Cartograph: Federated Tool Discovery with Operator-Attested Retrieval for AI Agents

Justice Owusu Agyemang; Michael Agyare; Kwame Opuni-Boachie Obour Agyekum; Kwame Agyeman-Prempeh Agyekum; Francisca Adoma Acheampong; Jerry John Kponyo

arXiv · 2609.30293

Cartograph: Federated Tool Discovery with Operator-Attested Retrieval for AI Agents

Justice Owusu Agyemang·Michael Agyare·Kwame Opuni-Boachie Obour Agyekum·Kwame Agyeman-Prempeh Agyekum·Francisca Adoma Acheampong·Jerry John Kponyo

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) enables AI agents to discover and call tools, but loading every definition becomes expensive as connected catalogs grow. We present Cartograph, a federated MCP proxy that changes agent-visible tool discovery from $O(n)$ catalog traversal to $O(k)$ progressive disclosure. Cartograph combines three mechanisms: (1) operator-attested capability cards, Ed25519-signed descriptions generated under the deploying operator's control rather than ranked publisher copy; (2) Rift, a three-layer confusable-cluster analysis comprising density clustering, query-margin analysis, and token diagnosis; and (3) two-stage retrieval, which ranks servers before tools. On a 22-server, 374-tool deployment, Cartograph exposes three proxy tools instead of 374 definitions. A 49-query author-constructed benchmark yields R@5 of 0.816, compared with 0.592 for a Jaccard keyword baseline, while a measured top-5 discovery exchange uses 475 tokens rather than 42,450 under the stated full-catalog accounting. Rift identifies 49 confusable clusters, including four HIGH-risk clusters in bootstrap-generated cards. An exploratory comparison of 119 LLM-generated descriptions removes the observed zero-distance cluster but shows that mixing card-generation regimes can reduce R@5. Gateway measurements over ten trials add 5ms mean latency (0.8%) relative to direct stdio MCP calls. Cartograph is complementary to code-execution approaches: it controls which tool descriptions are surfaced and records the provenance of the descriptions used for ranking for each query.

Explore related subjects

cs.CL cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Justice Owusu Agyemang, Michael Agyare, Kwame Opuni-Boachie Obour Agyekum, Kwame Agyeman-Prempeh Agyekum, Francisca Adoma Acheampong, Jerry John Kponyo. 2026-09-13. Cartograph: Federated Tool Discovery with Operator-Attested Retrieval for AI Agents. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30293

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Learning From How Humans Correct

In industry NLP application, our manually labeled data has a certain number of noisy data. We present a simple method to find the noisy data and relabel them manually, meanwhile we collect the correction information. Then we present novel method to incorporate the human correction information into deep learning model. Human know how to correct noisy data. So the correction information can be inject into deep learning model. We do the experiment on our own text classification dataset, which is manually labeled, because we need to relabel the noisy data in our dataset for our industry application. The experiment result shows that our learn-on-correction method improve the classification accuracy from 91.7% to 92.5% in test dataset. The 91.7% accuracy is trained on the corrected dataset, which improve the baseline from 83.3% to 91.7% in test dataset. The accuracy under human evaluation achieves more than 97%.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

MBBQ: A Dataset for Cross-Lingual Comparison of Stereotypes in Generative LLMs

Generative large language models (LLMs) have been shown to exhibit harmful biases and stereotypes. While safety fine-tuning typically takes place in English, if at all, these models are being used by speakers of many different languages. There is existing evidence that the performance of these models is inconsistent across languages and that they discriminate based on demographic factors of the user. Motivated by this, we investigate whether the social stereotypes exhibited by LLMs differ as a function of the language used to prompt them, while controlling for cultural differences and task accuracy. To this end, we present MBBQ (Multilingual Bias Benchmark for Question-answering), a carefully curated version of the English BBQ dataset extended to Dutch, Spanish, and Turkish, which measures stereotypes commonly held across these languages. We further complement MBBQ with a parallel control dataset to measure task performance on the question-answering task independently of bias. Our results based on several open-source and proprietary LLMs confirm that some non-English languages suffer from bias more than English, even when controlling for cultural shifts. Moreover, we observe significant cross-lingual differences in bias behaviour for all except the most accurate models. With the release of MBBQ, we hope to encourage further research on bias in multilingual settings. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/Veranep/MBBQ.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

LLMR: Knowledge Distillation with a Large Language Model-Induced Reward

Large language models have become increasingly popular and demonstrated remarkable performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, these models are typically computationally expensive and difficult to be deployed in resource-constrained environments. In this paper, we propose LLMR, a novel knowledge distillation (KD) method based on a reward function induced from large language models. We conducted experiments on multiple datasets in the dialogue generation and summarization tasks. Empirical results demonstrate that our LLMR approach consistently outperforms traditional KD methods in different tasks and datasets.

cs.CL↗