Partitioning Time in Target Trial Emulation

Harold Tankpinou Zoumenou; Simon Ferreira; Charles Assaad; David Hajage; Fabrice Carrat; Alexandra Beurton; Nathanaël Lapidus; Daria Bystrova; Benjamin Glemain

arXiv · 2609.34576

Partitioning Time in Target Trial Emulation

Harold Tankpinou Zoumenou·Simon Ferreira·Charles Assaad·David Hajage·Fabrice Carrat·Alexandra Beurton·Nathanaël Lapidus·Daria Bystrova·Benjamin Glemain

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In target trial emulation, the treatment strategies that patients follow are inferred from the treatments they actually receive in routine care. However, in most settings, the outcome may preclude the observation of planned treatment, giving rise to immortal time bias through misclassification of treatment strategy, while markers of treatment response may influence subsequent treatment decisions, giving rise to time-varying confounding. A key step toward unbiased treatment effect estimation is to partition follow-up into sufficiently short time intervals to unfold the feedback relationships involving treatment and represent the resulting causal relations with a directed acyclic graph. In this study, we present the possible within-interval causal orderings induced by this partitioning, discuss their causal implications, and assess their plausibility across clinical settings. For each causal ordering, we derive the corresponding g-formula. Using ancestral multi-world networks and simulations, we show that the standard cloning-censoring-weighting estimator is invalid when treatment affects the outcome within a time interval, and we propose a modified version of the method that restores its validity in this setting. Finally, we analyze the consequences of choosing time intervals that are either excessively wide or excessively narrow, thereby formally establishing the need for time partitioning and providing practical guidance for selecting an appropriate partition based on the clinical setting.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Harold Tankpinou Zoumenou, Simon Ferreira, Charles Assaad, David Hajage, Fabrice Carrat, Alexandra Beurton, Nathanaël Lapidus, Daria Bystrova, Benjamin Glemain. 2026-09-28. Partitioning Time in Target Trial Emulation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34576

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Delaunay Weighted Two-sample Test for High-dimensional Data by Incorporating Geometric Information

Two-sample hypothesis testing is a fundamental problem with various applications, which faces new challenges in the high-dimensional context. To mitigate the issue of the curse of dimensionality, high-dimensional data are typically assumed to lie on a low-dimensional manifold. To incorporate geometric information in the data, we propose to apply the Delaunay triangulation and develop the Delaunay weight to measure the geometric proximity among data points. In contrast to existing similarity measures that only utilize pairwise distances, the Delaunay weight can take both the distance and direction information into account. A detailed computation procedure is developed to learn the unknown manifold and approximate the Delaunay weight. We further propose a novel nonparametric test statistic using the Delaunay weight matrix. Asymptotic normality under the null and consistency under the alternative of the test statistic are developed. Applied to simulated data, the new test shows robustness to the learning of the unknown manifold and exhibits substantial power gain if the distributions differ in the principal directions of covariance matrices. The proposed test also detects significant differences on a real dataset of mice protein expression levels.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Randomization Tests in Switchback Experiments

Switchback experiments assign an experimental unit, such as a market or a platform, to treatment or control over successive blocks of time. Inference can be challenging because these experiments often contain only a small number of randomized blocks, while outcomes may exhibit serial dependence, seasonality, and treatment effects that persist across periods. We develop a conditional randomization test for the null of no total treatment effect that is finite-sample valid under standard assumptions on temporal interference without requiring a parametric model for outcomes. We also develop randomization tests for these assumptions: a carryover test that assesses whether past assignments continue to affect outcomes beyond a prespecified horizon and a non-anticipation test that assesses whether future assignments affect current outcomes. For hypotheses about average treatment effects, we establish asymptotic validity of studentized randomization tests under additional regularity conditions. Finally, we derive power approximations and characterize the tradeoffs between experimental design choices, the number of informative randomized comparisons, and statistical power. Numerical experiments with stylized potential outcomes and a dynamic rideshare model illustrate finite-sample performance and implications for experimental design.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Minimum Specification Perturbation: Robustness as Distance-to-Falsification in Causal Inference

Empirical causal claims depend on many analyst decisions, from selecting covariates to choosing estimators. Existing robustness tools summarize how results vary across these choices, but, to the best of our knowledge, do not answer: \textbf{How many analyst decisions must change to reach a specification, which is a set of choices, whose confidence interval (CI) contains zero?} We introduce \emph{Minimum Specification Perturbation (MSP)}, the smallest number of changes. MSP is small under the null, grows with effect strength and captures distance-to-falsification information that dispersion-based summaries cannot report; when making decisions under weak effects, an MSP-based rule yields lower false-positive rates than dispersion-based rules. We show that Fragility Index and MSP measure orthogonal vulnerabilities: fragility to influential observations need not imply fragility to specification choices. On the LaLonde benchmark, MSP = 1 implies that one decision change makes the CI contain zero. We further provide exact permutation calibration under randomization and characterize computation, showing tractable cases under additive structure and NP-hardness in general.

stat.ME↗