Spread and Scale: What Determines Whether Test-Time Budget Allocation Pays

Jinhyung Bae

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.27917

Spread and Scale: What Determines Whether Test-Time Budget Allocation Pays

Jinhyung Bae

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Neural combinatorial optimization solvers generate many candidate solutions per instance and report the best one found, using the same sample budget for every instance regardless of difficulty. A companion study showed that reallocating a fixed budget toward harder instances can improve solution quality, but that the standard way of measuring this improvement is biased: deciding an allocation and evaluating it on the same data can manufacture an apparent gain even when none exists. This left open what property of a workload determines whether reallocation is worth doing, and whether a policy that spends part of the budget to decide how to allocate the rest still pays once that cost is counted. This paper answers both questions through pre-registered confirmatory experiments -- analysis and verdict criteria fixed before data collection -- across three independently trained solvers and two ways of constructing harder workloads on the traveling salesman problem. Within the workloads we study, the deciding property is how varied the instances within a workload are in difficulty, not how difficult the workload is on average: a uniformly easy or uniformly hard workload offers little room for reallocation, while a mixed workload offers substantial room. A budget-aware policy that pays for its own information about instance difficulty recovers most, though not all, of the improvement available when that information is assumed free. Every experiment was independently recomputed from its written specification, and every correction to an earlier version -- including two that weakened the paper's own claims -- is reported with the direction it moved the conclusion. The paper offers a specific empirical answer and a template for verifying that answer is not an artifact of how it was measured.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG cs.AI math.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Jinhyung Bae. 2026-08-21. Spread and Scale: What Determines Whether Test-Time Budget Allocation Pays. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27917

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Random Polytope Descriptors

We introduce a class of random polytopes which simultaneously generalizes several known constructions. While being fairly general, these polytopes are also computationally exceptionally benign. We indicate how these properties can be exploited for classification and clustering tasks in data analysis. Crucially, our construction lets users smoothly trade off between a tighter description of the data and faster computation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

CurvFed: Curvature-Aligned Federated Learning for Fairness without Demographics

Modern human sensing applications often rely on data distributed across users and devices, where privacy concerns prevent centralized training. Federated Learning (FL) addresses this challenge by enabling collaborative model training without exposing raw data or attributes. However, achieving fairness in such settings remains difficult, as most human sensing datasets lack demographic labels, and FL's privacy guarantees limit the use of sensitive attributes. This paper introduces CurvFed: Curvature Aligned Federated Learning for Fairness without Demographics, a theoretically grounded framework that promotes fairness in FL without requiring any demographic or sensitive attribute information, a concept termed Fairness without Demographics (FWD), by optimizing the underlying loss landscape curvature. Building on the theory that equivalent loss landscape curvature corresponds to consistent model efficacy across sensitive attribute groups, CurvFed regularizes the top eigenvalue of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) as an efficient proxy for loss landscape curvature, both within and across clients. This alignment promotes uniform model behavior across diverse bias inducing factors, offering an attribute agnostic route to algorithmic fairness. CurvFed is especially suitable for real world human sensing FL scenarios involving single or multi user edge devices with unknown or multiple bias factors. We validated CurvFed through theoretical and empirical justifications, as well as comprehensive evaluations using three real world datasets and a deployment on a heterogeneous testbed of resource constrained devices. Additionally, we conduct sensitivity analyses on local training data volume, client sampling, communication overhead, resource costs, and runtime performance to demonstrate its feasibility for practical FL edge device deployment.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Path Regularization: A Near-Complete and Optimal Nonasymptotic Generalization Theory for Multilayer Neural Networks and Double Descent Phenomenon

Path regularization has shown to be a very effective regularization to train neural networks, leading to a better generalization property than common regularizations i.e. weight decay, etc. We propose a first near-complete (as will be made explicit in the main text) nonasymptotic generalization theory for multilayer neural networks with path regularizations for general learning problems. In particular, it does not require the boundedness of the loss function, as is commonly assumed in the literature. Our theory goes beyond the bias-variance tradeoff and aligns with phenomena typically encountered in deep learning. It is therefore sharply different from other existing nonasymptotic generalization error bounds. More explicitly, we propose an explicit generalization error upper bound for multilayer neural networks with $σ(0)=0$ and sufficiently broad Lipschitz loss functions, without requiring the width, depth, or other hyperparameters of the neural network to approach infinity, a specific neural network architecture (e.g., sparsity), or boundedness of the loss function, while also taking approximation error into consideration. In particular, we solve an open problem proposed by Weinan E et. al. in 2020 regarding the approximation rates in generalized Barron spaces. Furthermore, we show the near-minimax optimality of our theory for regression problems with ReLU activations. Notably, our upper bound exhibits the famous double descent phenomenon for such networks, which is the most distinguished characteristic compared with other existing results. Our subsequent work will prove the matching lower bounds in the minimax sense, meaning that it is highly possible that our theory reveals the true underlying mechanism of the double descent phenomenon. We can also explain scaling law from this theory.

cs.LG↗