A citizen science behavioural dataset of an urban collective-risk dilemma on air pollution mitigation under resource inequality

Abstract

This article describes a behavioural dataset from a collective-risk dilemma public experiment carried out in Barcelona, Spain, within the citizen science \textit{xAire} air quality project. Participants played a ten-round game in groups of six, each deciding every round how many monetary units to contribute from a private endowment toward a shared target; groups that fell short forfeited all remaining capital. Three endowment treatments held the group total fixed: an equal condition and two unequal conditions in which low-endowment participants formed either the minority or the majority of the group. Data were collected at two public outdoor venues using a tablet-based interface under lab-in-the-field protocols. Participants were recruited on-site from a demographically heterogeneous pool of individuals passing through the venues, mostly local residents. The dataset comprises 462 participants across 77 six-player games, 4\,620 contribution decisions in total. Each participant record links the full ten-round contribution trajectory to initial endowment, wealth treatment, venue, district of residence and its measured nitrogen-dioxide concentration, and socio-demographic and attitudinal survey items covering gender, age, education, economic and working status, air-quality perception, fairness norms, environmental-justice beliefs, residential mobility, and community participation. The release provides raw and cleaned participant tables, a variable codebook, the survey instrument, the district-pollution linkage, and the preprocessing code.