arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.32880

The Influence of the Vocal Few: Evidence from Social Media Comments

Dante Donati·Lena Song
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Online comment sections let a small number of vocal individuals reach far beyond their own networks. We conduct a large-scale field experiment on Facebook that randomizes the presence and stance of comments beneath posts for a racial justice organization, reaching around one million U.S. users. Opposing comments increase reactions, comments, and link clicks by 15-43 percent relative to no comments, whereas supportive comments have little effect. A complementary survey experiment shows that similar opposing comments make attitudes less progressive and reduce donations to the organization. Through a common feature of online platforms, the vocal few can exert outsized influence.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNcs.SIq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dante Donati, Lena Song. 2026-09-26. The Influence of the Vocal Few: Evidence from Social Media Comments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32880

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Big Wins, Small Net Gains: Direct and Spillover Effects of First Industry Entries in Puerto Rico

I study how first sizable industry entries reshape local and neighboring labor markets in Puerto Rico. Using over a decade of quarterly municipality--industry data (2014Q1--2025Q1), I identify ``first sizable entries'' as large, persistent jumps in establishments, covered employment, and wage bill, and treat these as shocks to local industry presence at the municipio--industry level. Methodologically, I combine staggered-adoption difference-in-differences estimators that are robust to heterogeneous treatment timing with an imputation-based event-study approach, and I use a doubly robust difference-in-differences framework that explicitly allows for interference through pre-specified exposure mappings on a contiguity graph. The estimates show large and persistent direct gains in covered employment and wage bill in the treated municipality--industry cells over 0--16 quarters. Same-industry neighbors experience sizable short-run gains that reverse over the medium run, while within-municipality cross-industry and neighbor all-industries spillovers are small and imprecisely estimated. Once these spillovers are taken into account and spatially robust inference and sensitivity checks are applied, the net regional 0--16 quarter effect on covered employment is positive but modest in magnitude and estimated with considerable uncertainty. The results imply that first sizable entries generate substantial local gains where they occur, but much smaller and less precisely measured net employment gains for the broader regional economy, highlighting the importance of accounting for spatial spillovers when evaluating place-based policies.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Identification and Estimation of Multidimensional Screening

We study the identification and estimation of a multidimensional screening model in which a monopolist sells a product with multiple continuous attributes to consumers with private information about their multidimensional preferences. Optimal screening excludes ``low-type" consumers, bunches ``medium-type" consumers, and perfectly screens the ``high types." Assuming a quadratic, additively separable cost function, we identify sufficient conditions to recover the joint distribution of preferences and marginal costs from data on individual choices and payments in a single market. We propose estimators for these objects, establish their asymptotic properties, and assess their small-sample performance using Monte Carlo experiments. Finally, we illustrate our method using synthetic data on Chinese wireless service constructed using estimates from \cite{clx19}.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Should I State or Should I Show? Aligning AI with Human Preferences

The proliferation of AI agents introduces a new principal-agent problem which stems from human principals' difficulty in articulating preferences. We report results from an experiment focused on mitigating this problem via revealed preferences from choice data. Compared to stated preference from human-written prompts, individuals communicate their preferences more effectively through choices, with as few as two sufficing to match prompts' predictive value. This gap largely reflects subjects' difficulty in translating preferences into prompts and is largest among those exhibiting more Allais-type behavioral patterns. Subjects also misperceive the approaches' relative performance, often choosing the less accurate one.

econ.GN↗