arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.32118

KKTCode: Asymptotically Optimal Linear Codes for Noisy Feedback AWGN Channels

Hongjae Nam·Jonggyu Jang·Vishrant Tripathi·David J. Love
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The design of optimal causal linear feedback schemes for additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels with noisy output feedback has remained an open problem for over 60 years. Prior work has focused on restricted policy classes, especially passive (uncoded) noisy output feedback, where only the transmitter performs feedback coding. However, passive noisy output feedback fundamentally lacks the degrees of freedom required to attain the information-theoretic performance limit in general. In this paper, we consider the active (coded) noisy output feedback setting, where both the transmitter and the receiver perform feedback coding. We then develop a constructive KKT-optimal active linear feedback design that asymptotically attains the Elias-Butman SNR converse bound, thereby establishing MSE/SNR optimality over the entire class of causal linear schemes. Furthermore, we prove that the optimal passive feedback solution is recovered as a special case of the active design. This passive solution admits a Geometric Toeplitz (GT) structure with a Chance-Love (CL)-style one-shot polynomial characterization, and can be computed with O(log T) complexity. Thus, our results provide an affirmative answer to the long-standing optimality question for noisy output feedback under causal linear feedback coding, and our numerical results support the theoretical findings.

Explore related subjects

cs.ITmath.IT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hongjae Nam, Jonggyu Jang, Vishrant Tripathi, David J. Love. 2026-09-26. KKTCode: Asymptotically Optimal Linear Codes for Noisy Feedback AWGN Channels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Anonymous Shamir's Secret Sharing via Reed-Solomon Codes Against Permutations, Insertions, and Deletions

In this work, we study the performance of Reed-Solomon codes against an adversary that first permutes the symbols of the codeword and then performs insertions and deletions. This adversarial model is motivated by the recent interest in fully anonymous secret-sharing schemes [EBG+24],[BGI+24]. A fully anonymous secret-sharing scheme has two key properties: (1) the identities of the participants are not revealed before the secret is reconstructed, and (2) the shares of any unauthorized set of participants are uniform and independent. In particular, the shares of any unauthorized subset reveal no information about the identity of the participants who hold them. In this work, we first make the following observation: Reed-Solomon codes that are robust against an adversary that permutes the codeword and then deletes symbols from the permuted codeword can be used to construct ramp threshold secret-sharing schemes that are fully anonymous. Then, we show that over large enough fields of size, there are $[n,k]$ Reed-Solomon codes that are robust against an adversary that arbitrary permutes the codeword and then performs $n-2k+1$ insertions and deletions to the permuted codeword. This implies the existence of a $(k-1, 2k-1, n)$ ramp secret sharing scheme that is fully anonymous. That is, any $k-1$ shares reveal nothing about the secret, and, moreover, this set of shares reveals no information about the identities of the players who hold them. On the other hand, any $2k-1$ shares can reconstruct the secret without revealing their identities. We also provide explicit constructions of such schemes based on previous works on Reed-Solomon codes correcting insertions and deletions. The constructions in this paper give the first gap threshold secret-sharing schemes that satisfy the strongest notion of anonymity together with perfect reconstruction.

cs.IT↗
arXiv2026

Unequal Error Protection for Digital Semantic Communication with Channel Coding

This paper investigates unequal error protection (UEP) in digital semantic communication, where semantically important bits require substantially higher reliability than less critical ones. To characterize this heterogeneity, we introduce a novel perspective that treats learned bit-flip probabilities of semantic bits as target error protection levels, thereby directly linking semantic importance to bit-level reliability. This formulation reveals that the required protection levels of the semantic bits may differ by several orders of magnitude, making short-block coding more advantageous than conventional long-block designs. Motivated by this, we develop two UEP frameworks that minimize total blocklength under heterogeneous reliability constraints. First, we propose a bit-level UEP framework based on repetition coding, providing an analytically tractable solution that precisely meets per-bit protection requirements. Second, to improve energy and blocklength efficiency, we design a block-level UEP framework in which the semantic bits are partitioned into short blocks with similar protection levels. Guided by finite blocklength capacity analysis, we derive a closed-form threshold condition for beneficial partitioning and develop a systematic algorithm for integrating modern channel codes. Simulation results on image transmission tasks demonstrate substantial gains in both task performance and transmission efficiency compared with conventional equal-protection schemes.

cs.IT↗
arXiv2026

Large Language Models are Shannon Lossy Compressors Not Solomonoff Induction Estimators: Self-improvement and Singularity Are Not Near Without Symbolic Model Synthesis

We connect two questions in Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT), Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): whether LLMs estimate Solomonoff induction, and whether they can self-improve towards an AI Singularity. We provide theoretical, methodological and empirical answers in the negative but show how limits can be circumvented. Cross-entropy, negative log-likelihood and related next-token objectives cannot alone implement Solomonoff induction: they fit supplied conditionals rather than a program-weighted universal mixture. More computation can improve fit within a fixed objective but cannot change its inductive principle without external hyperparameter or architectural tuning; they alone do not deliver Solomonoff-Levin optimal prediction. For finite learners and observers, theoretical boundaries become less decisive and approaches diverge. Resource-bounded estimators are finite mechanism-search tools whose divergence does not violate algorithmic information conservation. All 26 served language-model checkpoints across five pre-training families, 0.8-35 billion parameters and 1.9-8.5 bits per weight, evaluated at their commitments over a closed alphabet, violate the dominance guarantee defining a universal mixture. Against a 3.32-bit bound attained by a genuine mixture, the best model trails a Krichevsky-Trofimov code by 4.5 bits, the median by 36 and the worst by 128; excess grows to every stream's end rather than settling to a constant. Served conditionals fail to form a mixture over the declared class in 79 of 91 checkpoint-designs; neither scale nor post-training closes the gap. Frontier developers adopt neurosymbolic approaches, including Fable and Astra, incorporating model synthesis via neurosymbolic computation. They are no longer purely statistical LLMs, making them better, though still limited, candidates for higher forms of induction & model synthesis.

cs.IT↗