arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.27605

Symmetric polyhedral scenes and parallel redrawings

Signe Lundqvist·Bernd Schulze·Klara Stokes
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Liftings and parallel redrawings are classical topics in applied discrete geometry, concerned respectively with vertically lifting a $(d-1)$-picture -- a realisation of a vertex-hyperplane incidence geometry in $\mathbb{R}^{d-1}$ -- to a $d$-dimensional polyhedral scene, and with redrawing a $d$-picture (or hyperplane arrangement) within $\mathbb{R}^d$ while preserving prescribed hyperplane normals. In this paper, we develop a unified framework for the analysis of forced-symmetric liftings and forced-symmetric parallel redrawings. In particular, we show that the classical duality for these theories also appears in the forced-symmetric setting. We establish the orbit lifting matrix and the orbit concurrence geometry matrix, and show that they are the appropriate symmetry-adapted analogues of the standard lifting matrix and concurrence geometry (or parallel redrawing) matrix. We also make explicit the relationship with the orbit version of Whiteley's parallel design matrix for graphs. Using these tools, we derive necessary conditions for symmetric pictures to be forced-symmetric flat, and for symmetric hyperplane arrangements to be forced-symmetric robust, expressed as sparsity counts on the group-labelled quotient graphs associated with the symmetric incidence geometries. Finally, we discuss conjectures regarding the sufficiency of these conditions for generic configurations.

Explore related subjects

math.COmath.MG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Signe Lundqvist, Bernd Schulze, Klara Stokes. 2026-09-23. Symmetric polyhedral scenes and parallel redrawings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27605

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO↗