arXiv · 2609.27764
Learning to Detect Symbolic Failure: Machine Learning and the Limits of Black-Scholes
Abstract
We treat options pricing as a representation problem: can machine learning detect systematic deviations from Black-Scholes using 2.6M real option contracts? We compare three regimes: learned abstract embeddings (Kernel PCA), preserved domain structure (tree-based ensembles), and neural network validation. Tree-based methods outperform kernel dimensionality reduction by 21.5 percentage points (93.8% vs 72.3%), and domain-expert features (Greeks, moneyness) outperform engineered features. NN-based and BS-based deviation labels agree 99.9974% of the time, suggesting deviations reflect market structure rather than model artifact. We conclude that in domains with expert-designed symbolic features, preserving structure beats learning abstractions. We make no claim of exploitable mispricings.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Juli Huang, Jake Cheng, Rupert Lu. 2026-08-24. Learning to Detect Symbolic Failure: Machine Learning and the Limits of Black-Scholes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27764
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.