arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.32379

Measurement Boundaries in LLM Financial Agent Evaluation: Fixed-Tape Execution and Multi-Defect Auditing

Weicheng Xue
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

What controls are needed to interpret execution performance and audit scores in LLM agent evaluations? We study two limits on these interpretations in a financial agent harness. In Study~A, comparing independent runs under idealized and stressed execution on three synthetic settings that share one 24-day upward phase mixes the execution rule with fresh model responses and portfolio feedback: the parsed decision paths agree in only $19.8\%$ of $450$ pairs. Replaying each stored response tape through both execution destinations gives a narrower result. Conditional on those responses, stressed execution changes total return by $-0.0170$ (95\% interval $[-0.0230,-0.0117]$), or $10.4\%$ of the idealized baseline, and ten seed clusters do not resolve the model ranking. Study~B corrects an incomplete answer key and replaces legacy tasks with matched zero-, one-, and two-defect tasks under an explicit multi-label prompt. The drop in target violation recall from one to two defects is positive in five of six combinations of auditor and source (median $0.267$), with three surviving Holm correction. Yet the auditor that includes both target labels most often has micro-precision $0.149$, emits findings on $98/100$ zero-defect tasks, and returns the exact dual-defect set in only $21/100$ cases. Target recall by itself therefore gives a poor account of audit quality on this construction. The studies address different limits: what an execution comparison estimates, and what target recall captures. Together, they show how fixed conditions and diagnostic controls bound the claims a score can support.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIcs.CEcs.SE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Weicheng Xue. 2026-09-26. Measurement Boundaries in LLM Financial Agent Evaluation: Fixed-Tape Execution and Multi-Defect Auditing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32379

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Stochastic Engrams for Efficient Continual Learning

The ability to learn continuously in artificial neural networks (ANNs) is often limited by catastrophic forgetting, a phenomenon in which new knowledge becomes dominant. By taking mechanisms of memory encoding in neuroscience (i.e., engrams) as inspiration, we propose a novel approach that integrates stochastically-activated engrams as a gating mechanism for metaplastic binarized neural networks (mBNNs). This method leverages the computational efficiency of mBNNs combined with the robustness of probabilistic memory traces to mitigate forgetting and maintain the model's reliability. Previously validated metaplastic optimization techniques have been incorporated to further enhance synaptic stability. Compared to baseline binarized models and benchmark fully connected continual learning approaches, our method is the only strategy capable of achieving average accuracies over 70% in both class-incremental and domain-incremental MNIST benchmarks, matching full-precision state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we achieve a significant reduction in peak GPU and RAM usage, under 5% and 20%, respectively, as well as an ~8x reduction in memory footprint compared to full precision counterparts. Our findings demonstrate (A) an improved stability vs. plasticity trade-off, (B) reduced memory intensiveness, and (C) enhanced performance in binarized architectures. By uniting principles of neuroscience and efficient computing, we offer new insights into the design of scalable and robust deep learning systems.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

DRAN: A Distribution and Relation Adaptive Network for Spatio-temporal Forecasting

Spatio-temporal forecasting remains challenging under non-stationary environments because both data distributions and spatial relations evolve over time. Temporal normalization and de-normalization are widely used to mitigate distribution shifts, but they may distort inter-node relationships and thereby impair spatial dependency modeling. To address these issues, we propose the Distribution and Relation Adaptive Network (DRAN) for spatio-temporal forecasting. DRAN incorporates a Spatial Factor Learner (SFL) module, which enables effective normalization and de-normalization while preserving spatial dependencies in spatio-temporal systems. To model evolving spatial interactions, DRAN further proposes the Dynamic-Static Fusion Learner (DSFL) module. DSFL decomposes features into static and dynamic components and adaptively fuses them according to input variability. Experiments on six benchmark datasets show that DRAN outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Additional analyses demonstrate that SFL consistently reduces spatial-relation distortion across multiple normalization schemes, whereas DSFL captures complementary static and dynamic dependencies and adjusts their contributions according to temporal variability.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

AYLA: Architecting a loss landscape in shallow neural networks to accelerate feature recovery

Feature learning in shallow neural networks exhibits rich yet fragile dynamics, including prolonged plateaus, abrupt phase transitions, and sensitivity to optimization hyperparameters. While recent theoretical work has characterized these behaviors through the geometry of loss landscapes, saddle escape mechanisms, and emergent scaling laws, practical methods for actively shaping these dynamics remain limited. In this paper, we introduce AYLA, a principled loss reparameterization framework that dynamically modulates gradient magnitudes during training without altering the location of stationary points or optimal solutions. AYLA applies a smooth, sigmoid-controlled power-law transformation to empirical loss, yielding a state-dependent effective learning rate that accelerates descent in flat or saddle-dominated regions while stabilizing late-stage optimization. Crucially, AYLA preserves all critical points of the original objective, acting solely as a monotone transformation that reshapes optimization trajectories rather than objectives. We evaluate AYLA in controlled teacher student settings using two-layer tanh networks trained on synthetic Gaussian data. Across stochastic gradient descent and multiple loss-exponent schedules, AYLA consistently improves feature recovery. This evidence is observed in terms of weight alignment, per-neuron cosine similarity, hidden-activation correlation, and spectral properties of learned representations, while AYLA maintains competitive or faster loss convergence. Spectral analyses further demonstrate that AYLA mitigates rank collapse and promotes richer internal representations, signaling a transition from lazy to active feature-learning regimes. AYLA offers a lightweight, theoretically grounded way to improve shallow-network optimization, especially in resource-limited or noise-sensitive settings.

cs.LG↗