math.ST↗
arXiv2026

Bentkus-type asymptotic e-values

Asymptotic e-values are emerging as a powerful alternative to asymptotic p-values, particularly in post-hoc inference and multiple testing, where significance levels may be data-dependent. Existing asymptotic e-values, however, suffer from the ``missing factor,'' a scaling inefficiency resulting in overly conservative inference. Drawing on the framework of near-optimal concentration inequalities developed by Bentkus in the 2000s, we introduce Bentkus-type asymptotic e-values and prove that they successfully eliminate the missing factor. We also demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that Bentkus-type e-values consistently deliver sharper inference than existing alternatives, leading to tighter post-hoc confidence intervals and higher rejection rates in multiple testing procedures.

math.ST↗
arXiv2026

The Spectra of the Henze-Zirkler and Henze-Wagner Operators for BHEP Tests

The Baringhaus-Henze-Epps-Pulley (BHEP) tests for multivariate normality are affine-invariant goodness-of-fit tests based on a Gaussian-weighted $L^2$ distance between empirical and Gaussian characteristic functions. In 1990, Henze and Zirkler expressed the limiting null distribution through the eigenvalues of an integral operator on the standard Gaussian space. In 1997, Henze and Wagner obtained a simpler covariance kernel and raised the problem of calculating the eigenvalues of the resulting operator on a Gaussian-weighted space. Although subsequent work treated the univariate case and numerical approximations in a few low dimensions, the complete all-dimensional spectral problem remained open. This paper determines both complete spectra for every dimension $d \in \mathbb{N}$ and every smoothing parameter $β> 0$. The two operators are shown to have the forms $\mathcal{X}_{β,d}^*\mathcal{X}_{β,d}$ and $\mathcal{X}_{β,d}\mathcal{X}_{β,d}^*$ for the same Hilbert-Schmidt operator $\mathcal{X}_{β,d}$. Consequently, their nonzero eigenvalues agree, including multiplicities, while the null space of the Henze-Zirkler operator is identified exactly. The Gaussian integral operator in the Henze-Wagner decomposition is diagonalized by Mehler's formula, and rotational symmetry confines the finite-rank correction to the sectors associated with spherical harmonics of degrees $0$, $1$, and $2$. The degree-$1$ and degree-$2$ eigenvalues are characterized by scalar transcendental equations, and the radial eigenvalues by an explicit pole-safe Fredholm determinant. The paper establishes nonnegativity, multiplicities, eigenfunction reconstruction, completeness, the trace identity, and a complete characterization of all exceptional pole cases.

math.ST↗