arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.27384

Shape without scale: an identifiability dichotomy for a bounded tail observed through a non-additive measurement kernel

Abstract

A latent severity has a bounded lower tail with density of shape alpha and scale L. It is observed only through a fixed Markov kernel K that is biased and non-additive. The relative conditional spread of K diverges at the endpoint. Our sample is i.i.d. from the marginal Q alone, with no anchoring covariate or instrument. We prove a dichotomy. The shape index alpha is identifiable: for every admissible choice of the class constants, any two observationally equivalent members of a lean class share alpha, determined by a near-endpoint expansion of Q. The rate, namely L and the fixed-scale exceedance p_tau, does not survive. There exist admissible shared class constants and two members of a smaller regularity class whose observed laws coincide exactly. Across the pair alpha agrees, whereas L and p_tau move. A degenerate Le Cam two-point bound excludes any uniformly consistent estimator of either, and pointwise consistency fails at one member. Only the rate needs an anchor. We conjecture that a known kernel family with known edge map identifies the rate fiber by fiber if and only if the family satisfies a fixed-scale injectivity clause, and we prove the sufficiency direction. In surrogate safety, uncalibrated conflict data give the shape of near-crash risk, not its absolute rate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiarui Qi. 2026-09-23. Shape without scale: an identifiability dichotomy for a bounded tail observed through a non-additive measurement kernel. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27384

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Variance Reduction for Independent Metropolis

Assume that we would like to estimate the expected value of a function $F$ with respect to an intractable density $π$, which is specified up to some unknown normalising constant. We prove that if $π$ is close enough under KL divergence to another density $q$, an independent Metropolis sampler estimator that obtains samples from $π$ with proposal density $q$, enriched with a variance reduction computational strategy based on control variates, achieves smaller asymptotic variance than i.i.d. sampling from $π$. The control variates construction requires no extra computational effort but assumes that the expected value of $F$ under $q$ is analytically available. We illustrate this result by calculating the marginal likelihood in a linear regression model with prior-likelihood conflict and a non-conjugate prior. Furthermore, we propose an adaptive independent Metropolis algorithm that adapts the proposal density such that its KL divergence with the target is being reduced. We demonstrate its applicability in a Bayesian logistic and Gaussian process regression problems and we rigorously justify our asymptotic arguments under easily verifiable and essentially minimal conditions.

math.ST↗

Edgeworth corrections for the spiked eigenvalues of non-Gaussian sample covariance matrices with applications

Yang and Johnstone (2018) established an Edgeworth correction for the largest sample eigenvalue in a spiked covariance model under the assumption of Gaussian observations, leaving the extension to non-Gaussian settings as an open problem. In this paper, we address this issue by establishing first-order Edgeworth expansions for spiked eigenvalues in both single-spike and multi-spike scenarios with non-Gaussian data. Leveraging these expansions, we construct more accurate confidence intervals for the population spiked eigenvalues and propose a novel estimator for the number of spikes. Simulation studies demonstrate that our proposed methodology outperforms existing approaches in both robustness and accuracy across a wide range of settings, particularly in low-dimensional cases.

math.ST↗

Measures of Dependence based on Wasserstein distances

Measuring dependence between random variables is a fundamental problem in Statistics, with applications across diverse fields. While classical measures such as Pearson's correlation have been widely used for over a century, they have notable limitations, particularly in capturing nonlinear relationships and extending to general metric spaces. In recent years, the theory of Optimal Transport and Wasserstein distances has provided new tools to define measures of dependence that generalize beyond Euclidean settings. This survey explores recent proposals, outlining two main approaches: one based on the distance between the joint distribution and the product of marginals, and another leveraging conditional distributions. We discuss key properties, including characterization of independence, normalization, invariances, robustness, sample, and computational complexity. Additionally, we propose an alternative perspective that measures deviation from maximal dependence rather than independence, leading to new insights and potential extensions. Our work highlights recent advances in the field and suggests directions for further research in the measurement of dependence using Optimal Transport.

math.ST↗