Portmanteau Goodness-of-Fit Tests in the Presence of Simple, Mixed, and Multiple Seasonal Autocorrelation

Matteo Grigolettto; Francesco Lisi

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.32381

Portmanteau Goodness-of-Fit Tests in the Presence of Simple, Mixed, and Multiple Seasonal Autocorrelation

Matteo Grigolettto·Francesco Lisi

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Standard diagnostic procedures for assessing the goodness of fit of linear models include tests of the null hypothesis of no residual autocorrelation against the alternative of linear dependence. The literature proposes several portmanteau tests for residual autocorrelation in SARMA models, mainly focusing on two cases: short-term and single-seasonal autocorrelation. Since many time series exhibit multiple seasonal patterns, whose periodic components may interact with one another, diagnostic tests for residual autocorrelation in a multi-seasonal framework are needed. However, the literature still lacks portmanteau tests specifically designed for multiple seasonal autocorrelation. This paper addresses this gap by extending classical portmanteau tests to settings with multiple seasonalities. In addition, the proposed approach jointly tests for both short-term and multiple seasonal residual autocorrelation. Test statistics and their asymptotic distributions are defined. Then, Monte Carlo simulations are used to evaluate the performance of the tests and the consistency with the expected results is assessed using statistical tests. The results suggest that the proposed extension can serve as a useful goodness-of-fit diagnostic tool for the class of mSARIMA models. An application to road traffic data is also provided.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Matteo Grigolettto, Francesco Lisi. 2026-09-26. Portmanteau Goodness-of-Fit Tests in the Presence of Simple, Mixed, and Multiple Seasonal Autocorrelation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32381

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Univariate-Guided Interaction Modeling

We propose a procedure for sparse regression with pairwise interactions, by generalizing the Univariate Guided Sparse Regression (UniLasso) methodology. A central contribution is our introduction of TripletScan, which screens a pair $(j,k)$ using the coefficient of $X_jX_k$ in the local regression of the response on $1$, $X_j$, $X_k$, and $X_jX_k$. The retained products are incorporated either jointly with the main effects through UniLasso, yielding uniPairs, or after a first-stage main-effects fit, yielding uniPairs-2stage. For the UniLasso components of the procedures, we prove false-positive exclusion and uniform coefficient-error bounds. In simulations and an HIV drug-resistance application, the proposed procedures produce substantially smaller fitted models than competing interaction methods while retaining competitive predictive performance.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Factoring A-Optimality into D-Optimality and Sphericity

The D criterion measures the volume of the joint confidence ellipsoid for the linear model coefficients and ignores its shape, so designs with the same D value can estimate individual effects with different variances. Meanwhile, A-optimality minimizes average coefficient variance. With both criteria expressed as information values, A equals D multiplied by a sphericity index for the same ellipsoid. In a fixed coefficient basis, sphericity further factors into coefficient-variance balance and a determinant-based correlation component. In five published screening comparisons, the A-optimal design has a larger correlation component despite slightly poorer variance balance; in three it also has a smaller D value. In a seven-run family of designs that all tie under D, the two with equal coefficient variances have the lowest A value. Both sphericity components can be calculated directly from standard errors and estimate correlations available in statistical software. After whitening by a prediction moment matrix, the same determinant-sphericity factorization applies to the I-criterion.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Testing the equality of parameters in fixed and increasing dimension

This paper proposes a general and unified framework for testing the equality of a broad class of parameters, defined as a smooth function of expectations of symmetric kernels, across multiple independent populations. We consider two test statistics, a Wald-type statistic and an ANOVA-type statistic. The asymptotic distribution of the first one is derived under a fixed-dimension regime, whereas the second one is studied under both fixed and increasing-dimension regimes, where the parameter dimension diverges with the sample size. Based on these limiting distributions, we construct test procedures enabling asymptotically exact inference without parametric assumptions. Additionally, an alternative null distribution estimator based on a weighted bootstrap approximation is studied, which is applicable to the ANOVA-type statistic under a fixed-dimension regime. The finite-sample performance and computational efficiency of the proposed procedures are evaluated through an extensive simulation study and a real dataset application.

stat.ME↗