arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.30623

CraftTrace: Unflattening Videos into Malleable, Creation-Inspired Structures for Generative Editing

Boyu Li·Yuqian Zhou·Duotun Wang·Ding Li·Zhe Lin·Nanxuan Zhao·Zeyu Wang·Lin-Ping Yuan·Hongbo Fu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent generative video editing models enable video content modification (e.g., changing a character) but target short clips. Extending them to full multi-shot videos requires tedious work to locate relevant content across shots, segment it into clips, craft context-aware editing prompts for each clip, and repeatedly articulate complex editing intent. To address this, we explore an interaction paradigm for editing through underlying video structures (e.g., scripts, scenes, characters, shots, and their relationships). We present CraftTrace, an interactive prototype that transforms a video into a malleable, multilevel structure for generative editing. Users work in task-centric workspaces to modify elements or reshape relationships, while an AI agent translates and propagates changes across the video. A user study and expert review show that this structure helps users understand videos, formulate and refine editing intent, and explore alternatives, supporting rapid prototyping during early-stage exploration and full video post-production.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Boyu Li, Yuqian Zhou, Duotun Wang, Ding Li, Zhe Lin, Nanxuan Zhao, Zeyu Wang, Lin-Ping Yuan, Hongbo Fu. 2026-09-24. CraftTrace: Unflattening Videos into Malleable, Creation-Inspired Structures for Generative Editing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30623

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It

Generative AI now produces images and poems that people cannot reliably distinguish from human-made work, so people often judge for themselves who made a work. We examine how these perceived-authorship judgments relate to aesthetic preference. In a public online AI Art Turing Test, 11,123 people judged whether each of 50 pictures (26 AI-generated) was made by a human and were asked for their favourite. Among the 9,152 respondents who judged their favourite, a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was the respondent's favourite, holding respondent and picture fixed. The association was similar for AI-generated and human-made favourites, was positive for all 50 pictures, and appeared under every reported detection strategy. Respondents most negative about AI art chose fewer AI-generated favourites (47% against 60% among the most positive) but more often believed them human-made, partly because others also judged those pictures human. As a result, in every opinion group a third to two fifths of respondents named an AI-generated favourite they believed human-made. A reanalysis of a published experiment on AI-generated poetry, in which 230 people rated each poem before judging its authorship, found the same pattern, although the AI poems were rated higher. When provenance is hidden, liking and perceived human authorship travel together, consistent with aesthetic response serving as evidence of a human maker and with beliefs about the maker shaping enjoyment. The findings qualify research on bias against AI art, which typically uses explicit labels, and inform AI disclosure policy.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

LogicTree: Object-Oriented Writing for Structured Human-AI Academic Authoring

Academic writing is non-linear, iterative, and structure-driven, requiring authors to develop fragmented ideas into arguments with local coherence and global consistency. However, current AI-assisted tools primarily exchange linear prompts and free-form text, forcing authors to reconstruct generated logic and repeatedly verify its alignment with their structural intentions. We propose object-oriented writing (OOW), an OOD-inspired representation and interaction paradigm in which persistent writing objects serve as shared, manipulable referents for authors and AI. We instantiate OOW in LogicTree, an Overleaf-integrated prototype that combines a hierarchical object representation with a structure-grounded writing assistance module for author-initiated generation and issue-grounded revision and a structural logical review module for inspecting local coherence and global consistency. A within-subjects study (N=12) provides initial evidence that, in controlled academic writing tasks, LogicTree helps users structure ideas, reduces workload, and improves measured logical quality compared with a conversational baseline.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

How K-12 Teachers Adapt Generative AI to Local Classroom Demands: Cultural Distance Between GenAI Defaults and Everyday Teaching Practices

Generative AI (GenAI) is entering K-12 classrooms, but its default culture does not always fit local teaching. Existing accounts either treat this misfit as macro-level structural bias or examine it through single-case studies; neither captures how much work teachers must do to make outputs usable across tasks. This exploratory, theory-building qualitative study introduces cultural distance, the gap between GenAI's default cultural repertoire and the situated demands of teachers' practice. Through interviews with 30 K-12 teachers who frequently use GenAI, 10 each from South Africa, Taiwan, and the United States, we identified three levels defined by the effort teachers invested and whether it yielded a usable output: low (minor edits), mid (sustained prompting and revision), and high (structural gaps rooted in unsupported languages, undigitized knowledge, or policy filters that no teacher effort can close). We present cultural distance as a promising framework requiring further examination and draw implications for designers, policymakers, and educators.

cs.HC↗