arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.31708

RadarVox: Radar-Audio Multimodal Cocktail-Party Speech Separation with Speaker-Aware Cross-Modal Matching

Yanlin Xu·Yiwei Ru·Mupei Li·Yongji Liu·Jie Wang·Zhenan Sun
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In embodied voice interaction, cocktail-party speech perception requires both speech separation and speaker attribution across machine-generated and human speech sources. However, conventional audio-only blind source separation remains permutation ambiguous, making the correspondence between separated streams and physical speakers unclear. This paper presents RadarVox, a radar-audio multimodal benchmark for identity-aware cocktail-party speech separation. RadarVox provides acoustic mixtures and source-level radar displacement signals from loudspeaker-emitted and human speech, enabling source-aware speaker assignment. FMCW radar captures laryngeal mechanical motion, providing speaker-specific spatial-motion cues unavailable to a single-channel microphone. We inject radar-derived priors into a DPRNN separator via gated fusion and learn a speaker-aware cross-modal matcher to associate unordered speech streams with radar-observed speakers. Experiments on multi-speaker mixtures show that radar cues provide complementary benefits, achieving scale-invariant signal-to-distortion ratio (SI-SDR) values of 9.75 dB and 7.13 dB in two- and three-speaker scenarios, respectively. More importantly, the proposed method improves ordered SI-SDR by more than 13 dB over audio-only methods while achieving over 80\% speaker assignment accuracy.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.MMcs.SD

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yanlin Xu, Yiwei Ru, Mupei Li, Yongji Liu, Jie Wang, Zhenan Sun. 2026-09-20. RadarVox: Radar-Audio Multimodal Cocktail-Party Speech Separation with Speaker-Aware Cross-Modal Matching. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31708

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Read What You Hear: Reference-Free Hypotheses Evaluation with Acoustic Discrepancy

Automatic speech recognition systems commonly rely on reference transcriptions for evaluation, while reference-free approaches often depend on internal confidence estimation or auxiliary language models. We propose READ (Reference-free Hypothesis Evaluation with Acoustic Discrepancy), a novel metric that evaluates ASR hypotheses directly from the speech signal. READ emphasizes the acoustic grounding of hypotheses. It uses a pretrained auto-regressive TTS model to compute the conditional likelihood of speech tokens given a text hypothesis, to measure fine-grained acoustic discrepancy between speech and text. Without additional training, READ can be applied for hypothesis refinement. Experiments show that READ correlates with specific recognition errors and improves ASR outputs, achieving up to 20\% relative error rate reduction, with particularly strong gains under noisy conditions.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

A Tutorial on Generative Models for Music Audio

Music audio generation spans instrumental clips, full songs with vocals, edits of existing recordings, and systems that play alongside a musician in real time. This monograph explains the methods behind these systems for readers familiar with neural-network training who are new to music generation. It introduces neural audio codecs and autoencoders, autoregressive and masked token models, diffusion and flow matching, sampling acceleration, and preference optimization in a shared notation. Worked examples connect training objectives and sampling procedures to published systems. The application sections relate the musical requirements of instrumental generation, songs, editing, and live performance to model design. Comparison tables record representations, methods, inputs, tasks, and release information documented in papers and official sources. Symbolic composition, speech, and sound effects are included where they connect to music audio. We explain how to interpret automatic metrics and learned judges, design and report listening tests, and assess evidence about data provenance, memorization, attribution, and output detection. Selected legal decisions and disputes illustrate the implications for training and release. The reviewed systems combine established generative paradigms with new representations, planning stages, and post-training procedures. Differences in data, scale, and evaluation limit what cross-system comparisons can establish about the sources of reported gains.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Integrated Spoofing-Robust Automatic Speaker Verification via a Three-Class Formulation and LLR

Spoofing-robust automatic speaker verification (SASV) aims to integrate automatic speaker verification (ASV) and countermeasure (CM). A popular solution is fusion of independent ASV and CM scores. To better modeling SASV, some frameworks integrate ASV and CM within a single network. However, these solutions are typically bi-encoder based, offer limited interpretability, and cannot be readily adapted to new evaluation parameters without retraining. Based on this, we propose a unified end-to-end framework via a three-class formulation that enables log-likelihood ratio (LLR) inference from class logits for a more interpretable decision pipeline. Experiments show comparable performance to existing methods on ASVSpoof5 and better results on SpoofCeleb. The visualization and analysis also prove that the three-class reformulation provides more interpretability.

eess.AS↗