arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.27941

A bandwidth refinement of the Erdős distinct subset sums bound

Abstract

Let $f(n)$ be the least possible largest element of an $n$-element set of positive integers with pairwise distinct subset sums. Dubroff, Fox and Xu proved the finite lower bound \[ f(n)\ge \binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor} \] by applying a vertex-boundary estimate to the $2^{n-1}$ subsets whose sums lie below half of the total sum. We instead order all $2^n$ subsets by increasing subset-sum value. We prove that the bandwidth of this numbering is at most the largest element of the set, so the exact formula for the bandwidth of the hypercube gives the stronger finite bound \[ f(n)\ge H_n:=\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\binom{j}{\lfloor j/2\rfloor}. \] An exact identity for $H_n$ in terms of Catalan numbers yields \[ \frac{H_n}{\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}} =\begin{cases} 1+\dfrac{2}{3n}+O(n^{-2}),& n\text{ even},\\[5pt] 1+\dfrac{4}{3n}+O(n^{-2}),& n\text{ odd}. \end{cases} \] For every $n\ge3$, this bound is strictly larger than the central-binomial bound. As a separate corollary, a first-order asymptotic formula for factorials rewrites this lower bound as a multiple of $\sqrt{2/π}\,2^n/\sqrt n$; the coefficients of $1/n$ are $5/12$ in even dimension and $7/12$ in odd dimension.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Simone Costa, Stefano Della Fiore. 2026-08-22. A bandwidth refinement of the Erdős distinct subset sums bound. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27941

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO↗

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO↗

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO↗