arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.32635

Trust the Brand, Lose Control: How Identity Hijacks LLM Agent Orchestration

Xutao Mao·Rui Qian·Linghan Chen·Yudong Gao·Junchi Liao·Jiulin Cai·Jinman Zhao·Cong Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

LLM agents now execute tasks end to end with permission to change real systems and increasingly orchestrate subagents that differ in capability and cost. Prior work treats the choice of subagent as an optimization problem. Yet the orchestrator makes this choice from the identities that subagents display, and an attacker can spoof them. Displayed identity thus decides operational authority, meaning who is trusted to check the work and who is allowed to change it. As a result, a risky subagent can keep authority over execution even after other evidence contradicts it. We introduce TrustFork, an LLM agent safety benchmark with 1,890 tasks and 27,826 valid trajectories across 16 agent systems. These systems run eight orchestrators under the OpenCode, OpenClaw, and Pi harnesses. In each task, one subagent carries a risky goal while the other three stay aligned with the user, so contradicting evidence can exist. A task can also change the identity a subagent displays without changing the model behind it, which lets us trace a shift in authority to the label. Our analysis shows that even when another subagent contradicts the risky response, the orchestrator still acts on it in 72.0% of cases on average, most often in the systems with the least terminal harm. Swapping the family labels nearly triples how often the orchestrator obtains the risky response. A safer response is available in 84.0% of tasks, yet it decides the outcome in only 25.0%. The harness also decides which responses reach the orchestrator. Among three runtime defenses, hiding identity cues helps most consistently, while verifying before action helps only when the harness returns enough evidence. TrustFork shows that production agent orchestration must bind authority to evidence before execution causes harm. Our project is in https://henrymao2004.github.io/agent-orchestration-safety/.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xutao Mao, Rui Qian, Linghan Chen, Yudong Gao, Junchi Liao, Jiulin Cai, Jinman Zhao, Cong Wang. 2026-09-26. Trust the Brand, Lose Control: How Identity Hijacks LLM Agent Orchestration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32635

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Peer-Relative Trust-Guided Update Screening for Robust Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning under Label-Flipping Attacks

Trust and reputation mechanisms can reduce the influence of malicious clients in federated learning (FL), but strict update filtering is difficult under non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data because honest local updates may temporarily reduce performance on a shared validation proxy. Extending an earlier trust-based semi-decentralized FL (SDFL) framework, this paper operationalizes the trust signals and introduces peer-relative update screening that combines a robust validation-utility score with direction- and norm-based update quality. The method is evaluated with 50 MNIST clients, 20% persistent label-flip attackers, Dirichlet heterogeneity levels of 0.5 and 0.1, 100 communication rounds, and five paired random seeds. Under moderate heterogeneity, the proposed method reaches 98.37% final accuracy while rejecting 95.82% of malicious updates and retaining 90.30% of benign updates; the final benign and malicious trust distributions are completely separated (KS=1.00). Under severe heterogeneity, it reaches 95.25% accuracy, rejects 88.55% of malicious updates, and retains 76.90% of benign updates (KS=0.96). Trust weighting alone preserves slightly higher utility in the most heterogeneous condition, but accepts all malicious submissions. The results therefore distinguish influence mitigation from explicit containment and quantify the utility-selectivity trade-off introduced by screening. The study provides an empirically validated off-chain governance core that can feed blockchain-based audit and incentive layers in SDFL.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

SPECTER: Covert Data Exfiltration from Air-Gapped Systems via USB Power Modulation

We present SPECTER, a post-compromise covert channel that uses host-side USB power control to exfiltrate information from air-gapped and network-segregated systems. A transmitter with administrative privileges encodes bits through USB power-management or device-state operations without placing the payload in USB data transfers. The resulting signals are recovered through three alternative receiver paths based on smartphone charging states, visible peripheral behavior, and near-field RF activity. Experiments on Windows 10 and Ubuntu 22.04 demonstrate the channel on commodity hardware, with charging-state signaling at 0.2-0.25 bit/s across Android and iOS devices and peripheral-state signaling at 1.0 bit/s using a USB mouse on Windows. RF reception is demonstrated using a software-defined radio with a loop antenna in direct contact with the USB cable. Channel availability and observable side effects depend on the host configuration, connected device, and receiver path. These results identify host-side USB power control as a mechanism for low-rate exfiltration of short secrets and motivate treating USB power-management and device-state events as security-relevant telemetry.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Parameters efficient language model with latent cross-attention for IoT intrusion detection

Language models have shown strong potential for intrusion detection, but their high memory and computational demands make them difficult to deploy in resource-constrained IoT environments. In this work, we propose a compact Transformer-based architecture that compresses the input into a small latent space before processing it with a minimal Transformer core. We analyze nine compression configurations, compare parameter sharing with layer stacking, and evaluate our approach against SecurityBERT on two IoT intrusion detection datasets, Edge-IIoTset and CICIoT2023. With only 306k non-embedding parameters and 1.6M parameters in total (6MB), our model is about 7x smaller than SecurityBERT (11.2M parameters, 45MB). With the same privacy-preserving encoding, it outperforms SecurityBERT by about 2 points of macro F1-score on Edge-IIoTset and is within 0.7 points on CICIoT2023. It is also about 89x faster on a simulated edge device. We further show that a single Transformer layer is sufficient, and that parameter sharing matches layer stacking with up to 66% fewer parameters. These findings show that lightweight Transformer-based architectures can provide a practical and accurate solution for intrusion detection in resource-constrained IoT settings

cs.CR↗